Tariff Concession Order 0604918

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2006L01526 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0604918

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

Bluescope Steel Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain scrap discharge conveyor belt on 3 March 2006.

Instrument

TCO No 0604918 was made on 12 May 2006.  It declares that those certain scrap discharge conveyor belt are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

 

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 0604918 is taken to have come into force on 3 March 2006.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0604918 was enacted in 2006 under the Customs Act 1901 to address the need for tariff concessions on certain goods that are not produced in Australia and do not have substitutable domestic alternatives. This instrument was created to facilitate the application process for tariff concessions by allowing the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to grant lower rates of customs duty on specified goods, in this case, certain scrap discharge conveyor belts. The objective of this legislative instrument is to encourage the importation of goods that are not locally produced, thereby potentially lowering costs for businesses and consumers while also supporting trade. The instrument was developed in response to an application by Bluescope Steel Ltd and came into force on the date of the application, 3 March 2006, with no retroactive disadvantages or liabilities imposed on persons other than the Commonwealth.

Scope and Application

The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0604918 under the Customs Act 1901 applies to entities that seek to import goods eligible for a lower rate of customs duty, specifically focusing on goods that are not produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. This Act provides for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) to be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, effectively reducing or eliminating the duty on specific imported goods, as in the case of certain scrap discharge conveyor belts. The instrument extends its reach to any goods that meet the criteria outlined in the Customs Act, with the primary condition being that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. The instrument applies across the Commonwealth, thereby affecting all states and territories within Australia. Notably, the TCO does not disadvantage any person by imposing liabilities for actions taken before the order's registration and does not affect the rights of individuals or entities other than the Commonwealth. The rights of importers, however, are beneficially affected, allowing them to apply for a refund of duty on the specified goods imported since the TCO's effective date. The legislation also provides for the publication of notices and invitations for submissions, although in this case, no submissions were received.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of this legislation focus on the process for applying for and granting a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) under the Customs Act 1901 (the Act). Section 269F (1) allows a person to apply to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs for a TCO in respect of specific goods. To be eligible for a TCO, the goods must meet the core criteria set out in section 269C. This criterion requires that, on the day the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. The CEO must also ensure that the goods are not specified in section 269SJ, which lists goods that cannot be subject to a TCO. If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets the core criteria, they must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods are subject to a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff), as outlined in section 269P(3). The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties involved are primarily on Bluescope Steel Ltd, which applied for the TCO, and the CEO, who must assess the application and decide whether to grant the TCO. Section 269K(1) requires the CEO to publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any interested parties within a reasonable timeframe. In this case, no submissions were received in response to the notice, which suggests the application process was transparent and unopposed. Additionally, subsection 269S(1) mandates that the TCO is to be taken as coming into force on the day the application was lodged, which was 3 March 2006 for this particular TCO. The legislation also outlines potential consequences for breaches. However, the Explanatory Statement does not specify any particular offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences related to the granting of this specific TCO. Generally, the Act does not impose liabilities on any person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of actions taken before the TCO registration date, as mentioned in the explanatory statement. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected, and they may apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO is taken to have come into force, under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations. This indicates a structured process with defined obligations and benefits, but no explicit penalties for non-compliance with the terms of the TCO.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Order
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.