Tariff Concession Order 0710122

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2007L03706 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0710122

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

BCS Conveyor Solutions Pty Limited applied for a TCO in respect of certain telescopic conveyors on 28 June 2007.

Instrument

TCO No 0710122 was made on 07 September 2007.  It declares that those certain telescopic conveyors are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

 

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 0710122 is taken to have come into force on 28 June 2007.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0710122 was enacted in 2007 under the Customs Act 1901 to address the need for tariff concessions on specific goods that are not produced in Australia and do not have substitutable alternatives. The instrument was introduced to facilitate the reduction of customs duty for certain imported goods, which in this case were certain telescopic conveyors applied for by BCS Conveyor Solutions Pty Limited. The Customs Act 1901 provides a framework for the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to make Tariff Concession Orders that lower the customs duty on goods, provided certain criteria are met. This particular instrument was made to benefit importers by eliminating duty on specified goods, thereby improving their competitive position in the market. The instrument was enacted by the Parliament of Australia with the aim of promoting fair trade practices and supporting the economic interests of businesses that rely on importing specific goods not produced domestically.

Scope and Application

The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0710122 under the Customs Act 1901 applies to the specific goods, namely certain telescopic conveyors, as identified by BCS Conveyor Solutions Pty Limited in their application. This instrument is applicable to the person or entity that makes the application and to the goods specified in the order, ensuring they benefit from a reduced rate of customs duty. The Act’s scope extends to goods that are not being produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business and do not have substitutable alternatives. Geographically, the application and effect of the TCO are nationwide, subject to the Commonwealth's jurisdiction as outlined in the Customs Act. Notably, the TCO excludes any goods that cannot be subject to tariff concessions as specified in section 269SJ of the Act. The Instrument may also be extended or modified through subordinate instruments, ensuring flexibility and responsiveness to changing circumstances or requirements. The TCO’s commencement date is aligned with the date the application was lodged, ensuring that rights and benefits accrue from that date forward without disadvantaging any existing rights or imposing new liabilities.

Key Provisions

The main sections of the Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0710122 are sections 269C, 269B, 269D, 269E, 269P, and 269S. These sections establish the criteria for the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs to consider when deciding whether to grant a Tariff Concession Order (TCO). Specifically, section 269C requires that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged. Section 269B defines terms such as "goods produced in Australia" and "ordinary course of business," while section 269P(3) mandates that if the application meets the criteria, the CEO must make a written TCO order. Section 269S(1) provides that a TCO comes into force on the day the application is lodged. The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties involved are primarily on the CEO of Customs. The CEO must ensure that any TCO application is considered against the core criteria outlined in section 269C. If the application is valid and meets these criteria, the CEO is required to publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from the public. After considering any submissions received, the CEO must make a TCO if appropriate. On the other hand, the applicant, such as BCS Conveyor Solutions Pty Limited in this case, must submit a valid application and ensure that it meets the specified criteria. Once a TCO is granted, the applicant must comply with any conditions or requirements stipulated in the order. In terms of potential offences, penalties, or consequences for breach, the Act does not explicitly outline specific offences related to the TCO process itself. However, any failure to comply with the conditions set out in a TCO could potentially result in penalties under other relevant legislation, such as the Customs Act 1901 or the Crimes Act 1914. For instance, knowingly making a false statement in an application could be considered a form of fraud, which carries potential criminal penalties. Additionally, the Tariff Concession Instrument does not impose any new liabilities on individuals or entities, but it does provide benefits such as duty-free importation for the specified goods. It is also important to note that the TCO does not affect the rights of any person as at the date of registration in a way that would disadvantage them or impose liabilities for actions taken prior to the registration date. This ensures that the TCO's implementation is fair and does not retroactively impose new obligations or liabilities on individuals or entities. The rights of importers, however, are beneficially affected as they can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO's effective date, as stipulated in the Customs (Conveyances) Regulations 1995.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Commencement Provisions
Licensing & Registration
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.