EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0707017
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Target Australia Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain kitchenware on 10 May 2007.
Instrument
TCO No 0707017 was made on 20 July 2007. It declares that those certain kitchenware are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is 0%.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0707017 is taken to have come into force on 10 May 2007.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0707017 was enacted in 2007 under the Customs Act 1901 to address the need for tariff concessions on specific imported goods, in this case, certain kitchenware. The Customs Act 1901, administered by the Parliament of Australia, provides a framework through which the Chief Executive Officer of Customs can grant tariff concessions to applicants, subject to certain criteria being met. The policy objective of this legislative instrument was to facilitate smoother trade by reducing the customs duty burden on the import of particular goods, thereby potentially lowering costs for businesses and consumers. This particular instrument was developed in response to an application by Target Australia Pty Ltd, seeking a tariff concession on certain kitchenware items, and it was enacted after the CEO was satisfied that the application met the necessary criteria, specifically that no substitutable goods were being produced in Australia at the time of the application.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, as amended, facilitates the granting of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) through which the Chief Executive Officer of Customs may reduce the rate of customs duty on specific goods. The Act applies to any person or entity that wishes to apply for a reduction in customs duty on particular goods by submitting a TCO application to the CEO. This process is particularly relevant to industries and businesses involved in the importation of goods that could benefit from lower duty rates. The scope of the Act encompasses the entire Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring that the legislative provisions and TCOs apply nationally. Notably, certain goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act are ineligible for TCOs. Additionally, the Act allows for the extension or restriction of its application through subordinate instruments, although the specifics of such extensions or restrictions are not detailed in the provided text. The TCOs themselves have a retroactive effect, taken to have come into force on the date the application was lodged, and they do not adversely affect the rights of any person or impose liabilities for actions taken prior to the registration of the TCO.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0707017, made under the Customs Act 1901 (the Act), pertains to the application and implementation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) for certain goods. Section 269F of the Act allows an individual to apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO in relation to specific goods. If the CEO is convinced that the application pertains to goods that are not excluded under section 269SJ, they must determine whether the application meets the core criteria. The core criteria are detailed in sections 269B and 269C of the Act. Section 269C specifies that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the date the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. In this context, 'substitutable goods' are defined in section 269D of the Act, referring to goods produced in Australia that are used, or capable of being used, for the same purpose as the goods in question.
Section 269P(3) stipulates that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, they must issue a written order, known as a TCO. This order declares that the goods in question are subject to a specified item of Schedule 4 of the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff). The instrument in question, TCO No. 0707017, was made on 20 July 2007, and it declares that certain kitchenware are subject to item 50 of Schedule 4 of the Tariff, with a reduced rate of duty from 5% to 0%. This was based on the CEO’s satisfaction that no substitutable goods were being produced in Australia.
The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties involved include the requirement for the CEO to publish a notice in the Gazette, as per subsection 269K(1), inviting any interested party to submit reasons why a TCO should not be made. This was done following the acceptance of the TCO application as valid. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation. Additionally, under subsection 269S(1), a TCO is considered to come into force on the day the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0707017 is deemed to have come into force on 10 May 2007. The rights of importers will be positively affected, as they can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO came into force, in accordance with paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations. However, the TCO does not disadvantage any person or impose liabilities on any person other than the Commonwealth in respect of actions taken before the date of registration.
In terms of potential offences, penalties, or consequences, the Act does not explicitly state any criminal or civil penalties for breaches related to TCOs. However, any failure to comply with the requirements or obligations set forth in the Act, such as providing false information in a TCO application, could potentially lead to legal action or penalties as prescribed by other relevant laws. The maximum penalties would depend on the specific nature of the breach and the applicable provisions of other legislation.