Government House
Canberra ACT 2600
24 August 2018
His Excellency the Governor-General directs it to be notified, for general information, that:
a) he has revoked the appointment of:
- The Honourable Scott Morrison MP as Treasurer.
b) he has made the following appointments:
- The Honourable Scott Morrison MP as Prime Minister
- The Honourable Josh Frydenberg MP as Treasurer.
By His Excellency’s Command
Paul Singer MVO
Acting Official Secretary to the Governor-General
Overview
The document C2018G00673, issued on 24 August 2018, details changes in ministerial appointments within the Australian government. This gazette was issued by His Excellency the Governor-General, acting on behalf of the Parliament, and serves to notify the public of these official changes. The appointments made include the Honourable Scott Morrison MP as Prime Minister and the Honourable Josh Frydenberg MP as Treasurer, reflecting a shift in leadership roles following the revocation of Morrison's previous appointment as Treasurer. This change was made to address the need for a new leadership structure within the government, ensuring that the roles of Prime Minister and Treasurer are filled by individuals capable of steering the nation's economic and political direction effectively.
Scope and Application
The revocation and subsequent appointments outlined in C2018G00673 pertain to specific individuals within the Commonwealth of Australia's federal government. The appointments affect The Honourable Scott Morrison MP, who has been reassigned from the position of Treasurer to that of Prime Minister, and The Honourable Josh Frydenberg MP, who has been appointed to the role of Treasurer. These appointments are made under the authority of His Excellency the Governor-General, indicating that they have nationwide applicability within Australia's federal structure. The Act does not specify any geographic exclusions or exemptions, suggesting that the appointments have full jurisdiction across the Commonwealth. Any further elaboration on the roles and responsibilities associated with these positions would be detailed in subordinate instruments or other legislative provisions, though these are not explicitly outlined in the provided text.
Key Provisions
The primary operative sections of this legislation (C2018G00673) involve the revocation of the appointment of the Honourable Scott Morrison MP as Treasurer (section a) and the subsequent appointments of the Honourable Scott Morrison MP as Prime Minister and the Honourable Josh Frydenberg MP as Treasurer (section b). This means that the former Treasurer, Scott Morrison, is no longer in that role, while Scott Morrison transitions to the position of Prime Minister, and Josh Frydenberg is appointed as the new Treasurer. These changes are effective from the date of the Gazette, 24 August 2018.
The obligations and requirements imposed by this Act are primarily concerned with the formal appointment and transition processes within the Australian government. The Act mandates that the Governor-General, as the formal authority for such appointments, must officially revoke the previous appointment of Scott Morrison as Treasurer and simultaneously make the new appointments. The Governor-General’s directive, as outlined in the Gazette, serves as the legal basis for these changes. There are no additional procedural or formal requirements stipulated within this particular legislative instrument beyond the issuance of the Gazette.
Regarding potential offences, penalties, or consequences for breach, this specific legislative instrument does not detail any penalties or consequences for failing to comply with the appointments outlined. The primary function of this document is declarative and directive, ensuring that the appointments are legally recognised and effective. However, it is important to note that any failure to comply with the formal procedures for appointments as outlined in other relevant legislation could result in legal challenges or other consequences. Under Australian law, the validity of such appointments could be subject to judicial review if there were grounds to question the process or legality of the appointments.