EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0611590
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
TDU Pty Limited applied for a TCO in respect of certain water cooled chillers on 10 July 2006.
Instrument
TCO No 0611590 was made on 29 September 2006. It declares that those certain water cooled chillers are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0611590 is taken to have come into force on 10 July 2006.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, establishes a framework for the regulation of imports and exports, including the imposition of customs duty on imported goods. Part XVA of this Act provides for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) which can reduce the customs duty rate for certain goods under specific circumstances. Specifically, TCOs can be applied for by individuals or entities seeking a lower duty rate for goods not produced in Australia and for which no substitutable goods are being produced domestically. The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0611590 was introduced to address the issue of ensuring that the importation of specific goods, in this case certain water-cooled chillers, is facilitated by providing a zero customs duty rate for these items. This was achieved through the application and subsequent approval of a TCO by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, who found that no substitutable goods were being produced in Australia. This legislative measure aims to promote the importation of essential goods by reducing financial barriers, thereby benefiting importers who can now claim refunds on duties paid prior to the TCO's effective date.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0611590 under the Customs Act 1901 applies to individuals or entities seeking tariff concessions for specific goods, in this case, certain water-cooled chillers, from the Commonwealth. The application of this instrument is contingent on the core criteria outlined in the Customs Act, specifically ensuring that the goods in question are not substitutable by any products manufactured in Australia. This Act allows the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to issue a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) if the application meets the criteria, resulting in a reduced or free customs duty rate on the specified goods. This particular TCO, which was published on 29 September 2006, applies to the general rate of duty on these chillers, reducing it from 5% to free. The instrument's effect is prospective, meaning it does not affect the rights or liabilities of any person with respect to actions taken before its registration, although it does allow for duty refunds for importers of the goods from the date the TCO is considered to have come into force. The Customs Act's scope extends nationally across Australia, and while the Act provides for subordinate instruments to extend or modify its application, this specific TCO does not introduce any such extensions or restrictions.
Key Provisions
The primary sections of Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0611590 (TCO No. 0611590) under the Customs Act 1901 (section 269F) involve the application and granting of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). A TCO application is processed by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (section 269C) if it meets the core criteria, which include the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia at the time of application (section 269P(3)). Specifically, TCO No. 0611590, made on 29 September 2006, pertains to certain water-cooled chillers. The instrument declares these chillers to be subject to item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995, thereby applying a zero rate of duty instead of the general 5% duty rate.
The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties involved include the requirement for applicants to ensure their applications meet the core criteria, particularly concerning the non-production of substitutable goods in Australia (section 269D). The CEO must then make a written order if the application meets these criteria (section 269P(3)). Additionally, the CEO is required to publish a notice in the Gazette (section 269K(1)) to invite submissions from interested parties regarding the application. In this case, no submissions were received, which may have influenced the CEO's decision to proceed with the TCO.
The TCO itself comes into effect on the day the application was lodged (section 269S(1)), which in this instance was 10 July 2006. Importantly, the TCO does not retroactively affect the rights of any person or impose any liabilities for actions taken before the registration date (section 269S(1)). Instead, it benefits importers by allowing them to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the effective date of the TCO (Regulation 126(1)(r)).
In terms of potential breaches and consequences, the Act does not specify particular offences or penalties for failing to comply with the terms of a TCO or its application process. However, any actions taken in contravention of the Customs Act 1901 could lead to civil or criminal penalties as outlined in other sections of the Act. The absence of submissions in this case does not suggest any immediate penalties, but ongoing compliance with the Act's requirements is crucial to avoid any future legal repercussions.