EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0512196
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Arkema Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain acrylic esters and maleic anhydride terpolymers of ethylene on 16 September 2005.
Instrument
TCO No 0512196 was made on 25 November 2005. It declares that those certain acrylic esters and maleic anhydride terpolymers are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is free.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0512196 is taken to have come into force on 16 September 2005.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Australian Parliament, facilitates the imposition of lower rates of customs duty on certain goods through Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). Specifically, the Act establishes a framework under which the Chief Executive Officer of Customs can make these orders, allowing for tariff concessions when certain conditions are met. This legislative instrument was introduced to address the need for a streamlined process to reduce customs duties on goods where domestic production alternatives are not readily available. The policy objective behind the Act is to promote trade efficiency and support industry competitiveness by ensuring that imported goods can be brought into Australia at reduced duty rates where no suitable domestic substitutes exist, thereby encouraging economic growth and consumer benefits.
In this context, Arkema Pty Ltd successfully applied for a tariff concession on specific acrylic esters and maleic anhydride terpolymers, leading to Instrument No. 0512196. This instrument declares that these particular goods are subject to a zero-duty rate, effective from the date of the application, 16 September 2005. The process involved consultation with the public, although no objections were received. This instrument exemplifies the Act's intent to facilitate smoother trade operations by reducing duty burdens on essential imports, ultimately benefiting both businesses and consumers in the Australian market.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, through Part XVA, facilitates the creation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, providing reduced customs duty rates for specified goods. An application for a TCO can be made by any person, provided the goods do not fall under the exclusions listed in section 269SJ of the Act. The core criteria for approval, as outlined in section 269C, necessitate that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia on the date of application, as defined by sections 269D and 269E. This legislation applies nationally across Australia, with the scope of its benefits extending to importers who can claim duty refunds for goods imported since the effective date of the TCO. The application process requires public notification and consultation, as mandated by section 269K(1), although no submissions were received in this instance. The TCO in question, No. 0512196, was made in relation to certain acrylic esters and maleic anhydride terpolymers of ethylene, with the concession effective from the date of application, 16 September 2005, and does not retroactively disadvantage or impose liabilities on any person.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0512196 under the Customs Act 1901 (section 269P(3)) are concerned with the process of applying for and making a Tariff Concession Order (TCO). When an application for a TCO is made under section 269F, the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) must decide whether the application meets the core criteria set out in section 269C. This requires that on the day the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets these criteria, they must make a written order declaring that the goods in question are subject to a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995, which specifies the duty rates.
The obligations imposed by this legislation on the parties involved include the requirement for the CEO to consider each TCO application carefully to ensure that it meets the core criteria. The CEO must also publish a notice in the Gazette as soon as practicable after accepting an application as valid, inviting any interested parties to submit objections or reasons why the TCO should not be made (section 269K(1)). Additionally, the CEO must ensure that any TCO does not affect the rights of any person as at the date of registration, except for the Commonwealth, to the detriment of that person or to impose liabilities in respect of anything done or omitted before the date of registration (subsection 269S(1)).
The instrument itself imposes specific obligations on the importer of the goods covered by the TCO. Importers are entitled to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day the TCO is taken to have come into force (paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations). This obligation is designed to ensure that importers benefit from the tariff concession without delay.
Any breaches of the conditions under which the TCO is granted may lead to penalties. The Act does not specify particular civil or criminal penalties for failing to comply with the TCO provisions, but general provisions under the Customs Act 1901 may apply. These include fines and potential criminal charges for fraudulent behaviour or misrepresentation. The exact penalties would depend on the specific nature of the breach and could range from fines up to thousands of dollars to imprisonment, depending on the severity and intent of the breach.