Tariff Concession Order 0714136

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2007L04409 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0714136

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

Secura Holdings Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain scaffolding components on 30 August 2007.

Instrument

TCO No 0714136 was made on 09 November 2007.  It declares that those certain scaffolding components are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

 

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 0714136 is taken to have come into force on 30 August 2007.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, provides a framework for the administration of customs and excise duties in Australia. The Act establishes mechanisms for the assessment and collection of these duties, with particular focus on facilitating trade and ensuring compliance. One notable aspect of the Act is the establishment of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) under Part XVA, which allow for reduced customs duty rates on certain imported goods, provided specific criteria are met. This initiative was introduced to address the gap in the duty structure by providing concessions where no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. The aim of this legislative provision is to support industries by making imported goods more competitive, thereby fostering economic growth and enhancing trade competitiveness. The explanatory statement for Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0714136, made under the Customs Act 1901, details a specific instance where Secura Holdings Pty Ltd successfully applied for a TCO concerning certain scaffolding components. The Chief Executive Officer of Customs, after reviewing the application and finding that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia, issued the TCO No. 0714136, effective from 30 August 2007. This order resulted in the scaffolding components being subject to a free duty rate, down from the general rate of 5%. The implementation of this TCO exemplifies the Act's objective of providing targeted relief to industries reliant on imported goods, thus supporting the broader economic policy of promoting fair trade practices and industry development.

Scope and Application

The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVA, facilitates the application of tariff concession orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. These orders apply to specific goods, granting them a lower rate of customs duty, and are applicable to any person who submits an application under section 269F, provided the goods in question are not specified in section 269SJ which lists goods that cannot be subject to a TCO. The Act mandates that a TCO can only be issued if no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business, as defined by sections 269C, 269D, and 269E. Upon meeting the core criteria, the CEO is required to make a written order specifying the applicable tariff concession, as outlined in Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995. The scope of this legislation is national, operating within the Commonwealth of Australia, and the Act does not specify any exclusions or exemptions beyond those goods listed in section 269SJ. Any rights and liabilities under this Act are governed by the commencement date of the TCO, which aligns with the date the application was lodged, as per subsection 269S(1). The CEO is also required to publish notices in the Gazette inviting submissions from interested parties, although in the case of TCO No. 0714136, no submissions were received.

Key Provisions

The Tariff Concession Order (TCO) No. 0714136 under the Customs Act 1901 (section 269P(3)) applies to certain scaffolding components. It was made on 9 November 2007, following an application by Secura Holdings Pty Ltd on 30 August 2007. This order declares that the specified scaffolding components are subject to a lower rate of customs duty, specifically free of charge, as opposed to the general rate of 5% as stipulated in item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995. The order becomes effective from the date the application was lodged, 30 August 2007 (subsection 269S(1)). The obligations imposed by the TCO on entities and individuals involve ensuring compliance with the terms of the order, particularly concerning the importation of scaffolding components. Importers, for example, must adhere to the duty-free status of the specified goods and may apply for refunds of any duties paid before the TCO came into effect (paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations). The Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) must also follow the procedural requirements, such as publishing a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions on the TCO application (subsection 269K(1)). The CEO's satisfaction with the core criteria, which include the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia on the application date, is also critical (sections 269C and 269D). Breaching the terms of the TCO could lead to civil or criminal consequences. While the explanatory statement does not explicitly detail specific offences or penalties, violations of customs regulations generally can attract penalties under the Customs Act 1901. These can include fines, imprisonment, or both. The maximum penalties can vary based on the severity and intent behind the breach, but they are typically severe enough to deter non-compliance. Importers failing to apply for duty refunds within the stipulated timeframe might also face financial losses or legal actions. Therefore, adherence to the TCO's stipulations is crucial to avoid any adverse legal or financial repercussions.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.