EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0619086
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Trojan Transport Spares (Aust) Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain reinforced rubber hose on 29 November 2006.
Instrument
TCO No 0619086 was made on 02 March 2007. It declares that those certain reinforced rubber hoses are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0619086 is taken to have come into force on 29 November 2006.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, establishes a framework for the administration of customs duties and the regulation of imports and exports. The Act provides for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, which allow for a lower rate of customs duty on certain goods if specific criteria are met. Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0619086, made on 02 March 2007, addresses the issue of applying tariff concessions to certain reinforced rubber hoses, following an application by Trojan Transport Spares (Aust) Pty Ltd on 29 November 2006. The instrument declares that the specified goods are subject to a zero rate of duty as no substitutable goods were produced in Australia at the time of the application, thus meeting the core criteria outlined in the Act. This legislative instrument ensures that the rights of importers are positively affected and allows for potential refunds of duty for those who imported the goods since the TCO is deemed to have come into force on the application date.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0619086 under the Customs Act 1901 applies to the specific category of goods, certain reinforced rubber hoses, as determined by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO). This instrument facilitates tariff concessions for these goods, providing a lower rate of customs duty for those imported under the terms of the Tariff Concession Order (TCO). The application for such concessions is governed by the provisions of Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901, where an applicant must satisfy the core criteria, notably that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. The CEO, in this case, was satisfied that the application met the criteria, leading to the issuance of the TCO on 2 March 2007, effective from 29 November 2006, the date of the application. The TCO is applicable nationally across Australia, aligning with the overarching provisions of the Customs Act 1901, and does not disadvantage any person or impose liabilities on anyone except the Commonwealth. The order exempts the applicant, Trojan Transport Spares (Aust) Pty Ltd, from the general rate of duty of 5% on these goods, allowing them to import these goods duty-free.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) and the associated Tariff Concession Order (TCO) No. 0619086 outline the procedure for tariff concessions on certain goods. Under section 269F, a person can apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO in respect of goods, provided these goods are not specified in section 269SJ, which excludes certain goods from TCO eligibility. If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets the core criteria specified in section 269C, they must make a written order declaring the goods subject to the TCO. This declaration attaches the goods to a specific item in Schedule 4 of the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff), thereby applying a lower rate of customs duty. For instance, TCO No. 0619086, made on 2 March 2007, applies to certain reinforced rubber hoses, attaching them to item 50 of Schedule 4 of the Tariff, which results in a duty rate of free, as opposed to the general rate of 5%.
The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties involved. The applicant must ensure that their application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ and must provide sufficient evidence that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia on the day the application was lodged, as defined in sections 269B, 269C, and 269D. The CEO, on receiving the application, must publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any interested parties, as required by subsection 269K(1). Additionally, the CEO must assess the application against the core criteria and make a decision on whether to grant the TCO. Should the CEO decide to make a TCO, they must do so in writing, specifying the item in Schedule 4 of the Tariff to which the goods are subject, as outlined in subsection 269P(3). The TCO, once made, is taken to have come into force on the day the application was lodged, as stipulated in subsection 269S(1).
Failure to comply with the requirements set out in the Act and the TCO can result in legal consequences. While the Act does not specify particular offences, non-compliance with the conditions of the TCO or the provisions of the Customs Act may lead to civil or criminal penalties. For instance, knowingly importing goods that do not qualify for a TCO or misrepresenting information in an application could result in fines or imprisonment. The exact penalties depend on the nature and severity of the breach but could include substantial fines under the Customs Act, as well as potential imprisonment terms. It is important for all parties to adhere to the legal framework to avoid these adverse consequences.