Tariff Concession Order 0509806

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2005L03066 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0509806

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

Pharmapac Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain Aluminium Containers on 25 July 2005.

Instrument

TCO No 0509806 was made on 30 September 2005.  It declares that those certain Aluminium Containers are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%.  The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is 0%.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO.  The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged.  TCO No. 0509806 is taken to have come into force on 25 July 2005.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

Overview

The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0509806 was enacted in 2005 under the Customs Act 1901, to address the need for tariff concessions for specific imported goods where no substitutable goods are produced in Australia. The Act allows for the application of reduced customs duty rates on certain imported goods through the issuance of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. This legislative instrument was introduced to facilitate more competitive pricing and market access for imported goods that do not have Australian-made alternatives, thus supporting trade and economic objectives. The instrument was enacted by the Parliament of Australia with the policy objective of enhancing trade efficiency and consumer benefits by lowering the duty on specified imported goods, in this case, certain Aluminium Containers, from the standard 5% to 0%. Pharmapac Pty Ltd successfully applied for a TCO for certain Aluminium Containers, which was granted on 30 September 2005, effective from the date of the application on 25 July 2005. The CEO of Customs was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia, thus meeting the core criteria for a TCO. The process involved a public consultation period where no objections were raised, leading to the issuance of the concession. This TCO benefits importers by potentially allowing them to claim refunds on duties paid on these goods since the effective date of the concession, while ensuring that no existing rights or liabilities are adversely affected.

Scope and Application

The Customs Act 1901 applies to any individual or entity seeking to import goods into Australia, particularly those seeking tariff concession orders (TCO) for specific goods. The Act allows for the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to make a TCO that lowers the customs duty rate on certain goods if certain conditions are met. The Act applies on a national level and extends to all states and territories of Australia. A TCO can only be made if the goods in question are not specified in section 269SJ of the Act, and if no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. The application for a TCO must meet the core criteria outlined in section 269C of the Act. Any subordinate instruments made under this Act would need to be consistent with its provisions and objectives. The explanatory statement does not mention any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds that would limit the application of this Act.

Key Provisions

The primary operative sections of this legislation (sections 269C, 269B, 269F, 269SJ, and 269P(3) of the Customs Act 1901) establish a framework for the application and consideration of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs). An applicant can apply to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs for a TCO if the goods in question are not specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which outlines the goods that cannot be subject to a TCO. The CEO is mandated to consider the application if it meets the core criteria set out in section 269C, which includes a condition that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business on the day the application was lodged. If the CEO determines that the application meets these criteria, they must make a written order, a TCO, declaring that the goods in question are subject to a specific rate of duty as outlined in the Customs Tariff Act 1995. In this case, Instrument TCO No. 0509806 declared that certain Aluminium Containers were subject to a duty rate of 0%. The Customs Act 1901 imposes certain obligations on the CEO and the applicants for a TCO. The CEO must assess whether an application meets the core criteria and, if so, make a written order as a TCO. The CEO must also publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any person who believes there are reasons why the TCO should not be made. In this instance, no submissions were received. Additionally, the Act stipulates that the TCO does not affect the rights of any person other than the Commonwealth and does not impose any liabilities on a person in respect of anything done or omitted before the date of registration. Failure to comply with the provisions of the Customs Act 1901, particularly in relation to the making and enforcement of TCOs, may result in civil or criminal consequences. While the explanatory statement does not detail specific offences or penalties, breaches of the Act can generally lead to penalties under the various sections of the Act and the Regulations, which can include fines and imprisonment. The precise penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, as well as any relevant case law. For instance, incorrect or fraudulent applications for a TCO could be prosecuted under the relevant sections of the Customs Act 1901, leading to significant penalties.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Tariff Concession Order
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.