EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0601564
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Orica Australia Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain zinc sulphates on 29 December 2005.
Instrument
TCO No 0601564 was made on 24 March 2006. It declares that those certain zinc sulphates are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0601564 is taken to have come into force on 29 December 2005.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was enacted to regulate the importation and exportation of goods, among other things, in Australia. In 2006, the Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0601564 was introduced to address the gap in the tariff concession scheme under the Customs Act, aiming to provide tariff concessions on certain goods. The instrument was made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) following a valid application by Orica Australia Ltd for tariff concessions on certain zinc sulphates, where it was determined that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia at the time of application. The instrument declared these zinc sulphates as goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 applies, thus granting a tariff concession. The instrument was effective from 29 December 2005, the date of the application, and did not impose any liabilities on any person.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0601564 under the Customs Act 1901 applies to goods specified in the Instrument, which in this case are certain zinc sulphates. This Instrument is created to facilitate tariff concessions for goods that are not produced in Australia and for which there are no substitutable goods available in the Australian market. The application process is overseen by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO), who assesses whether the application meets the core criteria as outlined in the Act, particularly focusing on the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia. This Instrument has national jurisdictional reach as it is an instrument under the Commonwealth's Customs Act 1901. The Instrument is effective from the date the application was lodged, in this case, 29 December 2005. Importantly, it does not disadvantage any person by affecting their rights as at the date of registration, nor does it impose any liabilities on any person other than the Commonwealth. The CEO is required to publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any person who might have objections to the concession, though in this instance, no such submissions were received.
Key Provisions
The primary sections of this legislation (section 269F, 269C, and 269P(3)) outline the process for applying for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) and the conditions under which such an order can be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (section 269P(3)). To qualify for a TCO, an applicant must ensure that the goods in question are not specified in section 269SJ, which lists goods that cannot be subject to a TCO. The application must also meet the core criteria, specifically that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged (section 269C). If these criteria are met, the CEO must make a written TCO order (section 269P(3)).
The legislation imposes specific obligations on both applicants and the CEO. Applicants must ensure their goods are eligible under the terms of the Act and provide evidence that the core criteria are satisfied. The CEO, on the other hand, has the responsibility to review applications, verify that the core criteria are met, and make a written TCO if appropriate. Additionally, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any person who believes the TCO should not be made (section 269K(1)).
Failure to comply with the provisions of this Act can lead to various consequences. Although specific offences and penalties are not detailed in this explanatory statement, breaches of customs regulations generally can result in substantial penalties. Under the Customs Act 1901, offences can attract both civil and criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment. For instance, knowingly making a false statement in an application for a TCO could be considered a civil penalty offence, while more serious breaches might be prosecuted as criminal offences, potentially leading to significant fines and imprisonment terms.
In this particular case, Orica Australia Ltd successfully applied for a TCO for certain zinc sulphates, resulting in the CEO issuing TCO No. 0601564. This order specifies that these zinc sulphates are subject to item 50 of Schedule 4 of the Customs Tariff Act 1995, thereby exempting them from the general 5% duty rate. Importantly, the TCO does not retroactively affect the rights of any person, ensuring that no one other than the Commonwealth is disadvantaged or subjected to liabilities for actions taken before the TCO was registered. Importers of these goods, however, benefit from the ability to apply for a refund of duty paid on imports since the effective date of the TCO.