Tariff Concession Order 0512939

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2006L00005 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0512939

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

Sun Metals Corporation applied for a TCO in respect of certain Cooling Towers on 27 September 2005.

Instrument

TCO No 0512939 was made on 3 January 2006.  It declares that those certain Cooling Towers are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is 0%.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 0512939 is taken to have come into force on 27 September 2005.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, introduces a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO). This legislative framework addresses the problem of ensuring that Australian industries can access imported goods at reduced customs duty rates, provided that such goods are not produced in Australia and there are no substitutable goods. The policy objective is to foster economic efficiency and competitiveness by allowing the importation of certain goods at a lower rate of duty, which in turn benefits importers and end-users by potentially reducing the cost of these goods. The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0512939, made on 3 January 2006, exemplifies this scheme by granting a TCO to Sun Metals Corporation for certain Cooling Towers, reducing their duty rate from 5% to 0%, effective from 27 September 2005. This concession was granted after the CEO determined that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia, thereby meeting the core criteria specified in the Act.

Scope and Application

The Customs Act 1901, through Part XVA, provides a framework for the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, aimed at granting preferential rates of customs duty on specified goods. This mechanism applies to any person who lodges an application for a TCO in relation to goods that meet the criteria outlined in the Act, such as when no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. The scope of the Act is federal, applying across the Commonwealth of Australia and impacting all entities and individuals involved in the importation of goods that are subject to a TCO. The application process is triggered by a written submission to the CEO, who must then determine whether the application meets the core criteria set forth in the Act, particularly the absence of substitutable domestic production. Any person can object to the granting of a TCO, but in the case of TCO No. 0512939, no objections were received. The commencement date of a TCO is the day on which the application was lodged, ensuring that the preferential duty rates apply retroactively from the application date. The TCO does not affect the rights of any person as at the date of registration in a manner that would disadvantage them or impose new liabilities, although it does provide for the potential refund of duties paid on goods imported since the effective date of the concession.

Key Provisions

The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0512939, made under section 269F of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act), applies to goods for which Sun Metals Corporation applied on 27 September 2005. The instrument, which came into force on the same date, declares that certain Cooling Towers are subject to a 0% duty rate under item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) (sections 269P(3) and 269S(1)). These Cooling Towers would otherwise have been subject to a general duty rate of 5%. The Act mandates that an application for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO) must be made to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) and that the CEO must consider the application against the core criteria set out in section 269C. Specifically, if no substitutable goods were produced in Australia on the day the application was lodged, and if the goods are not specified in section 269SJ, the CEO must make a TCO (section 269F). In this case, the CEO was satisfied that the application met these criteria and hence issued TCO No. 0512939 on 3 January 2006. The CEO must also publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any person who believes the TCO should not be made, although no submissions were received in this instance (subsection 269K(1)). The Act imposes several obligations on the CEO in processing a TCO application. The CEO must assess whether the application meets the core criteria and, if satisfied, make a TCO. Additionally, the CEO is required to consider any submissions received in response to the Gazette notice. Once the TCO is made, it cannot affect the rights of any person (other than the Commonwealth) as they stood before the date of registration, and it does not impose any new liabilities on any person (section 269S). Importers of the goods affected by the TCO may apply for a refund of duty paid on those goods since the date the TCO is taken to have come into force (subsection 126(1)(r) of the Regulations). Failure to comply with the requirements of the Act can result in civil or criminal consequences. While the explanatory statement does not specify any particular offences under the Act, breaches of other provisions within the Customs Act 1901 may incur penalties. For instance, knowingly or recklessly making a false statement or representation in connection with the importation or exportation of goods can result in a penalty of up to 10,000 penalty units or imprisonment for up to five years, or both, under section 229A. The exact penalties for breaches specifically related to TCOs would need to be determined by reference to the broader Customs Act 1901.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Definitions & Interpretation
Licensing & Registration

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.