EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Tariff Concession Instrument No.0413052
Customs Act 1901
Background
Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO.
Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods. If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.
Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.
Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.
Oliver Footwear applied for a TCO in respect of certain footwear injection heads on 29 November 2004.
Instrument
TCO No 0413052 was made on 4 February 2005. It declares that those certain footwear injection heads are goods to which item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia. The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is 3%.
Consultation
Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.
Commencement
Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No. 0413052 is taken to have come into force on 29 November 2004.
The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. The rights of importers will be beneficially affected. Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force. The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.
Overview
The Customs Act 1901 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to regulate the administration of customs and excise in Australia. The Act provides for the application of tariffs, including the possibility of tariff concession orders (TCOs) for specific goods, as detailed in Part XVA. This part of the Act enables the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to reduce the rate of customs duty on certain goods, provided they meet specific criteria and are not substitutes for goods produced domestically. Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0413052, made on 4 February 2005, is an example of such a concession, reducing the duty on certain footwear injection heads from 5% to 3%. This measure was introduced to address the need for tariff relief for goods that do not have local substitutes, thereby encouraging import and use of these specific goods within the Australian market. The policy objective is to support industries by making imported goods more competitively priced, thus potentially benefiting consumers and businesses alike.
Scope and Application
The Customs Act 1901 provides a mechanism for granting tariff concessions on certain goods, allowing for lower rates of customs duty to be applied. This process is governed by Part XVA of the Act, which empowers the Chief Executive Officer of Customs to make Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) in respect of goods. The application for a TCO must meet specific core criteria, including the absence of substitutable goods produced in Australia at the time of application. Once the CEO determines that these criteria are satisfied, a TCO can be issued, effectively reducing the customs duty on the specified goods. The Act ensures that such concessions do not disadvantage any person by protecting their rights as at the date of registration, and it allows importers to apply for duty refunds on goods imported since the effective date of the TCO. The geographic reach of this legislation is national, as it operates under the framework of the Customs Act 1901, which is a Commonwealth Act. The application of this Act is not restricted by state or territory boundaries, ensuring uniform application across Australia. The Act does not specify any exclusions or exemptions to the TCO process beyond those goods listed in section 269SJ of the Act, which inherently cannot be subject to a TCO. Any further application or interpretation of the Act may be extended or clarified through subordinate instruments as necessary.
Key Provisions
The primary operative sections of the Customs Act 1901 that pertain to Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) include section 269F (subsections 269C, 269P(3) and 269K(1)), which outline the process for applying for and making a TCO. Section 269F allows a person to apply to the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) for a TCO in respect of certain goods, with the understanding that a lower rate of customs duty applies to these goods if the application is approved. The CEO must then decide whether the application meets the core criteria, which are specified in section 269C of the Act. If the CEO is satisfied that the application meets these criteria, they are required to make a written order (a TCO) declaring the goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 applies.
The Act imposes certain obligations and requirements on the parties or entities it governs. For instance, section 269K(1) requires the CEO to publish a notice in the Gazette inviting submissions from any person who believes there are reasons why the TCO should not be made. This section ensures that there is a level of transparency and opportunity for interested parties to voice their opinions on the application. Additionally, the CEO must ensure that any TCO made does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration. This is detailed in subsection 269S(1) of the Act.
There are potential civil and criminal consequences for breaches of the Customs Act 1901, although specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the provided text. Generally, under Australian law, breaches of customs regulations can result in fines and, in severe cases, criminal prosecution. The exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, and would be determined by the relevant courts. However, the Act does not specify maximum penalties for breaches related to TCOs within the provided excerpt. The consequences for non-compliance could include financial penalties, legal action, or both, depending on the specific circumstances of the breach.