EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0703951
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
BASF Australia Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain maleic acid/olefin copolymer sodium salt solutions on 14 March 2007.
Instrument
TCO No 0703951 was made on 01 June 2007. It declares that those certain maleic acid/olefin copolymer sodium salt solutions are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0703951 is taken to have come into force on 14 March 2007.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, establishes a framework for the regulation of customs duties and other matters related to the importation and exportation of goods. Part XVA of the Act introduces a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. The objective of this scheme is to provide relief from customs duties for certain goods, thereby facilitating trade and supporting economic activities. Specifically, the Act allows for the application of lower rates of customs duty to goods that are the subject of a TCO, provided that the application meets the core criteria set out in the legislation. This initiative aims to ensure that Australian industries remain competitive by reducing the cost burden of customs duties on specific imported goods.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, through its Part XVA, provides a framework for the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to issue Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) that reduce the rate of customs duty on specific goods, provided certain criteria are met. This mechanism is designed to support importers by potentially lowering their costs on goods not produced in Australia and for which no suitable substitute is available locally. The application process requires the applicant to demonstrate that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. If the CEO determines that the application meets these criteria, a TCO is issued, which specifies a lower rate of duty applicable to the goods. The TCO’s application is retroactive to the date the application was lodged, ensuring that any duties paid prior to the issuance of the TCO can be refunded to the importer. Notably, the TCO does not disadvantage any person by imposing liabilities for actions taken before its registration, nor does it affect existing rights of individuals other than the Commonwealth. This legislative instrument aims to provide economic benefits to importers by reducing the duty on specific imported goods, thus promoting trade efficiency and potentially lowering costs for businesses reliant on these imports.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Customs Act 1901, as applied in Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0703951, pertain to the process of applying for and obtaining Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) (s 269F). When BASF Australia Ltd applied for a TCO concerning certain maleic acid/olefin copolymer sodium salt solutions, the CEO of Customs reviewed the application to determine if it met the core criteria (s 269C). The CEO was required to assess whether substitutable goods were being produced in Australia on the day the application was lodged (s 269P(3)). If satisfied, the CEO must then issue a written TCO, specifying that the goods in question are subject to a particular item in Schedule 4 of the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (s 269P(3)).
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. The CEO of Customs must publish a notice in the Gazette, inviting submissions from any interested parties if they believe the TCO should not be made (s 269K(1)). In this case, no submissions were received. Additionally, the CEO must decide whether the TCO application meets the core criteria, which involves determining if substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business (s 269C). The Act also mandates that TCOs do not affect the rights of any person, except the Commonwealth, as at the date of registration, nor do they impose liabilities for actions taken before the TCO was registered (s 269S(1)).
In terms of potential consequences, the Act does not explicitly detail offences or penalties for breach of the TCO provisions. However, it does state that the TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person (s 269S(1)). Importers of the affected goods may benefit from being able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO was taken to have come into force (Reg 126(1)(r)). While specific penalties are not outlined in the explanatory statement, non-compliance with the conditions of the TCO could potentially lead to legal consequences under the broader Customs Act or other relevant legislation.
In summary, Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0703951, under the Customs Act 1901, facilitates tariff concessions for specific goods by the CEO of Customs, provided certain criteria are met. The Act details the process for applying for and issuing a TCO, as well as the obligations on the CEO and other parties involved. While specific penalties for non-compliance are not detailed, the Act ensures that TCOs do not disadvantage or impose liabilities on anyone except the Commonwealth.