EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0510588
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Australian Pacific Paper Products applied for a TCO in respect of certain Polyethylene Film on 11 August 2005.
Instrument
TCO No 0510588 was made on 21 October 2005. It declares that those certain Polyethylene Film are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is 0%.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0510588 is taken to have come into force on 11 August 2005.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0510588 was enacted in 2005 under the Customs Act 1901, to facilitate the granting of tariff concessions on specific goods, thereby addressing the need for streamlined processes in the application and evaluation of such concessions. This legislation was introduced by the Australian Government, specifically through the Chief Executive Officer of Customs, to ensure that the application process for tariff concessions is transparent and efficient. The policy objective behind this legislation is to provide a mechanism whereby the CEO can effectively manage tariff concessions, ensuring that they are only granted when appropriate, thereby balancing the need to support Australian industries with the broader economic objectives of the country.
The instrument, TCO No. 0510588, was made on 21 October 2005, in response to an application by Australian Pacific Paper Products for certain Polyethylene Film. The CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia, leading to the concession of a 0% duty rate on these goods, down from the general rate of 5%. This concession came into effect on 11 August 2005, the date the application was lodged, and does not affect any pre-existing rights or impose new liabilities on any party. Importers of these goods are eligible to apply for a refund of duty from the effective date of the concession.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901, through its Part XVA, provides the framework for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) which may be issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO). These orders apply to specific goods for which an application has been made, and they offer a concession in the form of a lower rate of customs duty than the standard rate set out in the Customs Tariff Act 1995. An application for a TCO can be made by any person, but it must meet the core criteria established under section 269C of the Act, which requires that on the date of application, no substitutable goods are being produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Excluded from TCO consideration are goods specified under section 269SJ of the Act. Once an application is accepted as valid, a TCO can be issued, and it comes into force on the date of the application’s lodgement, as per subsection 269S(1) of the Act. The CEO must also publish a notice in the Gazette, inviting submissions from any interested parties, although no submissions were received for this particular TCO. The geographic and jurisdictional reach of this legislation is national, as it pertains to the importation of goods into Australia and the application of customs duties under Commonwealth law.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Customs Act 1901, specifically in relation to Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs), are sections 269C, 269F, 269P, and 269SJ. Section 269F permits an application for a TCO to be made to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO), while section 269C specifies the core criteria that must be met for such an application to be accepted. This includes the requirement that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia on the day the application was lodged (section 269C). If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets these criteria, they must make a written order (section 269P(3)). Section 269SJ lists the goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, ensuring that certain critical goods remain subject to standard tariff rates.
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. The CEO is required to assess each TCO application against the core criteria, particularly focusing on whether substitutable goods were produced in Australia on the day of the application (section 269C). Additionally, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any person who believes there are reasons why the TCO should not be made (subsection 269K(1)). The CEO must consider any submissions received before making a final decision. Australian Pacific Paper Products, as the applicant, must ensure that their application is valid and meets all the specified criteria.
Breaches of the requirements under this Act can lead to various consequences. For instance, if an application for a TCO is found to be invalid, or if a TCO is improperly granted, there could be civil or administrative penalties. The exact nature and extent of penalties are not specified in the Act but would typically involve fines or other financial penalties. Additionally, the Act ensures that the rights of persons other than the Commonwealth are not adversely affected by the TCO. This means that any person who has already imported goods before the TCO was registered cannot be disadvantaged by the tariff concession.
There are no criminal offences explicitly outlined in the explanatory statement, but civil penalties could include financial penalties for non-compliance or improper application. The Act ensures that the rights of importers are protected, particularly regarding the ability to apply for refunds of duty on goods imported since the TCO was taken to have come into force (paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations). The Act also explicitly states that the TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person, ensuring that the regulatory environment remains fair and balanced.