EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0607044
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Engel Distribution Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain compression refrigerators on 20 April 2006.
Instrument
TCO No 0607044 was made on 7 July 2006. It declares that those certain compression refrigerators are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0607044 is taken to have come into force on 20 April 2006.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to manage the importation and exportation of goods, including the imposition of customs duties. The Act provides for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which can lower the rate of customs duty on specific goods. The 2006 Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0607044 was introduced to address the specific need for tariff concessions on certain compression refrigerators, as applied for by Engel Distribution Pty Ltd. This instrument was made under the authority of the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, who, after determining that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia, issued the concession. The primary policy objective is to facilitate the importation of goods by reducing the customs duty, thereby potentially lowering costs for importers and possibly consumers. This measure ensures that the rights of importers are not adversely affected and allows for duty refunds on qualifying goods imported since the effective date of the concession.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, as outlined in Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0607044, applies to any person or entity seeking tariff concessions for specific goods imported into Australia. The legislation enables the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to consider and grant Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) to applicants provided the goods do not fall under the restricted list specified in section 269SJ and the core criteria are met, such as the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. The TCO in question applies to Engel Distribution Pty Ltd's application for certain compression refrigerators, granting them a tariff concession where the general duty rate is 5%, but for these specific goods, the duty is free. The geographic reach of this legislation is national, affecting customs duties across Australia, as the concessions are applicable to goods entering the country. The Act does not disadvantage any persons or entities by imposing liabilities for actions taken prior to the registration of the TCO, and it allows for the refund of duties paid on the specified goods since the effective date of the application, which is the date the application was lodged.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901 (the Act) allows for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) under Part XVA. These orders enable a lower rate of customs duty on specific goods, as outlined in section 269F. To apply for a TCO, an individual or entity must submit an application to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). The CEO must then determine if the application meets the core criteria set out in section 269C, which involves ensuring that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia on the day the application is lodged. "Substitutable goods" are defined in section 269D as goods produced in Australia that can be used in the same way as the goods subject to the TCO application.
The obligations imposed by the Act on the CEO include verifying that the application is not for goods specified in section 269SJ, which are ineligible for a TCO. Once the CEO is satisfied that the application meets the core criteria, they must issue a written order as a TCO under section 269P(3). This order specifies that the goods in question are subject to a particular item in Schedule 4 of the Customs Tariff Act 1995, effectively applying a reduced rate of duty. In this instance, Engel Distribution Pty Ltd successfully applied for a TCO for certain compression refrigerators on 20 April 2006, and TCO No. 0607044 was issued on 7 July 2006, declaring that these refrigerators are subject to item 50 of Schedule 4, with a duty rate of free, down from the general rate of 5%.
The Act also requires the CEO to publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any interested parties who believe the TCO should not be made, as per subsection 269K(1). In the case of TCO No. 0607044, no submissions were received in response to this invitation. The TCO is considered to have come into force on the date the application was lodged, which in this case was 20 April 2006, as per subsection 269S(1). Importantly, the TCO does not affect the rights of any person other than the Commonwealth as of the date of registration, and it does not impose any liabilities on any person. Importers of the affected goods can benefit from this order by applying for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO's effective date under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations.
In terms of enforcement, the Act does not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties for breaches related to the issuance or misuse of a TCO. However, general provisions within the Customs Act and associated regulations might impose penalties for non-compliance with customs regulations, which could include fines or imprisonment depending on the severity of the breach. It is essential for entities subject to the Act to adhere to the stipulated requirements to avoid any potential legal ramifications.