Statement of Principles concerning trigeminal neuralgia No. 54 of 2009

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2009L03215 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 54 of 2009

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) revokes Instrument No. 23 of 1995 determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning trigeminal neuralgia and death from trigeminal neuralgia.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that trigeminal neuralgia and death from trigeminal neuralgia can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 54 of 2009 concerning trigeminal neuralgia.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statement of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting trigeminal neuralgia or death from trigeminal neuralgia, with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This new instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 28 June 2006 concerning trigeminal neuralgia in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of the new Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instrument.  Comparing the new and the revoked Instruments, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
  • revising the definition of 'trigeminal neuralgia' in clause 3;
  • revising factor 6(a) concerning 'multiple sclerosis';
  • new factor 6(b) concerning 'mass lesion' which incorporates the previous factors concerning 'tumours' and 'vascular lesions';
  • new factors 6(c) and 6(i) concerning 'cerebrovascular accident';
  • revising factor 6(d) concerning 'inflammatory connective tissue disease';
  • new factor 6(e) concerning 'benign osseous lesion' which incorporates the previous factor concerning 'Paget's disease of the skull';
  • new factors 6(f) and 6(l) concerning 'localised infection';
  • delete factors concerning 'cerebral malaria' and 'leprosy';
  • new factor 6(g) concerning 'multiple sclerosis';
  • new factor 6(h) concerning 'mass lesion';
  • new factor 6(j) concerning 'inflammatory connective tissue disease';
  • new factor 6(k) concerning 'benign osseous lesion';
  • new definition of 'a benign osseous lesion', 'a mass lesion', 'a localised infection from the specified list', 'an inflammatory connective tissue disease from the specified list', 'death from trigeminal neuralgia', 'relevant service' and 'terminal event' in clause 9;
  • delete definitions of 'cerebral malarial', 'connective tissue diseases', 'ICD code', 'leprosy', 'multiple sclerosis', 'Paget's disease', and 'tumour'; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to trigeminal neuralgia in the Government Notices Gazette of 28 June 2006, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

9.             On 22 April 2009, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority. This letter emphasised the deletion of factors relating to cerebral malaria and leprosy. The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed instrument prior to its determination. No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority.

 

10.         The determining of this new instrument finalises the investigation in relation to trigeminal neuralgia as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 28 June 2006.

 

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

 

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 54 of 2009, under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA), revokes the previous Instrument No. 23 of 1995 concerning trigeminal neuralgia. This change addresses the need for updated medical-scientific evidence relating trigeminal neuralgia and death from trigeminal neuralgia to specific types of military service. The Authority's determination of a new Statement of Principles aims to ensure that claims for compensation are assessed accurately and fairly, considering the latest available evidence. This legislative instrument was enacted by the Repatriation Medical Authority and follows an investigation into the condition, incorporating revisions that reflect the latest medical understanding and the commencement of the MRCA. The Authority's primary policy objective is to ensure that veterans and their families receive appropriate compensation for service-related health conditions, based on sound medical-scientific evidence.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 54 of 2009, concerning trigeminal neuralgia, applies to persons who have served in the Australian Defence Force and are claiming compensation for trigeminal neuralgia or death from trigeminal neuralgia under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 or the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This instrument establishes the criteria that must be met to establish a connection between the condition and specific types of service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, warlike, and non-warlike service. The instrument replaces a previous instrument concerning trigeminal neuralgia, and its provisions apply nationwide, with the Authority determining the eligibility of claims for compensation. Exclusions and exemptions are detailed within the instrument, which may exclude certain conditions or circumstances. The Authority may extend or restrict the application of this instrument through subordinate instruments as necessary.

Key Provisions

The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) has issued Instrument No. 54 of 2009 under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA). This instrument revokes Instrument No. 23 of 1995, which dealt with trigeminal neuralgia and death from trigeminal neuralgia, and replaces it with a new Statement of Principles. The Authority has determined this new instrument based on sound medical-scientific evidence indicating a link between trigeminal neuralgia and specific types of military service. The new Statement of Principles outlines the minimum factors that must be present and related to certain types of service, such as operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, warlike, and non-warlike service, for a reasonable hypothesis to be raised that trigeminal neuralgia or death from trigeminal neuralgia was connected to the service circumstances. The new instrument adopts a revised format and includes updated definitions and factors, reflecting the latest medical evidence and the commencement of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). The new instrument imposes obligations on claimants, medical practitioners, and the Authority itself. Claimants must provide evidence that connects their trigeminal neuralgia or death from trigeminal neuralgia to their service, in accordance with the factors outlined in the Statement of Principles. Medical practitioners are required to provide accurate and comprehensive medical reports that support the claimant's case. The Authority is obligated to review all submissions and medical evidence thoroughly to determine the validity of each claim based on the criteria established in the new Statement of Principles. The Authority also has the duty to advertise its intention to investigate and determine the new instrument, allowing relevant stakeholders to provide input and representations. Breach of the obligations under the new instrument may lead to civil and criminal consequences. For instance, providing false or misleading information in a claim can result in civil penalties, including fines and potential legal action. In more severe cases, providing false information may also constitute a criminal offence, leading to criminal prosecution and penalties, which can include imprisonment. The specific penalties for civil and criminal breaches are not detailed in the explanatory statement but are governed by the general legal frameworks under which the VEA and MRCA operate. The Authority is empowered to enforce these penalties to ensure compliance with the legislative requirements.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.