Superannuation (prudential standard) determination No. 5 of 2012 - Prudential Standard SPS 250 - Insurance in Superannuation

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au F2012L02225 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Superannuation (prudential standard) determination No. 5 of 2012

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Prepared by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA)

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993, section 34C(1)

 

Under subsection 34C(1) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (the Act), APRA has the power to determine standards (prudential standards), in writing, in relation to prudential matters to be complied with by all RSE licensees of registrable superannuation entities (RSEs).

On 15 November 2012, APRA made Superannuation (prudential standard) determination No. 5 of 2012 under subsection 34C(1) of the Act (the instrument).

The instrument commences upon registration on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.[1]

  1. Background

The Government indicated, in its response to the recommendations of the Super System Review in December 2010, support for the recommendation that APRA be given the power to make prudential standards in respect of superannuation, consistent with APRA’s existing powers in respect of banking and insurance.[2]

In April 2012, APRA released 11 draft prudential standards to implement APRA’s proposed prudential framework for superannuation, incorporating those elements of the Government’s superannuation reforms that come within APRA’s mandate. APRA’s proposals covered prudential requirements common to other APRA-regulated industries as well as superannuation-specific requirements. The proposals also included relocating some current requirements in the Act and Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994 and non-binding guidance material into the new prudential standards, and harmonising the requirements for superannuation with those applying to other APRA-regulated industries to the extent practical. 

APRA was granted the ability to make prudential standards in relation to superannuation under the Act by the passage of the Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Trustee Obligations and Prudential Standards) Act 2012 on 8 September 2012.

2.             Purpose and operation of the instrument

The purpose of the instrument is to make Prudential Standard SPS 250 Insurance in Superannuation (SPS 250), which sets out prudential requirements for an RSE licensee with respect to making available insured benefits to beneficiaries..

The key requirements of SPS 250 are that an RSE licensee must:

  • have in place an insurance management framework to manage the making available of insured benefits to beneficiaries. This includes monitoring and review of the insurance management framework at appropriate intervals;
  • meet minimum requirements which must be documented in the RSE licensees’ insurance strategy[3]; and
  • formulate and give effect to appropriate selection processes for, and due diligence of, insurers and monitor relationships with insurers on an ongoing basis.

3.             Consultation

In September 2011, APRA released for public consultation a discussion paper, Prudential Standards for Superannuation, which outlined proposals, including those Stronger Super reforms that the Government had recommended APRA implement in prudential standards. A suite of 12 prudential standards, including a standard dealing with insurance, was described in the paper. APRA received 41 written submissions in response to this discussion paper, presented the reforms via a wide range of industry forums and held discussions with a variety of industry participants.  

In a second consultation round, APRA released a Response to Submissions – Prudential standards for superannuation and a package of 11 draft prudential standards on 27 April 2012. In the response, APRA outlined the significant issues raised in the submissions and APRA’s proposed response to them.

APRA received 38 written submissions in response to the draft prudential standards; again, APRA also presented the reforms at industry forums and met with individual industry participants on the proposed requirements.

APRA took note of the issues raised in submissions on the draft standard and the final version of SPS 250 incorporates a number of changes including clarification of what is expected when reviewing the insurance management framework.

There was also adjustment to the provisions that referred to a proposed restriction on insurance only being acquired from a life company which is registered or taken to be registered under section 21 of the Life Insurance Act 1995. The effect of this change is that insurance can be acquired from both life insurers and general insurance companies or Lloyd’s underwriters authorised under the Insurance Act 1973.

4.             Regulation Impact Statement

A Regulation Impact Statement is required for the superannuation prudential standards.

5.             Statement of compatibility prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

The legislative instrument the subject of this explanatory statement does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. Accordingly, in APRA’s assessment, this legislative instrument is compatible with human rights.

 

 

[1]  Paragraphs 28 and 29 of Prudential Standard SPS 250 Insurance in Superannuation (SPS 250) commence on the date of registration of the instrument on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments. SPS 250 otherwise commences on 1 July 2013.

[2]  Stronger Super, Recommendation 10.2, p. 60.

[3]  Refer to s. 52(7) of the Act which sets out the insurance covenants.  

Overview

The Superannuation (prudential standard) determination No. 5 of 2012, issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) under section 34C(1) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993, was enacted to establish prudential standards for superannuation entities, particularly in relation to the provision of insured benefits to beneficiaries. This determination, which took effect upon its registration on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments, was driven by the need to implement the Government's superannuation reforms and align superannuation prudential requirements with those of other APRA-regulated industries. APRA was authorised to create such prudential standards following the enactment of the Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Trustee Obligations and Prudential Standards) Act 2012. The overarching aim of this instrument is to ensure that Registered Superannuation Entities (RSE) licensees adhere to stringent prudential requirements when providing insured benefits, including establishing robust insurance management frameworks and adhering to documented insurance strategies. APRA undertook extensive consultation with the industry, receiving and considering feedback from various stakeholders before finalising the Prudential Standard SPS 250.

Scope and Application

The Superannuation (prudential standard) determination No. 5 of 2012 applies to all Responsible Superannuation Entity (RSE) licensees of registrable superannuation entities (RSEs) across Australia, given the national scope of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 under which the determination is made. This encompasses entities that provide or manage superannuation funds, including industry, retail, and public sector funds, as well as corporate and retail superannuation trustees. The determination specifically targets the prudential requirements for managing insured benefits within superannuation funds, ensuring that RSE licensees have robust insurance management frameworks, comply with minimum documented requirements, and maintain ongoing oversight of their relationships with insurers. The geographic reach of this determination is national, as it applies to all RSE licensees regardless of the state or territory in which they operate. The instrument does not explicitly state exclusions or thresholds but focuses on setting comprehensive standards for insurance management within superannuation funds. The application and enforcement of these standards may be further refined or extended through subordinate instruments issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in accordance with the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993.

Key Provisions

The Superannuation (prudential standard) determination No. 5 of 2012 sets forth the Prudential Standard SPS 250 Insurance in Superannuation (SPS 250), which outlines the prudential requirements for Responsible Superannuation Entity (RSE) licensees in relation to the provision of insured benefits to beneficiaries. RSE licensees are mandated to establish an insurance management framework to manage the provision of these benefits, including regular monitoring and review (section 2). Furthermore, they must adhere to minimum requirements as documented in their insurance strategy (section 3). Additionally, RSE licensees are required to develop and implement appropriate selection processes for insurers, conduct due diligence, and maintain ongoing monitoring of relationships with insurers (section 4). RSE licensees governed by SPS 250 have several obligations. They must ensure their insurance management framework is robust and compliant, regularly reviewed, and documented in their insurance strategy. This strategy must meet the minimum requirements specified in the standard, and RSE licensees must formulate and execute selection processes for insurers, perform due diligence, and continuously monitor their insurer relationships. These obligations are aimed at ensuring that insured benefits provided to superannuation beneficiaries are managed in a prudent manner. Failure to comply with SPS 250 may lead to enforcement actions by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA). While the explanatory statement does not specify the exact penalties, non-compliance with prudential standards generally can result in a range of actions from warnings and directions to more severe measures such as financial penalties, restrictions on operations, or even revocation of a licensee's authorisation. The specific consequences will depend on the nature and severity of the non-compliance.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Regulatory Standards
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Regulatory Standards
Licensing & Registration
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.