Tariff Concession Order 0605045

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2006L01649 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0605045

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

G James Australia Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain billet containers on 10 March 2006.

Instrument

TCO No 0605045 was made on 19 May 2006.  It declares that those certain billet containers are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

 

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 0605045 is taken to have come into force on 10 March 2006.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, provides a framework for the administration of customs duties and regulations, including the establishment of a scheme for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) under Part XVA. The 2006 Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0605045, made under the authority of the Customs Act 1901, addresses the need to provide tariff relief on certain imported goods by reducing or eliminating customs duty for those goods. This particular instrument, concerning billet containers, was introduced following an application by G James Australia Pty Ltd and aims to ensure that importers of these specific goods are not subjected to duty if they are not domestically produced. The policy objective behind this concession is to support the importation of goods that are not produced in Australia, thereby potentially lowering costs for businesses and consumers and encouraging the use of imported goods in specific applications. The instrument took effect on the date of the application, 10 March 2006, and no submissions were received in opposition to the concession, as indicated by the notice published in the Gazette.

Scope and Application

The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0605045, issued under the Customs Act 1901, applies specifically to the granting of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) for certain billet containers. This instrument is applicable to entities or individuals who seek lower rates of customs duty for goods imported into Australia. The Act facilitates the application process for TCOs by allowing the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to make such orders if certain criteria are met, namely that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. This concession is beneficial to importers of the specified goods, potentially allowing them to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day the TCO came into force. The application of this legislation is national in scope, impacting all entities involved in the importation of the specified goods within Australia. However, the Act does not affect the rights of any person other than the Commonwealth concerning activities conducted prior to the registration of the TCO. The instrument does not impose any liabilities on individuals or entities for actions taken before the TCO was registered. The scope of the Act can be extended or further defined through subordinate instruments, which may provide additional regulations or guidelines on the implementation and application of TCOs.

Key Provisions

The Customs Act 1901, particularly Part XVA, allows for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs, under section 269F. When a person applies for a TCO in respect of certain goods, the CEO must first confirm that the goods are not listed in section 269SJ, which specifies goods that cannot be subject to a TCO. If the application is valid, the CEO assesses whether it meets the core criteria under section 269C, which requires that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged. Definitions for key terms such as 'goods produced in Australia', 'ordinary course of business', and'substitutable goods' are provided in sections 269D, 269E, and 269B respectively. Upon meeting the core criteria, the CEO must issue a written order under subsection 269P(3), declaring that the goods in question are subject to a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995. This process was followed for G James Australia Pty Ltd's application for certain billet containers, which was approved as TCO No. 0605045 on 19 May 2006. The CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia, leading to the decision that these goods are subject to item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff, with a duty rate of free instead of the general rate of 5%. Entities subject to the Act must adhere to the process for applying for a TCO, ensuring their applications are valid and meet the core criteria as outlined in the Act. They must also engage with any consultation processes, such as responding to any submissions made by other parties in relation to their TCO application. The CEO is required to publish notices in the Gazette under subsection 269K(1) inviting submissions from interested parties, as was done for TCO No. 0605045, although no submissions were received in this case. In terms of penalties and consequences, the Act does not explicitly state the penalties for non-compliance with the TCO process or for providing false information in an application. However, any breach of the Act's provisions could potentially lead to civil or criminal liability, depending on the nature and severity of the breach. The precise consequences would be determined based on the specific circumstances and the applicable laws at the time of the breach.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Licensing & Registration
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.