EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0606835
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
G.M.Baden Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain mobile crane cabins on 11 April 2006.
Instrument
TCO No 0606835 was made on 7 July 2006. It declares that those certain mobile crane cabins are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is 0%.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0606835 is taken to have come into force on 11 April 2006.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0606835, enacted in 2006, pertains to the Customs Act 1901. This instrument was introduced to address the need for facilitating tariff concessions for certain imported goods under specific conditions, thereby reducing the customs duty rate for those goods. Enacted by the Australian Government through the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, the policy objective is to ensure that tariff concessions are granted when no substitutable goods are produced in Australia, thereby fostering fair trade practices and potentially benefiting the importer by lowering their duty obligations.
The instrument, which came into effect on 11 April 2006, was made in response to an application by G.M. Baden Pty Ltd for tariff concessions on certain mobile crane cabins. The Customs Act 1901 outlines the process and criteria for such applications, and after satisfying the core criteria, the CEO issued the concession reducing the duty rate from 5% to 0%. This instrument ensures that no pre-existing rights or liabilities are adversely affected by its implementation, and importers can potentially apply for refunds of duty paid prior to the instrument's effective date.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0606835 under the Customs Act 1901 applies to entities seeking a lower rate of customs duty on specific goods through the Tariff Concession Orders (TCO) scheme. This Act facilitates applications for TCOs by entities such as businesses or individuals who wish to import certain goods into Australia without incurring the usual customs duty. The instrument specifically applies to mobile crane cabins as declared in TCO No. 0606835, reducing the duty rate from 5% to 0% for these goods. The application of this legislation is national in scope, as it falls under the purview of the Commonwealth. The Act stipulates that the Chief Executive Officer of Customs must ensure that the goods in question are not subject to the exclusions listed in section 269SJ of the Act and must confirm that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. The Act also mandates the publication of TCO applications in the Gazette, inviting submissions from the public, although in this case, no submissions were received. The instrument's commencement is retroactive to the date the application was lodged, which in this instance was 11 April 2006, ensuring that importers may apply for duty refunds on goods imported since that date.
Key Provisions
The primary sections of the Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0606835 (referred to as the TCO) under the Customs Act 1901, require the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) to assess applications for Tariff Concession Orders (TCO) (sections 269F and 269C). If the application meets the core criteria—specifically, that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the date the application was lodged—the CEO must make a written order, which is the TCO, declaring the goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 applies (section 269P(3)). This TCO applies a reduced rate of customs duty, in this case, a reduction from the general rate of 5% to 0% for certain mobile crane cabins.
The obligations imposed by this Act on the parties it governs are primarily administrative and procedural. The CEO is required to publish a notice in the Gazette as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as valid, inviting any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission (subsection 269K(1)). In this case, the CEO did not receive any submissions in response to the notice. Additionally, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria by verifying that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged. The CEO must also ensure that the TCO does not disadvantage any person other than the Commonwealth or impose any liabilities on any person in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.
Failure to comply with the requirements of the Act or the TCO may result in civil or criminal consequences. Specifically, under section 283-35 of the Customs Act 1901, a person who contravenes a provision of the Act is liable to a penalty of up to 10,000 penalty units, or in the case of a continuing failure, up to 500 penalty units for each day of the failure. In the case of the TCO, if a person knowingly provides false or misleading information in an application for a TCO, they may be subject to a penalty of up to 10,000 penalty units. Additionally, if a person imports goods that are subject to a TCO without paying the appropriate duty, they may be subject to a penalty of up to 10,000 penalty units. These penalties are in addition to any other civil or criminal consequences that may apply under other provisions of the Act.