EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Issued by the Authority of the Attorney‑General
Family Law Act 1975
Summary Courts Jurisdiction (Matrimonial Causes and Children) Proclamation 2007
Subsection 39(7) of the Family Law Act 1975 (the Act) provides that the Governor‑General may fix a date by Proclamation on and after which proceedings in relation to matters arising under Part V (matrimonial causes) may not be instituted in, or transferred to, a court of summary jurisdiction in a specified State or Territory. Paragraph 39(7AAA)(b) of the Act provides that a Proclamation under subsection 39(7) may be expressed to apply to the institution of proceedings in, or the transfer of proceedings to, a court of summary jurisdiction in a specified part of a State or Territory.
Subsection 69J(3) of the Act provides that the Governor-General may fix a date by Proclamation on and after which proceedings in relation to matters arising under Part VII (children) may not be instituted in, or transferred to, a court of summary jurisdiction in a specified State or Territory. Paragraph 69J(4)(b) of the Act provides that a Proclamation under subsection 69J(3) may be expressed to apply to the institution of proceedings in, or the transfer of proceedings to, a court of summary jurisdiction in a specified part of a State or Territory.
The Proclamation states that, on and after 23 April 2007, proceedings under Part V (matrimonial causes) and Part VII (children) of the Act may not be instituted in, or transferred to, the Downing Centre Local Court, the Central Local Court Sydney, the Local Court North Sydney and the Local Court Newtown, all located in New South Wales.
The NSW Government relocated the St James Local Court Sydney to the Children’s Court complex in Parramatta on 13 November 2006. The St James Court had provided specialist family law services pursuant to an agreement between the Commonwealth and NSW under the Act. The NSW Attorney General subsequently requested a Proclamation be made to prevent family law proceedings that would previously have been dealt with in the St James Court being lodged in, or transferred to, nearby Local Courts that lack specialist family law expertise. The presence of the Family Court of Australia and the Federal Magistrates Court in the Sydney CBD presents an alternative to matters being instituted in or transferred to the Local Courts.
The Proclamation is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 and commences on 23 April 2007.
The Office of Best Practice Regulation was consulted about this legislative instrument and advised that a Regulation Impact Statement was not mandatory as it did not have a direct or significant indirect impact on business. The Family Court of Australia and the Federal Magistrates Court were consulted and did not oppose this legislative instrument.
Overview
The Family Law Act 1975 was enacted to provide a comprehensive legal framework for family law matters in Australia. The Summary Courts Jurisdiction (Matrimonial Causes and Children) Proclamation 2007, issued under the authority of the Governor-General, aims to address the issue of family law proceedings being improperly instituted or transferred to local courts that lack the requisite specialist expertise. This legislative instrument, which came into effect on 23 April 2007, specifically restricts the institution or transfer of proceedings under Part V (matrimonial causes) and Part VII (children) of the Act to certain local courts in New South Wales. This measure was introduced in response to the relocation of the St James Local Court Sydney, which had previously handled specialist family law services, to ensure that such proceedings are handled by courts with the appropriate expertise. The policy objective is to maintain the integrity and effectiveness of family law proceedings by directing them to courts that are better equipped to handle these matters.
Scope and Application
The Summary Courts Jurisdiction (Matrimonial Causes and Children) Proclamation 2007, made under the Family Law Act 1975, outlines specific provisions concerning the jurisdiction of summary courts in relation to family law matters. This legislation applies to proceedings under Part V (matrimonial causes) and Part VII (children) of the Family Law Act 1975, restricting their institution or transfer to certain local courts in New South Wales. Specifically, the Proclamation prohibits such proceedings from being instituted in or transferred to the Downing Centre Local Court, the Central Local Court Sydney, the Local Court North Sydney, and the Local Court Newtown, effective from 23 April 2007. This measure was introduced to ensure that family law matters receive appropriate specialist handling, following the relocation of the St James Local Court Sydney, which previously provided such services under an agreement with the Commonwealth. The Proclamation also extends to the Local Court in Parramatta, reflecting the jurisdictional adjustments necessary to maintain the integrity and expertise of family law proceedings. The application of this Proclamation is confined to the specified local courts within New South Wales, and it does not impact other states or territories.
Key Provisions
The Family Law Act 1975 (the Act) includes provisions that allow the Governor-General to issue a Proclamation to specify a date from which certain family law proceedings can no longer be instituted in or transferred to courts of summary jurisdiction in particular States or Territories. Specifically, subsection 39(7) of the Act allows for such a Proclamation in relation to matrimonial causes under Part V of the Act, and subsection 69J(3) allows for a similar Proclamation in relation to children's matters under Part VII of the Act. These provisions empower the Governor-General to designate specific courts or parts of courts where such proceedings will be prohibited. In this instance, the Proclamation made on 23 April 2007, restricts the institution or transfer of proceedings related to matrimonial causes and children's matters to the Downing Centre Local Court, the Central Local Court Sydney, the Local Court North Sydney, and the Local Court Newtown in New South Wales.
The obligations under this Proclamation require that any proceedings related to matrimonial causes and children's matters cannot be initiated or transferred to the specified Local Courts in New South Wales as of the effective date of the Proclamation. This change was necessitated by the relocation of the St James Local Court Sydney to the Children’s Court complex in Parramatta, which had previously provided specialist family law services under an agreement between the Commonwealth and the New South Wales Government. As a result of this relocation, the NSW Attorney-General requested that a Proclamation be issued to ensure that proceedings are not inadvertently filed in Local Courts that do not possess the requisite specialist family law expertise. This measure ensures that family law matters are directed to courts that are appropriately equipped to handle such cases.
In terms of consequences, there are no explicit offences or penalties outlined in the Proclamation itself for breaching the restrictions it imposes. However, any breach of the restrictions could potentially lead to legal challenges regarding the validity of proceedings instituted or transferred in violation of the Proclamation. The Family Court of Australia and the Federal Magistrates Court, which are alternatives for such matters in the Sydney CBD, are authorised to handle these cases. The intent is to maintain the integrity of family law proceedings by ensuring they are managed by courts with the necessary expertise and resources.
It is noteworthy that the Office of Best Practice Regulation was consulted regarding this legislative instrument and determined that a Regulation Impact Statement was not mandatory as the Proclamation did not have a direct or significant indirect impact on business operations. Additionally, the Family Court of Australia and the Federal Magistrates Court were consulted and did not oppose the Proclamation, highlighting the alignment of this measure with existing judicial structures designed to manage family law matters effectively.