Tariff Concession Order 0618515

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2007L00520 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0618515

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

Road Gear Australasia Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain car boot mats on 14 November 2006.

Instrument

TCO No 0618515 was made on 9 February 2007.  It declares that those certain car boot mats are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 10%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is 0%.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 0618515 is taken to have come into force on 14 November 2006.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, outlines the framework within which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) can be issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO). The Act was introduced to address the need for a mechanism to provide tariff concessions on certain imported goods, promoting fair trade practices and economic efficiency by allowing the import of goods at reduced customs duty rates under specific conditions. The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0618515, made on 9 February 2007, was designed to apply a zero percent duty rate on certain car boot mats, as no substitutable goods were produced in Australia at the time of the application. The instrument came into effect on 14 November 2006, the date on which the application was lodged, and provides benefits to importers by allowing them to apply for duty refunds on goods imported since that date. Importantly, the TCO does not affect the rights of any person or impose liabilities on anyone in respect of actions taken before its registration.

Scope and Application

The Customs Act 1901, specifically Part XVA, allows for the establishment of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, enabling reduced customs duties on certain goods. An application for a TCO can be made by any person provided that the goods in question are not specified in section 269SJ of the Act and meet the core criteria outlined in sections 269C, 269B, and 269D. The Act applies to goods that are subject to a TCO application and are not substitutable goods produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. The TCO process involves the CEO making a written order if satisfied that the application meets the criteria, and the concession applies to the specific goods as outlined in the order. For example, in TCO No. 0618515, certain car boot mats were granted a TCO, reducing their duty rate from 10% to 0%. The TCO applies nationally, affecting the rights of importers who can now apply for a refund of duty on imports since the effective date of the TCO, without imposing any liabilities on third parties.

Key Provisions

The Customs Act 1901 (section 269F) allows an application to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) in relation to specific goods. If the CEO determines that the application does not pertain to goods specified in section 269SJ, which are ineligible for a TCO, the CEO must assess whether the application meets the core criteria. A TCO application satisfies the core criteria if, on the day the application is submitted, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business (section 269C). Definitions of key terms such as "goods produced in Australia," "ordinary course of business," and "substitutable goods" are provided in sections 269D, 269E, and 269B respectively. If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets these criteria, they must issue a written order (section 269P(3)), which will declare that the goods in question are subject to a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995. For example, TCO No. 0618515 declared that certain car boot mats are subject to item 50 of Schedule 4, with a rate of duty reduced from 10% to 0%. The obligations imposed by the Customs Act 1901 on parties involved include the requirement for the CEO to publish a notice in the Gazette, inviting any person who believes there are reasons why a TCO should not be made to submit their views (subsection 269K(1)). This ensures transparency and provides an opportunity for stakeholders to voice their concerns. In this case, the CEO did not receive any submissions. The TCO is deemed to come into force on the date the application was lodged (subsection 269S(1)), which in this instance was 14 November 2006. Importantly, the TCO does not affect the rights of any person, other than the Commonwealth, as at the date of registration, nor does it impose any liabilities on any person for actions taken before the registration date. Importers of the affected goods can apply for a refund of duty paid on those goods imported since the effective date of the TCO (paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations). Failure to comply with the provisions of the Customs Act 1901, including the process for applying for and obtaining a TCO, may result in various legal consequences. While specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the explanatory statement, breaches of the Customs Act can generally lead to civil or criminal penalties. The exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, but they could include fines, imprisonment, or other sanctions as prescribed by law. The act of making false statements or providing misleading information in an application for a TCO could also be subject to additional penalties, as such actions may be considered fraudulent and could result in more severe consequences.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.