EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0710032
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Carbridge Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain aerodrome apron buses on 27 June 2007.
Instrument
TCO No 0710032 was made on 07 September 2007. It declares that those certain aerodrome apron buses are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0710032 is taken to have come into force on 27 June 2007.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, provides a framework for the imposition of customs duties on goods entering the country. It allows the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to grant tariff concession orders (TCOs) under Part XVA, which apply a lower rate of customs duty to specific goods. The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0710032 was introduced to address the need for tariff concessions on certain aerodrome apron buses, facilitating their importation without incurring the standard customs duty rate. The explanatory statement details that Carbridge Pty Ltd applied for this concession, and following the satisfaction of the core criteria, the CEO issued the TCO on 7 September 2007, which came into force on 27 June 2007. This instrument ensures that importers of these buses can apply for duty refunds on imports made since the effective date of the TCO, thereby promoting trade and economic efficiency.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVA, governs the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) which apply reduced rates of customs duty to certain goods. The Act allows for individuals or entities to apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO if the goods in question are not specified in section 269SJ, which lists goods ineligible for tariff concessions. For a TCO to be granted, the CEO must be satisfied that the application meets the core criteria, primarily that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia at the time of application. Once the CEO makes a TCO, it comes into effect from the date the application was lodged. This process aims to benefit importers by reducing duty rates on eligible goods, provided they apply for a refund of duties paid before the TCO's effective date. The Act ensures that no existing rights or liabilities of any person, other than the Commonwealth, are adversely affected by the concession. The scope of the Act is national, applying across Australia, and it does not specify any exclusions beyond those in section 269SJ of the Act itself. The Act may be further detailed through subordinate instruments, although none are specified in this particular explanatory statement.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901 provides a mechanism, under Part XVA, for the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to make Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) which lower the rate of customs duty on certain goods. An application for a TCO can be made under section 269F of the Act by any person. To be considered, the application must not be for goods listed in section 269SJ, which are ineligible for tariff concessions. The CEO must assess whether the application meets the core criteria specified in section 269C, which require that, on the date the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
The Act defines "substitutable goods" in section 269B as goods produced in Australia that could serve a similar purpose to the goods in question. If the CEO determines that the application satisfies these criteria, they are required, under subsection 269P(3), to issue a written TCO that specifies the applicable tariff item from Schedule 4 of the Customs Tariff Act 1995. For example, Instrument TCO No. 0710032, made on 7 September 2007, applied to certain aerodrome apron buses, specifying that they were subject to item 50 of Schedule 4, with a duty rate of free, down from the general rate of 5%.
The CEO has an obligation to publish a notice in the Gazette, as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application, inviting any person who believes the TCO should not be granted to submit their reasons to the CEO. In the case of TCO No. 0710032, no submissions were received in response to this invitation. The TCO comes into force on the date the application was lodged, according to subsection 269S(1) of the Act. This means that TCO No. 0710032 is considered to have come into effect on 27 June 2007, the date the application was submitted. Importantly, the TCO does not retroactively affect the rights of any person other than the Commonwealth and does not impose any new liabilities on individuals or entities. Importers of the affected goods can apply for a refund of duty paid on goods imported since the effective date of the TCO, as permitted under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations.
Failure to comply with the requirements of the Customs Act 1901 or the associated regulations can result in civil or criminal penalties. For instance, knowingly making a false or misleading statement in an application for a TCO can lead to criminal charges, with penalties including fines of up to $22,200 for individuals and $111,000 for corporations, as stipulated under section 269T of the Act. Additionally, any person who knowingly contravenes the Act or regulations can be subject to civil penalties, including fines, as outlined in the relevant sections of the legislation. These provisions ensure that the tariff concession scheme operates within the legal framework designed to protect the interests of all parties involved.