EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0619499
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
The Smiths Snackfood Company Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain digital laser sorters on 08 December 2006.
Instrument
TCO No 0619499 was made on 02 March 2007. It declares that those certain digital laser sorters are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0619499 is taken to have come into force on 08 December 2006.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, provides a framework for the regulation of imports and exports, including the imposition of customs duties. It establishes a mechanism through which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) can be made to reduce or eliminate customs duty on specific goods. The primary purpose of this legislation is to facilitate the import of goods that are either not produced in Australia or for which suitable alternatives are not readily available, thus supporting trade and economic activities. The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0619499, made on 02 March 2007, applies to certain digital laser sorters and exempts them from the general rate of duty, which is 5%, by granting them a free rate under the Customs Tariff Act 1995. The instrument was introduced following an application by the Smiths Snackfood Company Ltd and was effective from 08 December 2006, the date the application was lodged. No submissions were received in opposition to the TCO, indicating a general acceptance of the tariff concession.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901 applies to individuals and entities involved in the importation of goods into Australia, encompassing various industries and transactions where customs duties are applicable. The Act allows the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to grant Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) to provide lower rates of customs duty on certain goods. This applies to goods for which no substitutable goods are produced in Australia, as outlined in section 269C. TCO No. 0619499, made on 2 March 2007, specifically provides a concession on certain digital laser sorters, reducing their customs duty from the general rate of 5% to free, contingent upon meeting the specified criteria. The Act's application is national in scope, impacting all jurisdictions within Australia. The TCO does not disadvantage any person other than the Commonwealth and does not impose liabilities on any person for actions taken before the commencement date of the order. Any exclusions or limitations are detailed in section 269SJ, which specifies goods that cannot be subject to a TCO.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVA, facilitates the issuance of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to apply a lower rate of customs duty on certain goods. Section 269F allows for applications to be submitted by individuals or entities for a TCO regarding specific goods. If the CEO determines that the application pertains to goods not listed in section 269SJ, they must assess whether the application meets the core criteria as outlined in section 269C. The core criteria necessitate that, on the day the application is submitted, no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Definitions of "goods produced in Australia," "ordinary course of business," and "substitutable goods" are provided in sections 269D, 269E, and 269F respectively.
Entities or individuals applying for a TCO must ensure their application complies with the specified criteria, including the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. The CEO must make a written order if the application meets the core criteria, as stipulated in section 269P(3). This order specifies the prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 that applies to the goods, thereby establishing the reduced rate of customs duty. For instance, the TCO No. 0619499, issued on 02 March 2007, declared that certain digital laser sorters are subject to item 50 of Schedule 4, resulting in a duty-free status for these goods, previously subject to a 5% duty.
Upon accepting a valid TCO application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette inviting any interested party to submit objections, as per subsection 269K(1). If no submissions are received, the CEO proceeds to issue the TCO. A TCO is effective from the date the application is lodged, as per subsection 269S(1). Consequently, TCO No. 0619499 is effective from 08 December 2006, the date of application. Importantly, a TCO does not retroactively affect the rights of any person, except the Commonwealth, ensuring that it does not disadvantage or impose liabilities for actions taken before the TCO’s effective date.
The issuance of a TCO can have significant financial implications for importers, allowing them to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO’s effective date, as per paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations. However, the TCO does not impose any new liabilities on any person. Failure to comply with the provisions of the Customs Act 1901 or the associated regulations may result in civil or criminal penalties. For example, section 273 of the Act provides for penalties for non-compliance, which can include substantial fines and, in some cases, imprisonment. The specifics of these penalties can vary depending on the nature and severity of the breach.