EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0513213
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Puzey Products Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain human powered hydrofoils on 29 September 2005.
Instrument
TCO No 0513213 was made on 23 December 2005. It declares that those certain human powered hydrofoils are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0513213 is taken to have come into force on 29 September 2005.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to regulate the customs and excise duties, as well as to provide a framework for the administration of these duties. Among its various provisions, Part XVA introduces the concept of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), which allows the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to reduce or eliminate customs duty on certain imported goods under specific conditions. This legislative tool was designed to address the problem of ensuring that Australian industries do not face unnecessary competitive disadvantages due to the high costs of importing raw materials or components that are not produced domestically. The explanatory statement for Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0513213, made under the Customs Act, outlines the process and conditions for making such orders, with the underlying policy objective being to support Australian industries by making certain imported goods more affordable, thereby encouraging local manufacturing and production.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, under Part XVA, establishes a framework for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO), enabling reduced customs duty rates on certain goods. The Act applies to any person or entity that may apply for a TCO for goods, provided those goods are not specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which outlines the goods ineligible for a TCO. The application process requires the CEO to assess whether the goods are substitutable by products manufactured in Australia, in line with the definitions provided in sections 269D and 269E of the Act. If no substitutable goods are produced in Australia, a TCO is issued, as was the case with Puzey Products Pty Ltd's application for certain human-powered hydrofoils, which resulted in Instrument TCO No. 0513213. The geographic scope of this legislation is national, impacting all importers and exporters within Australia. The Act does not disadvantage existing rights of non-Commonwealth persons, and no new liabilities are imposed as a result of a TCO. Furthermore, the CEO must publish notices in the Gazette inviting submissions on proposed TCOs, although no submissions were received for TCO No. 0513213. The TCO itself comes into effect on the date the application is lodged, thus the benefits and reduced duty rates apply retroactively from that date, potentially entitling importers to refunds for duties paid on those goods prior to the TCO's effective date.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901, under Part XVA, establishes a framework where the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) can issue Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). These orders allow for lower rates of customs duty on specified goods. Section 269F of the Act allows any person to apply for a TCO in relation to specific goods. If the CEO is convinced that the application does not pertain to goods listed in section 269SJ, which includes goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, they must determine whether the application meets the core criteria as outlined in section 269C. This section stipulates that an application meets these criteria if, on the date the application is submitted, no substitutable goods are being produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
The obligations under the Customs Act require the CEO to carefully assess each TCO application. This involves ensuring that the application does not cover goods specified in section 269SJ and that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. If these conditions are met, the CEO must proceed to issue a written TCO, as per section 269P(3). This TCO specifies the particular item from Schedule 4 of the Customs Tariff Act 1995 that applies to the goods in question. For example, in the case of Puzey Products Pty Ltd, a TCO was issued for certain human-powered hydrofoils, which were declared to be subject to a duty-free rate under item 50 of Schedule 4.
When issuing a TCO, the CEO must also follow certain procedural requirements. According to subsection 269K(1), the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette inviting any interested parties to lodge submissions if they believe the TCO should not be made. This ensures transparency and provides an opportunity for any objections to be heard. In the case of TCO No. 0513213, no submissions were received in response to the notice. The TCO is deemed to have come into force on the date the application was lodged, as stated in subsection 269S(1). This means that the benefits of the TCO apply retroactively from the date of application, although it does not affect any existing rights or liabilities incurred prior to the registration date.
For any breach of the provisions under the Customs Act 1901, various penalties and consequences may apply. While the explanatory statement does not detail specific penalties, the Act generally provides for both civil and criminal sanctions for non-compliance. Civil penalties can include fines and other monetary penalties, while criminal penalties can involve imprisonment or both fines and imprisonment, depending on the severity of the offence. The maximum penalties would be determined by the specific nature of the breach and would be subject to the relevant sections of the Act and any associated regulations.