EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0705337
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
NDC Technology Australia Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain automated guided vehicle motor-in-wheel drives on 11 April 2007.
Instrument
TCO No 0705337 was made on 29 June 2007. It declares that those certain automated guided vehicle motor-in-wheel drives are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0705337 is taken to have come into force on 11 April 2007.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0705337 was enacted in 2007 under the Customs Act 1901 to provide tariff concessions for specific goods, namely certain automated guided vehicle motor-in-wheel drives. The primary objective of this instrument is to reduce the customs duty on these particular goods, thereby encouraging their importation and use within Australia. This legislation was introduced to address a gap in the availability of competitively priced, locally-produced alternatives for these specialised goods, thereby ensuring that Australian industries have access to necessary technology without the burden of high import tariffs. The instrument was made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, following the application by NDC Technology Australia Pty Ltd and after satisfying the core criteria stipulated in the Customs Act. No submissions opposing the tariff concession were received, indicating a general acceptance of the instrument's objectives and implications.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901 applies to individuals and entities involved in the importation of goods into Australia, with a specific focus on the application of customs duties and the potential for tariff concessions. The Act allows the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to make Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) that can reduce the rate of customs duty on certain goods, provided the application meets specific criteria such as the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. The geographic and jurisdictional reach of this legislation is national, as it operates under the authority of the Commonwealth of Australia. The scope of the Act is limited by exclusions, notably in section 269SJ which specifies goods that cannot be subject to a TCO. The Act extends its application through subordinate instruments, such as the Customs Tariff Act 1995, which specifies the rates of duty applicable to various goods. The application process includes a requirement for public consultation, ensuring transparency and allowing interested parties to voice any objections to the concession before it is granted. This particular TCO, effective from the date of the application, provides a zero-duty rate for certain automated guided vehicle motor-in-wheel drives, benefiting importers who can apply for duty refunds on qualifying imports.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concession Order (TCO) No. 0705337, made under the Customs Act 1901, pertains to specific automated guided vehicle motor-in-wheel drives, as outlined in section 269P(3). This instrument was enacted to provide tariff concessions for these goods, effectively reducing the customs duty from 5% to free (section 269P(3)). The Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) issued this order on 29 June 2007, confirming that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia at the time of application, which met the core criteria specified in section 269C. This order is retroactive to the date of the application, 11 April 2007, as per subsection 269S(1).
Under the Customs Act, the CEO has the authority to issue TCOs if certain conditions are met. For instance, an applicant can request a TCO under section 269F if the goods in question are not listed in section 269SJ, which specifies goods ineligible for tariff concessions. The CEO must then assess whether the application meets the core criteria, particularly ensuring that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia at the time of the application, as per section 269C. The CEO is required to publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any interested parties, although no submissions were received in response to this particular TCO, as stated in subsection 269K(1).
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. The CEO must diligently review TCO applications and determine if they meet the core criteria, particularly focusing on whether substitutable goods were produced in Australia. If the application satisfies these conditions, the CEO must issue a written TCO, as mandated by section 269P(3). Additionally, the CEO must ensure that the rights of existing parties are not adversely affected by the new concessions, a requirement that is met by the stipulation that the TCO does not affect any rights or impose liabilities for actions taken before the registration date. Importers of the specified goods can also benefit from this order by applying for a refund of any duty paid since the effective date of the TCO, as per paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations.
For breaches of the provisions under the Customs Act, the Act stipulates various offences and penalties. Although specific penalties are not detailed in the Explanatory Statement, violations of customs laws generally can result in substantial fines and, in severe cases, criminal charges. The Act encompasses both civil and criminal penalties, with the severity of the penalties depending on the nature and extent of the breach. The maximum penalties can include fines up to the statutory maximum or imprisonment, depending on whether the offence is categorised as a civil or criminal matter. These provisions underscore the importance of compliance with the Act’s requirements and the potential consequences for non-compliance.