EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0704147
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Julia & Hulda G Cooke applied for a TCO in respect of certain stainless steel wire on 20 March 2007.
Instrument
TCO No 0704147 was made on 08 June 2007. It declares that those certain stainless steel wires are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0704147 is taken to have come into force on 20 March 2007.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was amended by the introduction of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) to provide a mechanism for the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to grant tariff concessions on certain imported goods. Enacted by the Australian Parliament, the objective of this legislative instrument is to facilitate tariff relief on goods for which there are no substitutable Australian-produced alternatives, thereby encouraging trade and reducing costs for importers. Instrument TCO No. 0704147, made on 8 June 2007, addresses the application by Julia & Hulda G Cooke for a tariff concession on certain stainless steel wires. The concession reduces the general duty rate from 5% to free, effective from the date the application was lodged on 20 March 2007. This instrument does not affect existing rights or impose liabilities on persons other than the Commonwealth, and importers may apply for duty refunds on imports made since the effective date.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901 applies to persons and entities involved in the importation of goods into Australia, particularly those seeking tariff concessions. Specifically, it applies to those who may apply for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) from the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. This legislation provides a mechanism through which the CEO can grant lower customs duty rates on certain goods, provided that the application meets the core criteria set out in the Act, such as the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. The application process involves an invitation for public submissions, which can be made within a specified period after the CEO accepts the TCO application as valid. Geographically, the Act operates within the Commonwealth jurisdiction, and its provisions are enforced nationally. However, certain goods, as specified in section 269SJ of the Act, are excluded from the application of a TCO. The Act also allows for the extension or restriction of its application through subordinate instruments, such as regulations. The commencement of the TCO, as per the Act, is effective from the day on which the application is lodged, with no retroactive effect on pre-existing rights or liabilities.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVA, introduces a framework for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), as referenced in sections 269C, 269D, 269E, 269F, and 269P. A Tariff Concession Order can reduce the customs duty on particular goods, and these orders can be applied for by any individual or entity. The Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) is the authority responsible for deciding whether an application for a TCO meets the core criteria, as outlined in section 269C of the Act. According to this section, for an application to be valid, it must be lodged for goods that are not specified in section 269SJ of the Act and no substitutable goods must be produced in Australia at the time the application is made. The definitions of key terms such as "goods produced in Australia," "ordinary course of business," and "substitutable goods" are further elaborated in sections 269D, 269E, and 269F of the Act, respectively.
Once the CEO determines that an application meets the core criteria, section 269P(3) mandates that a TCO be issued. This order will specify that the goods in question are subject to a lower rate of customs duty as detailed in a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995. For instance, TCO No. 0704147 pertains to certain stainless steel wires and specifies that these goods are subject to a duty rate of free, as opposed to the general rate of 5%. This legislative process ensures that the import duties are adjusted in a manner that considers the domestic production capacity and economic impact.
The obligations imposed by the Customs Act 1901 on the parties involved, particularly the CEO, include the necessity to publish a notice in the Gazette as soon as practicable after accepting a valid TCO application, inviting submissions from any person who might have reasons why the TCO should not be made. This transparency measure is stipulated in subsection 269K(1) of the Act. The CEO is also required to consider any submissions received and make a decision on the TCO application in accordance with the Act's provisions. In the case of TCO No. 0704147, no submissions were received, leading to the issuance of the order.
In terms of penalties and consequences for non-compliance, the Customs Act 1901 does not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties related to the TCO process itself. However, general contraventions of the Customs Act could result in civil or criminal penalties as outlined elsewhere in the Act. The TCO itself does not impose any liabilities on any person other than the Commonwealth and does not affect the rights of any person as at the date of registration in a manner that disadvantages them or imposes liabilities in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.