EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No 0502850
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made and revoked by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under sections 269C and 269P of the Act, a TCO will be made if the application for the TCO meets the core criteria, that is, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.
Subsection 269SD(2) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that, in making a TCO, there has been a transcription error in the description of goods the subject of the TCO including the tariff classification that is stated in the TCO to apply to the goods, the CEO may:
− make an order revoking the TCO; and
− make a new TCO in respect of goods that corrects the error.
Instrument
Tariff Concessions Instrument No 0502850 was made on 8 March 2005. It revokes TCO No 0413700 and makes TCO No 0502850 because of a transcription error.
Consultation
No consultation was undertaken since the change is minor or machinery nature and does not substantially alter existing arrangements.
Commencement
Subsection 269SD(3) provides that the order revoking the TCO has effect from the day on which the TCO came into force and the new TCO has effect from the revocation of the old TCO.
Subsection 269SD(6) provides that section 269SD has effect despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Section 12 prohibits the making of certain retrospective legislative instruments.
Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0502850 revoked 0413700 and made new TCO 0502850 on 8 March 2005.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901, as amended, includes provisions for Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) under Part XVA. This instrument, F2005L00663, was enacted in 2005 and is designed to address transcription errors in previously issued TCOs. The instrument was enacted by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs and aims to correct inaccuracies in the description of goods and their tariff classifications, ensuring the application of appropriate customs duty rates. This specific instrument, made on 8 March 2005, revokes TCO No 0413700 and replaces it with TCO No 0502850, reflecting the necessary corrections. The changes are procedural and of a minor nature, thus no consultation was deemed necessary, and the new order took effect from the date of revocation of the previous TCO.
Scope and Application
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0502850, made under the Customs Act 1901, specifically addresses the correction of a transcription error in a previously issued Tariff Concession Order (TCO). This instrument applies to any goods that were subject to the now-revoked TCO No. 0413700 and the newly established TCO No. 0502850. The Act allows the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to make and revoke TCOs, which apply a lower rate of customs duty to certain goods, provided that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia at the time the application is lodged. The instrument applies nationally and affects all entities and individuals involved in the importation of the specified goods. It ensures that the error in the original TCO is rectified, maintaining the integrity of the tariff concession scheme. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions in this particular instrument, and it does not extend or restrict application through subordinate instruments beyond its specific purpose of correcting the identified error.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0502850, made under the Customs Act 1901, are sections 269C, 269P, and 269SD. These sections provide the framework for the making and revocation of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO). Specifically, section 269C sets out the core criteria for making a TCO, which is that, on the day the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269P deals with the process of making a TCO, while section 269SD(2) allows the CEO to correct any transcription errors in a TCO by revoking the existing order and issuing a new one.
The Tariff Concession Instrument imposes specific obligations on the CEO of Customs. It requires the CEO to review any application for a TCO against the core criteria in section 269C to ensure that the application meets the necessary conditions. If an application is made, and the CEO determines that a TCO should be issued, the CEO must follow the procedure outlined in section 269P. Furthermore, under section 269SD(2), if a transcription error is identified in a TCO, the CEO must promptly revoke the erroneous TCO and issue a corrected one. The CEO must ensure that these actions are taken without unnecessary delay to maintain the integrity of the tariff concession scheme.
In terms of penalties and consequences, the Customs Act 1901 does not specify particular offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breaches of the tariff concession provisions. However, any failure by the CEO to comply with the requirements of sections 269C, 269P, and 269SD could potentially lead to legal challenges or administrative consequences. For example, if a TCO is improperly made or not corrected upon identifying a transcription error, it could result in incorrect tariff rates being applied, which might lead to financial losses for importers or exporters. While the Act does not prescribe specific penalties, the consequences of such failures might include judicial review or other administrative remedies to ensure compliance with the legislative requirements.
The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0502850 came into effect on 8 March 2005. According to subsection 269SD(3), the revocation of the old TCO (No. 0413700) took effect from the day the original TCO came into force, and the new TCO (No. 0502850) took effect from the moment the old TCO was revoked. This arrangement ensures that there is no gap in the application of tariff concessions due to the correction of the transcription error. Subsection 269SD(6) further clarifies that section 269SD operates despite section 12 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, which generally prohibits retrospective legislative instruments, ensuring that the CEO’s actions under section 269SD are legally valid and effective.