EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0706216
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Bluescope Steel Limited applied for a TCO in respect of certain roll grinder gear lubrication pumps on 30 April 2007.
Instrument
TCO No 0706216 was made on 23 July 2007. It declares that those certain roll grinder gear lubrication pumps are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0706216 is taken to have come into force on 30 April 2007.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0706216, enacted in 2007 under the Customs Act 1901, was introduced to provide relief to importers by allowing tariff concessions for certain goods, specifically roll grinder gear lubrication pumps. This instrument was made in response to an application by Bluescope Steel Limited and follows the procedures outlined in Part XVA of the Customs Act. The primary objective of this legislation is to ensure that a lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that meet specific criteria, thereby benefiting importers by reducing their duty obligations. The instrument was issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, who determined that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia, thus satisfying the core criteria for tariff concessions. This initiative ensures that the rights of importers are preserved and potentially enhanced by allowing them to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the Tariff Concession Order came into force.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901 applies to entities and individuals involved in the importation of goods into Australia, specifically in relation to the application and administration of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). These TCOs are instruments issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to reduce or eliminate customs duty on specified goods when certain criteria are met, such as the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. The Act outlines the process for applying for a TCO, the criteria that must be satisfied for the CEO to grant such an order, and the conditions under which the concessional duty rate applies. The geographic scope of the Act is national, affecting all importers and entities involved in the importation of goods into Australia. While the Act itself does not explicitly state exclusions or exemptions, section 269SJ specifies goods that cannot be the subject of a TCO. The application and enforcement of the Act can be further detailed through subordinate instruments, which may provide additional regulations or clarifications to the provisions set out in the primary legislation.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0706216, made under the Customs Act 1901, primarily focuses on the application and granting of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) for specific goods, in this case, roll grinder gear lubrication pumps (section 269C). For an applicant to successfully obtain a TCO, they must demonstrate that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia on the day the application is lodged (section 269D). If the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs is satisfied that the application meets the criteria, they must issue a written order (section 269P(3)). In this instance, the CEO granted the order for Bluescope Steel Limited's application for certain roll grinder gear lubrication pumps, specifying that these goods are subject to item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995, with a duty rate of free instead of the general 5% rate.
The obligations imposed by the Customs Act 1901 on the parties involved primarily pertain to the process of applying for and granting TCOs. The applicant must ensure their application is valid and meets the core criteria, particularly proving that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. The CEO, on the other hand, is obligated to review applications, consider any submissions, and publish notices in the Gazette inviting objections or submissions before making a decision (subsection 269K(1)). If the CEO determines that the application meets the criteria, they must promptly issue a TCO (section 269P(3)).
Section 269S(1) of the Customs Act 1901 stipulates that a TCO takes effect from the date the application was lodged, which, in this case, was 30 April 2007. The rights of persons other than the Commonwealth are not adversely affected by the TCO, and no new liabilities are imposed on them. However, importers of the specified goods can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the effective date of the TCO (paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations). The CEO must also ensure that no submissions are received that would prevent the granting of the TCO.
The Customs Act 1901 does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or consequences for breaches related to the issuance or misuse of TCOs. However, any failure to comply with the conditions or misuse of the TCO could potentially lead to legal consequences under broader provisions of the Customs Act or related legislation. For example, any misrepresentation or fraudulent activity in the application process could result in penalties under sections pertaining to false statements or fraudulent behaviour. Nonetheless, the primary focus of the legislation is on ensuring a transparent and fair process for granting tariff concessions, rather than detailing specific sanctions for non-compliance.