EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0604679
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Bluescope Steel Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain coil cars on 3 March 2006.
Instrument
TCO No 0604679 was made on 19 May 2006. It declares that those certain coil cars are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0604679 is taken to have come into force on 3 March 2006.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was enacted to provide a framework for the administration of customs duties and other charges in Australia, among other things. To facilitate trade and economic efficiency, the Act allows for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) under section 269F, which offer lower rates of customs duty on specified goods. This initiative addresses the gap where certain imported goods could potentially be replaced by Australian-made products, thereby justifying the need for tariff concessions to encourage trade and maintain competitive balance. The enacting body, the Parliament of Australia, established this mechanism to streamline the process of applying for and granting tariff concessions through the CEO of Customs, thereby promoting a more efficient customs duty system. The policy objective behind this legislative provision is to facilitate the import of goods that are not produced in Australia, ensuring that Australian consumers and businesses have access to a broader range of competitively priced goods.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0604679, made under the Customs Act 1901, applies to specific goods for which an application for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) has been made and approved by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. This particular instrument pertains to certain coil cars and grants these goods a concession from the general rate of customs duty, reducing it from 5% to free. The application for this TCO was submitted by Bluescope Steel Ltd on 3 March 2006, and the instrument was registered on 19 May 2006, effective from the date of application. The scope of the legislation encompasses the specific goods outlined in the TCO, which are those not substituted by goods produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. The Act does not disadvantage any person by affecting their rights as at the date of the TCO's registration, nor does it impose any liabilities on individuals other than the Commonwealth. Importers of these goods will be eligible for duty refunds for imports made since the effective date of the TCO.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901 (the Act) establishes a framework for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) through Part XVA, as outlined in section 269F. When a person applies to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO in respect of goods, section 269SJ specifies that the application must not be for goods that are ineligible for a TCO. If the application is deemed valid, the CEO assesses whether it meets the core criteria under section 269C, which requires that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged.
The CEO’s obligations under the Act include ensuring that the application does not pertain to ineligible goods and that the core criteria are satisfied, which necessitates a determination that no substitutable goods were produced domestically. If these conditions are met, the CEO must issue a written TCO. Section 269P(3) further mandates that the TCO specify the prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 applicable to the goods. This process was followed in the case of TCO No. 0604679 for certain coil cars, where the CEO determined that the core criteria were satisfied, resulting in a TCO that exempts these goods from duty, effective from 3 March 2006.
Part of the CEO’s obligations also includes public consultation, as stipulated by subsection 269K(1) of the Act. This section requires the CEO to publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any interested parties regarding the TCO application. In the case of TCO No. 0604679, no submissions were received in response to the published notice. The commencement of the TCO, as per subsection 269S(1) of the Act, is effective from the date the application was lodged, which in this case was 3 March 2006.
Section 269P(3) of the Act outlines that if a TCO is issued, it does not adversely affect the rights of any person other than the Commonwealth as at the date of registration and does not impose any liabilities on them for actions taken prior to the registration. For TCO No. 0604679, this means that while importers can benefit from the duty exemption, no one will be disadvantaged or held liable for actions taken before the TCO’s effective date. Importers can also apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO came into force, under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations.