Statement of Principles concerning tooth loss (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 29 of 2025)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2025L00151 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

TOOTH LOSS

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 29 OF 2025)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1.              This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning tooth loss (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 29 of 2025).

Background

  1.              The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 124 of 2015* (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2015L01678) determined under subsections 196B(2) and (8) of the VEA concerning loss of teeth.
  2.              The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that tooth loss and death from tooth loss can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning tooth loss (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 29 of 2025).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

  1.              The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).
  2.              The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting tooth loss or death from tooth loss, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

  1.              This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 7 November 2023 concerning loss of teeth in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.
  2.              The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'tooth loss' in subsection 7(2);
  • revising the reference to 'ICD-10-AM code' in subsection 7(4);
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(5) concerning having a fracture of the affected tooth;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(6) concerning having luxation of the affected tooth;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(7) concerning having traumatic avulsion;
  • factor concerning having avulsion and subsequent replantation subsumed by factor in subsection 9(7) concerning having traumatic avulsion;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(8) concerning having a fracture of the alveolar bone;
  • new factor in subsection 9(9) concerning undergoing a course of radiotherapy;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(10) concerning having pericoronitis;
  • new factor in subsection 9(11) concerning taking ribavirin;
  • deleting factor concerning having tooth wear; and
  • deleting the definitions of 'avulsion', 'disruption of the alveolar bone', 'fracture of the affected tooth' and 'pericoronitis'.

Consultation

  1.              Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to loss of teeth in the Government Notices Gazette of 7 November 2023, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.
  2.              On 22 November 2024, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority.  This letter emphasised the deletion of factors relating to having tooth wear.  The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed Instrument prior to its determination.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority.  No changes were made to the proposed Instrument following this consultation process.

Human Rights

  1.          This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

  1.          The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to loss of teeth as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 7 November 2023.

References

  1.          A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 29 of 2025

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Tooth loss

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have tooth loss;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting tooth loss with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 124 of 2015; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning tooth loss which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning tooth loss (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 29 of 2025), introduced under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, was enacted to address the medical-scientific evidence linking tooth loss with particular kinds of military service. The Repatriation Medical Authority, acting under the authority granted by the Veterans' Entitlements Act, determined this Statement of Principles to replace the previously repealed Instrument No. 124 of 2015. The objective of this legislation is to facilitate claims and assessments by specifying the conditions under which medical treatment and compensation for tooth loss can be extended to eligible individuals who have served in various capacities, thereby ensuring that the claims process is informed by the latest medical-scientific evidence. This legislation aims to ensure that claimants and the relevant commissions can accurately assess and determine the eligibility for benefits related to tooth loss, while also promoting human rights such as the right to social security and an adequate standard of living for veterans and their dependents. By doing so, it reflects the evolving understanding of the medical-scientific evidence concerning tooth loss and ensures that the rights of veterans and service members are upheld without discrimination.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning tooth loss (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 29 of 2025) applies to veterans and current or former members of the Defence Force who have suffered tooth loss. This legislation operates within the framework of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). It outlines the circumstances under which a reasonable hypothesis can be established that connects tooth loss with specific service conditions, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, British nuclear test defence service, warlike, and non-warlike service. The instrument is designed to facilitate the assessment and approval of claims for medical treatment and compensation related to tooth loss by detailing the minimum factors that must be present, as supported by sound medical-scientific evidence. The instrument supersedes the previously repealed Statement of Principles No. 124 of 2015 and incorporates updated medical-scientific evidence. There are no stated exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds specified in this legislation, though the application and interpretation of the principles may be influenced by subordinate instruments that extend or clarify the primary Act. This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights, promoting various rights of veterans and Defence Force members, including the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. It ensures these rights are exercised without discrimination, aligning with international human rights standards. The instrument's purpose is to enhance the quality of medico-scientific outcomes for claimants under the VEA and the MRCA, ultimately supporting the fair and transparent assessment of claims related to tooth loss.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Statement of Principles concerning tooth loss (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 29 of 2025) detail the specific factors that must be present to establish a reasonable hypothesis linking tooth loss to particular kinds of military service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, British nuclear test defence, warlike, and non-warlike service. Section 5 of the instrument outlines these factors, which must be related to the service rendered by a person to qualify for benefits under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). The instrument replaces the previous Statement of Principles No. 124 of 2015, reflecting updated medical-scientific evidence. The Act imposes specific obligations and requirements on claimants and relevant authorities. Claimants must provide evidence that the factors specified in the Statement of Principles are related to their service. The Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission are required to assess claims based on these factors, ensuring that benefits are awarded in accordance with the sound medical-scientific evidence provided. The Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal are responsible for reviewing decisions made by these commissions. The instrument also facilitates the review process by clearly outlining the criteria for eligibility. The Statement of Principles does not explicitly detail offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breaches within its content. However, the broader legislative framework under which it operates, including the VEA and MRCA, may impose penalties for fraudulent claims or misrepresentation of facts. The maximum penalties for such offences can include fines and imprisonment, depending on the severity of the breach and relevant jurisdictional laws. Claimants found to have provided false information could face legal action, leading to the denial of benefits and potential criminal charges. The instrument is designed to promote the human rights of veterans and their dependants, ensuring that their entitlements are determined based on sound medical-scientific evidence. It facilitates the provision of social security benefits, thereby upholding the right to an adequate standard of living and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. The instrument is compatible with human rights, as it does not derogate from any human rights and promotes the rights of veterans and their families without discrimination.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Prohibited Conduct

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.