EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0604152
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Simplot Australia Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain frozen fish defrosting tunnels on 21 February 2006.
Instrument
TCO No 0604152 was made on 19 May 2006. It declares that those certain frozen fish defrosting tunnels are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0604152 is taken to have come into force on 21 February 2006.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0604152, enacted in 2006, addresses the need for the Customs Act 1901 to provide a streamlined process for granting tariff concessions on specific imported goods. The instrument was developed in response to an application by Simplot Australia Pty Ltd for tariff concessions on certain frozen fish defrosting tunnels, aiming to facilitate the importation of these goods at a reduced customs duty rate. The enactment of this instrument by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs under the authority granted by the Customs Act 1901, aligns with the policy objective of supporting Australian businesses by reducing the cost of importing goods that are not produced domestically, thereby encouraging trade and economic activity.
The instrument came into effect on 21 February 2006, the date on which the application was lodged, ensuring that the tariff concession would apply retroactively to imports of the specified goods from that date. The process involved the publication of a notice in the Gazette to allow for public submissions, though none were received in response. The instrument ensures that the rights of importers are beneficially affected and that no liabilities are imposed on any person as a result of its implementation.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901 provides a framework through which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) can be issued, enabling lower rates of customs duty to be applied to specified goods. This is managed under Part XVA of the Act, which allows the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to grant tariff concessions on application. The application process requires that the goods in question are not listed in section 269SJ of the Act, which excludes certain items from being subject to TCOs. For an application to be considered, it must meet the core criteria outlined in section 269C, which includes the condition that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia at the time of application. Entities or individuals, including businesses involved in importing goods, can apply for these concessions. The TCOs have a national reach, impacting the importation of specified goods across Australia. However, the Act does not disadvantage existing rights or impose new liabilities on persons other than the Commonwealth. The TCOs are effective from the date of application, with the order for frozen fish defrosting tunnels, for instance, taking effect from 21 February 2006, the date of the application. The CEO is required to publish notices in the Gazette inviting submissions on TCO applications, although no submissions were received for the order in question.
Key Provisions
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0604152, under the Customs Act 1901, sets forth the conditions for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) for certain frozen fish defrosting tunnels, specifying that these goods are subject to a free rate of customs duty as outlined in item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (paragraph 2). To be eligible for such a concession, the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) must determine that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the TCO application is lodged (sections 269C and 269P(3)). The CEO must also ensure that the application pertains to goods that are not specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which lists goods that cannot be subject to a TCO (section 269F). Once the CEO is satisfied that the application meets the core criteria, a written order is issued (section 269P(3)). In this case, Simplot Australia Pty Ltd's application for a TCO concerning certain frozen fish defrosting tunnels was approved on 19 May 2006, as no substitutable goods were being produced in Australia.
The Act imposes specific obligations on the CEO when processing a TCO application. Once an application is accepted as valid, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette, inviting any interested parties to submit reasons why the TCO should not be made (subsection 269K(1)). In the instance of TCO No. 0604152, the CEO did not receive any submissions opposing the concession. Additionally, the Act stipulates that a TCO comes into force on the day the application is lodged (subsection 269S(1)), which for TCO No. 0604152 was 21 February 2006. Importantly, the TCO does not affect the rights of any person other than the Commonwealth as of the registration date, nor does it impose any liabilities on such persons regarding actions taken before the registration date (subsection 269S(1)). Importers, however, stand to benefit from this concession as they can apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO's effective date (paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations).
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Customs Act 1901 and related regulations can result in civil or criminal penalties. While the explanatory statement does not specify offences or penalties related to TCOs, breaches of customs laws generally can lead to substantial fines and, in severe cases, imprisonment. For instance, under the Customs Act 1901, individuals or entities found guilty of contravening provisions related to customs duty can face fines up to $525,000 or imprisonment for up to five years, or both, for serious offences. Additionally, entities may incur civil penalties for incorrect declarations or failure to meet regulatory requirements, which can result in financial penalties or other enforcement actions. It is crucial, therefore, for all parties involved to adhere strictly to the statutory requirements and procedural obligations outlined in the Act.