EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0618673
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Kone Elevators Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain elevator winches on 20 November 2006.
Instrument
TCO No 0618673 was made on 09 February 2007. It declares that those certain elevator winches are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0618673 is taken to have come into force on 20 November 2006.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, provides a framework for the application of customs duties and includes provisions for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). These orders are designed to address the issue of reducing customs duty on certain goods under specific circumstances. The 2007 Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0618673, made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, exemplifies this framework in action. It was introduced to address the specific issue of Kone Elevators Pty Ltd's application for tariff concessions on certain elevator winches. The policy objective is to facilitate trade by potentially reducing the duty burden on goods, provided they meet the core criteria outlined in the Act, such as the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. This legislative measure ensures that importers can benefit from lower customs duties, thereby promoting economic efficiency and competitiveness in the market.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, as supplemented by Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), applies to the importation of goods for which a tariff concession has been granted by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. This legislation is designed to lower the rate of customs duty on specific goods when certain criteria are met, primarily to promote trade and economic efficiency. The Act applies to any individual or entity seeking to import goods that are eligible for tariff concessions. Its jurisdictional reach is national, operating under the authority of the Commonwealth of Australia. However, the Act excludes goods specified in section 269SJ of the Customs Act 1901, which cannot be subject to a TCO, such as those that may pose a risk to public health or safety. The scope of application may also be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, such as regulations that may further define the conditions under which a TCO can be applied. The explanatory statement notes that the TCO does not affect existing rights or impose liabilities on individuals or entities for actions taken prior to the order's effective date, ensuring that the transition to lower duty rates is smooth and does not unfairly disadvantage those who have already engaged in import activities.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901 establishes a framework for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which are detailed in Part XVA. Section 269F outlines the process for applying for a TCO, where an individual or entity may submit an application to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for reduced customs duty on specific goods. For the application to be considered, it must not pertain to goods outlined in section 269SJ, which are ineligible for TCOs. Once an application is deemed valid, the CEO must determine whether it meets the core criteria specified in section 269C. This determination hinges on whether, on the date the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were being produced in Australia under ordinary business operations. The definitions for terms like 'goods produced in Australia', 'ordinary course of business', and'substitutable goods' are provided in sections 269D, 269E, and 269F respectively.
The obligations under the Act require the CEO to carefully assess each TCO application against the core criteria. This involves verifying that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia at the time the application was made. Once these criteria are satisfied, the CEO must issue a written TCO as specified in section 269P(3). This order formally declares that the goods in question are subject to a prescribed item in Schedule 4 of the Customs Tariff Act 1995, thereby applying a reduced duty rate. The CEO is also mandated to publish a notice in the Gazette inviting public submissions on the application, as outlined in section 269K(1). This transparency measure ensures that all interested parties have an opportunity to voice any objections before a TCO is finalised.
In the case of TCO No. 0618673, Kone Elevators Pty Ltd applied for tariff concessions on certain elevator winches on 20 November 2006. After reviewing the application and confirming it met the core criteria, the CEO issued the TCO on 09 February 2007, declaring that these specific elevator winches were subject to a duty rate of zero percent under item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff. This concession came into effect on the date the application was lodged, as per subsection 269S(1). The TCO does not retroactively affect any rights or liabilities of parties other than the Commonwealth, ensuring that existing rights remain intact. Importers, however, can benefit by applying for duty refunds on goods imported since the TCO's effective date, as permitted under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations.
Failure to comply with the requirements of the Customs Act 1901, including the submission of false information in a TCO application, can result in various penalties. While the specific penalties are not detailed in the provided text, they generally include fines and other sanctions that can be substantial. These penalties are designed to enforce compliance and maintain the integrity of the tariff concession scheme. The Act and accompanying regulations provide the legal basis for these enforcement actions, ensuring that the tariff concessions are applied fairly and appropriately.