EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0613896
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Delirium Development Consultants Pty Limited applied for a TCO in respect of certain utility tubs on 21 August 2006.
Instrument
TCO No 0613896 was made on 10 November 2006. It declares that those certain utility tubs are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0613896 is taken to have come into force on 21 August 2006.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, established a framework for tariff concessions that allow for reduced customs duties on certain goods. This legislation was introduced to address the need for economic flexibility in import duties, allowing for the reduction of duties on goods that cannot be produced domestically, thereby supporting industries and consumers by making certain products more affordable. Tariff Concession Order No. 0613896, issued under the authority of the Customs Act, aims to provide a tariff concession for certain utility tubs, reducing their duty rate from the general 5% to free, effective from 21 August 2006. This measure ensures that importers of these goods can benefit from the reduced duty rate and potentially claim refunds for duties paid prior to the concession's effective date, without any imposition of new liabilities on the importers or other stakeholders.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0613896 pertains to the Customs Act 1901, which governs the application of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO). This legislation applies to any person or entity that applies for a TCO for goods, ensuring that such applications are assessed against specific criteria before a concession can be granted. The scope of the Act extends to all goods not specified in section 269SJ, which outlines goods ineligible for TCOs, and encompasses the general principle that no substitutable goods must be produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. The instrument impacts the importation of certain utility tubs, as evidenced by Delirium Development Consultants Pty Limited's application, where the CEO determined a free rate of duty as opposed to the general rate of 5%. The Act operates nationally within Australia, as it is part of the federal customs legislation. Any exclusions or exemptions are explicitly stated within the Act, and subordinate instruments may further define or extend the application of the TCOs. The commencement of TCO No. 0613896 is effective from 21 August 2006, the date the application was lodged, with no retroactive application to disadvantage or impose liabilities on parties prior to the registration of the TCO.
Key Provisions
The key provisions of this legislation revolve around the process and criteria for the establishment of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) under the Customs Act 1901. Section 269F allows an individual or entity to apply to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs for a TCO, provided the goods in question are not excluded under section 269SJ. Section 269C stipulates that a TCO application meets the core criteria if no substitutable goods were produced in Australia on the day the application was lodged. Definitions for terms such as "goods produced in Australia," "ordinary course of business," and "substitutable goods" are provided in sections 269D, 269E, and 269B respectively. If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets the core criteria, they must make a written order under section 269P(3), declaring the goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 applies.
The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties or entities it governs include the requirement for applicants to ensure that their applications for a TCO meet the core criteria outlined in section 269C. This involves demonstrating that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged. The CEO is required to publish a notice in the Gazette under subsection 269K(1) once an application is accepted as valid, inviting submissions from any person who believes there are reasons why the TCO should not be made. The CEO must also consider any submissions received and decide whether to make the TCO. The Act further ensures that the TCO does not affect the rights of any person as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities in respect of anything done or omitted before the date of registration.
The Act does not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties for breaches within the provided sections. However, any failure to comply with the provisions of the Act or the regulations, such as submitting false information in a TCO application, could potentially lead to legal consequences under the broader framework of the Customs Act 1901. For instance, providing false or misleading information in a TCO application could be seen as an offence under section 228 of the Act, which carries a penalty of a fine of up to 10,000 penalty units or imprisonment for up to five years, or both, depending on the severity and intent of the offence. It is essential for applicants and the CEO to adhere strictly to the legislative requirements to avoid any legal repercussions.