Superannuation (CSS) Approved Authority Declaration No. 13 1993 No. 2
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
STATUTORY RULES 1993 No. 2
Issued by the authority of the Minister for Finance
Superannuation Act 1976
Declaration under paragraph (a) of the definition of 'approved authority' in subsection 3(1)
The Superannuation Act 1976 (the Act) makes provision for and in relation to an occupational superannuation scheme (the CSS) for Commonwealth employees and certain other persons. In accordance with the definitions of 'eligible employee', 'permanent employee' and 'temporary employee' in subsection 3(1) of the Act, persons who may become members of the CSS include persons employed in a permanent or temporary capacity by an approved authority.
The definition of the term 'approved authority' in subsection 3(1) of the Act provides that 'approved authority' means
(a) an authority or other body of a kind described in paragraph (a) of the definition that is declared by the Minister for Finance to be an approved authority for the purposes of the Act; and
(b) an authority or body that was, immediately before 1 July 1976, an approved authority for the purposes of the Superannuation Act 1922 (other than such an authority or body in relation to which a declaration under subsection 3(2A) of the Act is in force).
The provisions of the Australian and Overseas Telecommunications Corporation Act 1991 (the AOTC Act) had the effect of merging the Australian Telecommunications Corporation (Telecom) and OTC Limited into the Australian and Overseas Telecommunications Corporation. Section 35 of the AOTC Act provides that an instrument that refers to Telecom or OTC Limited shall continue to have effect according to its tenor except that a reference to the corporation in the instrument shall be read as a reference to AOTC.
Staff of Telecom and OTC Limited transferred to employment with AOTC on 1 February 1992. Immediately before that date, OTC Limited was an approved authority for the purposes of the Act. Telecom was not such an approved authority and CSS membership arrangements for staff of Telecom were provided for in the Superannuation (Continuing Contributions for Benefits) Regulations under the Act.
The effect of section 35 of the AOTC Act was that AOTC became an approved authority for the purposes of the Act. It is intended that CSS membership arrangements for staff of AOTC be made available through the provisions of the Superannuation (Continuing Contributions for Benefits) Regulations and that AOTC not be an approved authority. To this end, amendments to the Superannuation (Continuing Contributions for Benefits) Regulations have been made which provide for the continuation of CSS membership arrangements for those staff of AOTC who transferred from Telecom or OTC Limited.
The declaration contained in the Statutory Rule, and cited as 'Superannuation (CSS) Approved Authority Declaration No. 13' provides that AOTC is not an approved authority for the purposes of the Act.
In accordance with section 4A of the Act, a declaration for the purposes of paragraph (a) of the definition of 'approved authority' is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 and a Statutory Rule for the purposes of the Statutory Rules Publication Act 1903. and may be expressed to have taken effect from and including a day not earlier than 12 months before the making of the declaration.
The declaration is expressed to be taken to have commenced on 1 February 1992.
Overview
The Superannuation (CSS) Approved Authority Declaration No. 13 was enacted in 1993 by the Minister for Finance under the Superannuation Act 1976. This legislation addresses the need to clarify the status of the Australian and Overseas Telecommunications Corporation (AOTC) within the context of the Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme (CSS) following the merger of Telecom and OTC Limited. The Superannuation Act 1976 aims to provide for an occupational superannuation scheme for Commonwealth employees and certain other persons, and the declaration ensures that AOTC is not recognised as an approved authority for the purposes of the Act, aligning with the intent that CSS membership arrangements for staff of AOTC be managed through other regulatory means. The policy objective is to maintain consistency in the CSS membership arrangements by ensuring that the transition of staff from Telecom and OTC Limited to AOTC does not alter their eligibility for the scheme, as intended by the regulatory amendments made to the Superannuation (Continuing Contributions for Benefits) Regulations.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Act 1976 provides for the establishment and operation of an occupational superannuation scheme (the CSS) for Commonwealth employees and certain other persons. The Act applies to individuals who are eligible employees, which includes those employed in a permanent or temporary capacity by an approved authority. These approved authorities are entities declared by the Minister for Finance under the Act, or those that were previously approved authorities under the Superannuation Act 1922 before it was repealed on 1 July 1976, unless they are specifically excluded by a declaration under subsection 3(2A) of the Act. The legislation's reach is national, applying to Commonwealth employees and those associated with approved authorities across Australia. The application of the Act may be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, such as regulations, which can detail specific membership arrangements and operational guidelines. Notably, while the Australian and Overseas Telecommunications Corporation (AOTC) was initially considered an approved authority due to the merger of Telecom and OTC Limited, a specific declaration has been made to exclude AOTC from being an approved authority for the purposes of the Act, thereby ensuring that CSS membership arrangements for its staff are governed by regulations rather than the Act itself.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation (CSS) Approved Authority Declaration No. 13, issued under the Superannuation Act 1976, serves to declare that the Australian and Overseas Telecommunications Corporation (AOTC) is not an approved authority for the purposes of the Act (section 3(1)(a)). This declaration means that AOTC does not qualify as an entity whose employees can automatically be members of the Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme (CSS). Instead, the declaration aligns with the legislative intent to ensure that CSS membership arrangements for staff of AOTC are handled through the Superannuation (Continuing Contributions for Benefits) Regulations, rather than through the approval of AOTC as an authority under the Act. This decision follows the merger of Telecom and OTC Limited into AOTC, where OTC Limited was previously recognised as an approved authority.
The Act imposes specific obligations and requirements on entities and their employees regarding CSS membership. For entities declared as approved authorities, their employees are automatically eligible for CSS membership. However, since AOTC is not an approved authority, its employees do not automatically qualify for CSS membership. Instead, the Act requires that specific arrangements be made under the Superannuation (Continuing Contributions for Benefits) Regulations to ensure these employees continue to receive the benefits of the scheme. The declaration ensures that AOTC’s employees are not left out of the CSS, maintaining continuity in their superannuation arrangements.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Superannuation Act 1976, including the requirements outlined in the declaration, may lead to legal consequences. The Act does not explicitly state specific penalties for non-compliance in this context, but general provisions within the Act and related legislation could imply that breaches could result in civil or criminal penalties. For instance, if the declaration is not properly followed, it could lead to financial or administrative penalties for the entity involved, and potentially, legal action against individuals responsible for non-compliance. The precise nature and extent of penalties would depend on the specific circumstances and the provisions of other relevant laws.