Surplus Revenue Act 1910
Act No. 8 of 1910 as amended
This compilation was prepared on 9 November 2012
taking into account amendments up to Act No. 136 of 2012
The text of any of those amendments not in force
on that date is appended in the Notes section
The operation of amendments that have been incorporated may be
affected by application provisions that are set out in the Notes section
Prepared by the Office of Parliamentary Counsel, Canberra
Contents
1 Short title [see Note 1]
3 Cesser of the Braddon clause of the Constitution
Notes
An Act relating to the Financial Relations between the Commonwealth and the several States
1 Short title [see Note 1]
(1) This Act may be cited as the Surplus Revenue Act 1910.
(2) The Surplus Revenue Act 1908, as amended by this Act, may be cited as the Surplus Revenue Act 1908‑1910.
3 Cesser of the Braddon clause of the Constitution
From and after the thirty‑first day of December One thousand nine hundred and ten, section eighty‑seven of the Constitution shall cease to have effect, so far as it affects the power of the Commonwealth to apply any portion of the net revenue of Customs and Excise towards its expenditure, and so far as it affects the payment of any balance by the Commonwealth to the several States, or the application of such balance towards the payment of interest on the debts of the several States taken over by the Commonwealth.
Notes to the Surplus Revenue Act 1910
Note 1
The Surplus Revenue Act 1910 as shown in this compilation comprises Act No. 8, 1910 amended as indicated in the Tables below.
Table of Acts
Act | Number and year | Date of Assent | Date of commencement | Application, saving or transitional provisions |
Surplus Revenue Act 1910 | 8, 1910 | 2 Sept 1910 | 2 Sept 1910 | |
States Grants Act 1927 | 4, 1927 | 8 Apr 1927 | 8 Apr 1927 | S. 2 |
Statute Law Revision Act 1934 | 45, 1934 | 6 Aug 1934 | 6 Aug 1934 | — |
Statute Law Revision Act 1973 | 216, 1973 | 19 Dec 1973 | 31 Dec 1973 | Ss. 9 (1) and 10 |
Statute Law Revision Act 2012 | 136, 2012 | 22 Sept 2012 | Schedule 6 (item 75): Royal Assent | — |
Table of Amendments
ad. = added or inserted am. = amended rep. = repealed rs. = repealed and substituted |
Provision affected | How affected |
S. 1.................... | am. No. 216, 1973 |
S. 2.................... | rep. No. 136, 2012 |
Ss. 4–7................. | rep. No. 4, 1927 |
Schedule................ | rep. No. 45 1934 |
Overview
The Surplus Revenue Act 1910 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address the financial relationship between the Commonwealth and the states as stipulated in section eighty-seven of the Constitution, often referred to as the Braddon clause. This clause imposed restrictions on the Commonwealth's ability to apply its net revenue from Customs and Excise towards its expenditure and required the Commonwealth to distribute any surplus revenue to the states. The Act aims to cease the operation of the Braddon clause from 31 December 1910, thereby giving the Commonwealth greater flexibility in managing its finances without the obligation to redistribute surplus revenue to the states. This legislative change was part of a broader policy objective to streamline the financial arrangements between the federal government and the states, enhancing the Commonwealth's fiscal autonomy.
Scope and Application
The Surplus Revenue Act 1910, as amended, pertains to the financial relations between the Commonwealth of Australia and the several States. It primarily serves to cease the effect of the Braddon clause of the Constitution, which had previously restricted the Commonwealth's ability to use net revenue from Customs and Excise for its expenditures and to make payments to the States. The Act applies to the Commonwealth government and the States, altering the financial dynamics established by the Constitution by removing the specified restrictions on the use of customs and excise revenue, effective from 31 December 1910. This legislative change allows the Commonwealth greater flexibility in the allocation of its financial resources, thereby impacting the fiscal relationship and the distribution of revenue among the various levels of government in Australia. The Act has been amended over time, with certain sections being repealed or altered by subsequent legislation, but its core purpose remains consistent with the original intent to modify constitutional financial provisions.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Surplus Revenue Act 1910 (C1910A00008) primarily concern the cessation of the Braddon clause of the Constitution. Section 3 of the Act specifies that from and after 31 December 1910, section 87 of the Constitution would cease to affect the Commonwealth's power to apply any portion of the net revenue from Customs and Excise towards its expenditure. This also includes the cessation of the payment of any balance by the Commonwealth to the several States, or the application of such balance towards the payment of interest on the debts of the several States taken over by the Commonwealth.
The Act imposes specific obligations on the Commonwealth and the several States by altering the financial relations as stipulated in the Constitution. It mandates that the Commonwealth no longer be obligated to pay any balance to the States or to apply such balances towards the interest on debts taken over from the States. This change directly impacts the financial obligations and entitlements previously outlined in section 87 of the Constitution.
In terms of consequences, there are no explicit offences or penalties detailed within the text of the Surplus Revenue Act 1910 for non-compliance with its provisions. The Act, however, is a legislative instrument that alters the constitutional framework and financial relations between the Commonwealth and the States. Any breach of the financial obligations as redefined by the Act could lead to legal challenges or disputes, potentially resulting in court interpretations and decisions on the implications of the Act's provisions. It is important to note that the absence of specific penalties within the text does not imply a lack of legal consequences for non-compliance with the altered financial arrangements.