EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0601576
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Hydro Aluminium Kurri Kurri Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain aluminum chlorine fluxing injectors on 29 December 2005.
Instrument
TCO No 0601576 was made on 24 March 2006. It declares that those certain aluminum chlorine fluxing injectors are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0601576 is taken to have come into force on 29 December 2005.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, establishes a framework within which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) can be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. These orders provide for a lower rate of customs duty on specified goods, aiming to support the economic viability and competitiveness of Australian businesses. The Act was introduced to address the need for tariff relief on goods where no substitutable products are produced domestically, thereby encouraging trade and investment. The policy objective is to facilitate smoother import processes and lower costs for businesses that rely on specific imported goods that are not produced locally, as exemplified by Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0601576 made on 24 March 2006. This particular instrument, which grants a tariff concession on certain aluminum chlorine fluxing injectors, was introduced following an application by Hydro Aluminium Kurri Kurri Pty Ltd, and it took effect from the date of the application, 29 December 2005.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0601576, made under the Customs Act 1901, applies to entities and individuals involved in the importation of specific goods, namely certain aluminum chlorine fluxing injectors. The legislation is concerned with the establishment of a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) which provides a lower rate of customs duty on the specified goods. This Act applies to any person who imports the designated goods and seeks to benefit from the tariff concession, thereby reducing the duty rate from the general rate of 5% to a free rate. The geographic reach of the Act is national, as it pertains to the importation of goods into Australia and is subject to the federal customs laws. The Act excludes goods specified in section 269SJ of the Customs Act, which cannot be subject to a TCO. The Act’s application may be extended or modified through subordinate instruments as necessary to adjust to changing economic conditions or trade policies.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901 (the Act) provides a framework through which the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) can grant Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) (section 269F). These orders apply a lower rate of customs duty to specified goods, provided that certain conditions are met. For instance, section 269C stipulates that a TCO application will meet the core criteria if, on the day the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. This core criterion is defined further in sections 269D, 269E, and 269F, which explain the terms "goods produced in Australia," "ordinary course of business," and "substitutable goods," respectively. If the CEO determines that a TCO application meets these criteria, they must issue a written order, a TCO, declaring the specified goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 applies (subsection 269P(3)).
Entities or individuals seeking a TCO must comply with the application process outlined in the Act. Hydro Aluminium Kurri Kurri Pty Ltd, for example, applied for a TCO for certain aluminum chlorine fluxing injectors on 29 December 2005. The CEO accepted the application and subsequently issued TCO No. 0601576 on 24 March 2006, declaring that these injectors were subject to item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff, with a duty rate of free instead of the general rate of 5%. The CEO is also required to publish a notice in the Gazette, inviting any interested party to submit objections if they believe the TCO should not be granted (subsection 269K(1)). However, no submissions were received in response to the notice for this particular TCO.
The Act outlines the obligations of the CEO and applicants in the context of TCOs. The CEO must assess the application against the core criteria and decide whether to issue a TCO. Additionally, the CEO is obligated to publish a notice in the Gazette to invite submissions from interested parties (subsection 269K(1)). The applicant, such as Hydro Aluminium Kurri Kurri Pty Ltd, must provide sufficient information to meet the core criteria. Once a TCO is granted, the applicant can benefit from the reduced duty rate on the specified goods, potentially applying for a refund of duty on goods imported since the TCO was deemed to have come into force (paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations). The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person other than the Commonwealth (subsection 269S(1)).
In terms of penalties and consequences, the Act does not explicitly state penalties for non-compliance with the TCO provisions. However, the Act generally provides for various offences and penalties related to breaches of customs regulations, which could be applicable if a party attempts to circumvent the TCO process or falsely claims eligibility. These penalties can include fines and imprisonment, as outlined in other sections of the Customs Act and related legislation. For specific details on penalties, one would need to refer to the broader customs legislation and administrative guidelines.