EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0609675
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Sugar Australia Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain deflagration suppressors on 01 June 2006.
Instrument
TCO No 0609675 was made on 18 August 2006. It declares that those certain deflagration suppressors are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0609675 is taken to have come into force on 01 June 2006.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0609675 was enacted in 2006 under the Customs Act 1901, which provides a framework for the application and granting of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. This legislative instrument was introduced to address the issue of providing tariff concessions for specific goods, such as deflagration suppressors, to promote fair trade practices and to ensure that Australian businesses can compete effectively in the global market. The policy objective behind this legislation is to facilitate the importation of goods that are not produced domestically by reducing the applicable customs duty, thus encouraging economic growth and supporting industries that rely on these imported goods.
The instrument was developed following an application by Sugar Australia Pty Ltd for a tariff concession on certain deflagration suppressors, which are used in the sugar industry. After the Chief Executive Officer of Customs was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia, a written order was made, and the application for the tariff concession was approved. This decision was made in accordance with the core criteria outlined in the Customs Act 1901, ensuring that the application was valid and met the necessary conditions. The instrument came into effect on 1 June 2006, the date on which the application was lodged, and it provides for the goods in question to be subject to a duty rate of free, down from the general rate of 5%.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0609675, made under the Customs Act 1901, applies to specific goods—namely, certain deflagration suppressors—that are subject to a Tariff Concession Order (TCO). This legislation primarily affects entities and individuals involved in the importation of these goods, providing them with a lower rate of customs duty. The instrument was made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) after an application by Sugar Australia Pty Ltd and is effective from 1 June 2006, the date on which the application was lodged. The TCO applies to these goods as no substitutable goods were produced in Australia at the time the application was made, satisfying the core criteria set out in the Act. This instrument benefits importers of these goods by providing a rate of duty that is free, whereas the general rate of duty for such goods is 5%. The instrument’s scope is limited to the goods specified in the TCO, and it does not affect the rights of any person other than the Commonwealth or impose any liabilities on such persons in respect of actions taken before the registration date.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901, particularly Part XVA, outlines the procedure for issuing Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) as explained in the Explanatory Statement for Instrument No. 0609675. Section 269F (1) allows any person to apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO in respect of certain goods. The CEO must then assess if the application is valid, which involves determining if the goods are not those listed in section 269SJ that cannot be subject to a TCO. If the application is valid, the CEO evaluates whether it meets the core criteria specified in section 269C, which requires that, on the date of the application, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Sections 269B, 269D, and 269E provide definitions pertinent to this assessment, including what constitutes goods produced in Australia and the ordinary course of business.
The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties involved are primarily on the CEO. The CEO must, upon receiving a valid TCO application, determine whether it meets the core criteria and, if satisfied, issue a written order as per section 269P(3). This order specifies the lower customs duty rate for the goods in question. In this instance, the CEO was satisfied that the application for deflagration suppressors met the core criteria, leading to the issuance of TCO No. 0609675. Moreover, the CEO must also consult with the public by publishing a notice in the Gazette inviting any interested parties to submit objections to the TCO, as per section 269K(1). In this case, no submissions were received, facilitating the swift implementation of the TCO.
Section 269S(1) stipulates that a TCO is effective from the date the application is lodged, meaning TCO No. 0609675 came into force on 1 June 2006. This commencement date ensures that importers can benefit from the reduced duty rates without retroactive liabilities. Importantly, section 126(1)(r) of the Regulations allows importers to apply for a refund of duty paid on goods imported since the TCO's effective date. Additionally, the TCO does not disadvantage any person or impose new liabilities on them concerning actions taken before the TCO's registration, safeguarding existing rights and obligations. Any breaches of the provisions or failure to comply with the TCO's requirements could result in penalties, although the specific consequences are not detailed in the provided text.