EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0700808
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Man Automotive Imports Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain compression ignition engine truck chassis on 15 January 2007.
Instrument
TCO No 0700808 was made on 10 April 2007. It declares that those certain compression ignition engine truck chassis are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0700808 is taken to have come into force on 15 January 2007.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0700808, enacted under the Customs Act 1901, addresses the need for tariff concessions on specific goods to facilitate trade and economic efficiency. This instrument, introduced by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, aims to provide relief by reducing or eliminating customs duty on certain goods, provided they meet specific criteria such as not having substitutable goods produced in Australia. This approach ensures that Australian industries are not unduly disadvantaged while allowing for the importation of necessary goods that enhance competitiveness and consumer choice. The policy objective is to foster a balanced trade environment that supports economic growth by enabling the import of goods that are crucial for various sectors.
The instrument was developed following an application by Man Automotive Imports Pty Ltd for tariff concessions on certain compression ignition engine truck chassis, leading to the issuance of TCO No. 0700808 on 10 April 2007. This specific TCO, which became effective from 15 January 2007, applies to the listed goods and sets their customs duty rate at zero, down from the general rate of 5%. The instrument’s implementation does not retroactively affect any existing rights or impose new liabilities, ensuring legal certainty and fairness for all parties involved.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0700808, under the Customs Act 1901, applies to certain compression ignition engine truck chassis that are the subject of an application for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO). This instrument is relevant to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs who is responsible for deciding whether an application meets the core criteria for a TCO. The legislation targets specific goods that may be eligible for a lower rate of customs duty if no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. The geographic scope of this Act is national, as it pertains to the Commonwealth of Australia. The TCO itself does not impose any liabilities or disadvantage any person other than the Commonwealth and does not affect any rights as at the date of registration for actions done prior to the registration. The commencement date of this TCO is aligned with the date the application was lodged, in this case, 15 January 2007. The application of the Act may be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, although this particular TCO does not impose any liabilities or disadvantage any person, and it operates to benefit the rights of importers by allowing them to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the effective date of the TCO.
Key Provisions
The primary sections of Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0700808, which is made under the Customs Act 1901, involve the making of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) (s 269C). The instrument provides a lower rate of customs duty for goods that are subject to a TCO. Section 269F of the Act allows an application for a TCO to be made by a person. If the application is for goods not specified in section 269SJ, which lists goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide if the application meets the core criteria (s 269C). Section 269P(3) of the Act requires the CEO to make a written TCO if satisfied that the application meets the criteria. In this case, TCO No. 0700808 was made on 10 April 2007, declaring that certain compression ignition engine truck chassis are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies, given that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia (s 269P(3)).
The obligations imposed by the Customs Act 1901 on the parties governed by this legislation include the requirement for the CEO to publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any person who believes there are reasons why the TCO should not be made (s 269K(1)). In this instance, the CEO did not receive any submissions in response to the invitation. The CEO must also ensure that the TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) in a way that disadvantages them or imposes liabilities for actions taken before the TCO registration date (s 269S(1)). The rights of importers are beneficially affected under this instrument, and they can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day the TCO is taken to have come into force (Reg. 126(1)(r)).
In terms of offences, penalties, and consequences for breach, the Customs Act 1901 does not explicitly outline specific penalties for non-compliance with the TCO process itself. However, general penalties for breaches of the Customs Act 1901 can include fines and imprisonment. For instance, under section 243 of the Act, any person who wilfully contravenes any provision of the Act or the Regulations is liable to a penalty of up to 10,000 penalty units, which is a substantial fine. Furthermore, in cases of serious breaches, individuals may face imprisonment for up to two years, as stipulated under section 243 of the Act. Additionally, any person who knowingly makes a false statement or representation in an application for a TCO may be subject to prosecution under the general false statement provisions of the Act.