Tariff Concession Order 0411196

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2005L00030 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0411196

Customs Act 1901

Background

Part XVA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) sets out a scheme under which Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) may be made by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO).  A lower rate of customs duty applies to goods that are the subject of a TCO. 

Under section 269F of the Act, a person may apply to the CEO for a TCO in respect of goods.  If the CEO is satisfied that the application is not in respect of goods specified in section 269SJ of the Act, which sets out those goods that cannot be subject to a TCO, the CEO must decide whether the application meets the core criteria.

Section 269C of the Act provides that a TCO application meets the core criteria if, on the day on which the application was lodged, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business.  Section 269B of the Act provides that ‘goods produced in Australia’ has the meaning given by section 269D, ‘ordinary course of business’ has the meaning given by section 269E and ‘substitutable goods’ in respect of goods the subject of a TCO application, means goods produced in Australia that are put, or are capable of being put, to a use that corresponds with a use (including a design use) to which the goods the subject of the application can be put.

Subsection 269P(3) of the Act provides that if the CEO is satisfied that a TCO application meets the core criteria, the CEO must make a written order (a TCO) declaring that the goods the subject of the TCO application are goods to which a prescribed item of Schedule 4 to the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff) specified in the order applies.

Watersave Australia Pty Ltd applied for a TCO in respect of certain water free urinals on 28 October 2004.

Instrument

TCO No 0411196 was made on 4 January 2005.  It declares that those certain water free urinals are goods to which item 50A of Schedule 4 to the Tariff applies since the CEO was satisfied that no substitutable goods were produced in Australia.  The general rate of duty on these goods is 5%. The rate of duty for the goods subject to the TCO is 0%.

Consultation

Subsection 269K(1) of the Act provides in part that as soon as practicable after accepting a TCO application as a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette which includes an invitation to any person who considers that there are reasons why the TCO should not be made to lodge a submission with the CEO. The CEO did not receive any submissions in response to this invitation.

Commencement

Subsection 269S(1) relevantly provides that a TCO is to be taken to have come into force on the day on which the application for the TCO was lodged. TCO No.0411196 is taken to have come into force on 28 October 2004.

The TCO does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth) as at the date of registration so as to disadvantage that person or impose liabilities on a person (other than the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of registration.  The rights of importers will be beneficially affected.  Under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations, importers of such goods will be able to apply for a refund of duty on goods imported since the day on which the TCO is taken to have come into force.  The TCO does not impose any liabilities on any person.

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, provides a framework for the administration of customs duties, including a mechanism for tariff concession orders (TCO) to provide relief from customs duties on certain imported goods. The Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0411196, published on 4 January 2005, applies a zero per cent duty rate to certain water-free urinals, reducing the general duty rate of five per cent, in response to an application by Watersave Australia Pty Ltd. The instrument was introduced to address the issue of imported goods that have no Australian-made equivalents, thereby ensuring competitive pricing and availability in the domestic market. The CEO of Customs was satisfied that the application met the core criteria, which require that no substitutable goods are produced in Australia, and no objections were raised during the consultation period. The TCO is effective as of the date the application was lodged, 28 October 2004, and does not affect the rights of importers or impose any new liabilities.

Scope and Application

The Customs Act 1901, specifically Part XVA, facilitates the application of tariff concessions for certain goods through Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. These orders apply to goods for which no substitutable goods are produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business, effectively reducing the customs duty on these imported goods. For instance, the Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0411196 pertains to certain water-free urinals, for which a TCO was applied and granted due to the absence of substitutable goods in Australia, thereby reducing the duty rate from 5% to 0%. This legislation is applicable nationwide and is enforced by the CEO of Customs, who is required to make written orders once an application meets the core criteria and no objections are received from interested parties. The rights of importers are positively impacted by such concessions, allowing them to apply for duty refunds on goods imported after the effective date of the TCO, which aligns with the date the application was lodged.

Key Provisions

The main sections of Tariff Concession Instrument No. 0411196 under the Customs Act 1901 (section 269F) pertain to the process and criteria for applying for a Tariff Concession Order (TCO). When an individual or entity applies for a TCO, the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) must first determine if the goods are not specified in section 269SJ, which lists goods ineligible for a TCO. If the application meets this preliminary condition, the CEO must then assess if it meets the core criteria outlined in section 269C. This requires confirmation that, on the date of application, no substitutable goods were produced in Australia in the ordinary course of business. Once these conditions are satisfied, the CEO issues a written TCO, specifying the reduced duty rate applicable to the goods. In the case of Watersave Australia Pty Ltd's application for certain water-free urinals, the CEO issued TCO No. 0411196, setting the duty rate at 0% instead of the general 5%. The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties involved include the requirement for applicants to submit a valid application to the CEO for a TCO. The CEO, in turn, has the duty to assess the application against the criteria set out in sections 269C and 269SJ, and to make a written order if the application meets the core criteria. Additionally, upon accepting a valid application, the CEO must publish a notice in the Gazette, inviting any interested parties to submit submissions opposing the TCO. In this instance, the CEO did not receive any submissions. The Act also mandates that a TCO comes into effect on the date the application is lodged, which in this case was 28 October 2004 for TCO No. 0411196. Section 269S(1) of the Act stipulates that a TCO does not affect the rights of any person, other than the Commonwealth, as at the date of registration in a way that disadvantages that person or imposes liabilities for actions prior to registration. This ensures that while the rights of importers are positively affected, no existing rights or liabilities are prejudiced. Importers of goods subject to a TCO can apply for a refund of duty under paragraph 126(1)(r) of the Regulations for goods imported since the TCO came into effect. The legislation does not impose any liabilities on any person beyond these specified conditions. Under the Customs Act 1901, any breach of the provisions related to TCOs can lead to civil or criminal consequences. However, the specific offences, penalties, or consequences are not detailed in the provided text of the explanatory statement. Generally, under Australian law, breaches of customs regulations can lead to penalties, which may include fines and, in severe cases, imprisonment. The exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, as well as any additional regulations or guidelines established by the relevant authorities.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.