Statement of Principles concerning systemic lupus erythematosus (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 47 of 2025)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2025L00502 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 47 OF 2025)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1.              This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning systemic lupus erythematosus (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 47 of 2025).

Background

  1.              The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 21 of 2016 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2016L00262) determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning systemic lupus erythematosus.
  2.              The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that systemic lupus erythematosus and death from systemic lupus erythematosus can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning systemic lupus erythematosus (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 47 of 2025).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

  1.              The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).
  2.              The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting systemic lupus erythematosus or death from systemic lupus erythematosus, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

  1.              This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 7 November 2023 concerning systemic lupus erythematosus in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.
  2.              The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'systemic lupus erythematosus' in subsection 7(2);
  • revising ICD-10-AM codes for 'systemic lupus erythematosus' in subsection 7(3);
  • revising the reference to 'ICD-10-AM code' in subsection 7(4);
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(1) concerning being exposed to sunlight, for clinical worsening only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(2) concerning inhaling respirable crystalline silica dust for a cumulative period;
  • new factor in subsection 9(3) concerning inhaling respirable crystalline silica dust in an amount greater than;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(4) concerning smoking;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(5) concerning taking one of the following medications;
  • new factor in subsection 9(6) concerning taking sulfadiazine or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(7) concerning taking a medication;
  • new factor in subsection 9(11) concerning undergoing a thymectomy;
  • new factor in subsection 9(12) concerning having posttraumatic stress disorder;
  • deleting factor concerning being exposed to sunlight, for clinical onset only
  • new definitions of 'micrograms/m3-years' and 'one pack-year' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary; and
  • deleting the definitions of 'pack-years of cigarettes, or the equivalent thereof in other tobacco products' and 'specified list of drugs'.

Consultation

  1.              Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to systemic lupus erythematosus in the Government Notices Gazette of 11 November 2023, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.
  2.              On 3 February 2025, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority.  This letter emphasised the deletion of the factor relating to being exposed to sunlight or ultraviolet light.  The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed Instrument prior to its determination.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority.  No changes were made to the proposed Instrument following this consultation process.

Human Rights

  1.          This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

  1.          The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to systemic lupus erythematosus as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 11 November 2023.

References

  1.          A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

 


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 47 of 2025

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Systemic lupus erythematosus

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have systemic lupus erythematosus;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting systemic lupus erythematosus with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 21 of 2016; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning systemic lupus erythematosus which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning systemic lupus erythematosus (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 47 of 2025) was enacted in 2025 under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This legislation was introduced to address the need for an updated framework that reflects the latest medical-scientific evidence regarding the connection between systemic lupus erythematosus and military service. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) determined this statement of principles following an investigation into the condition, which was advertised in the Government Notices Gazette in November 2023. The primary objective of this instrument is to facilitate the assessment of claims related to systemic lupus erythematosus by establishing the minimum factors that must exist to connect the disease with particular kinds of military service, thereby ensuring that claimants can access appropriate medical treatment and compensation. This legislation aims to provide clarity and support for veterans and service personnel by specifying the conditions under which systemic lupus erythematosus can be reasonably hypothesised to be related to their service. It replaces the previous Statement of Principles No. 21 of 2016, incorporating recent advancements in medical-scientific evidence. The Authority consulted with relevant organisations and stakeholders during the process but received no submissions, leading to the finalisation of this instrument. The legislation is designed to be compatible with human rights, promoting the rights of veterans, service personnel, and their dependents by ensuring accessible and equitable social security and healthcare benefits.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning systemic lupus erythematosus (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 47 of 2025) applies to eligible persons, particularly veterans and current or former members of the Australian Defence Force, who are seeking medical treatment and compensation under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This legislation identifies the minimum factors that must be present and related to specific kinds of service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service under the VEA, as well as warlike and non-warlike service under the MRCA, for a reasonable hypothesis to be raised connecting systemic lupus erythematosus or death from systemic lupus erythematosus with the service circumstances. The Instrument operates nationally as it is determined under the VEA and the MRCA, both of which have federal jurisdiction. The application of the Instrument is not restricted by any explicit exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds, but rather relies on the presence of the specified factors related to the service. Subordinate instruments may further clarify or extend the application of this Statement of Principles, ensuring its effective implementation and adaptation to new medical-scientific evidence. This Instrument replaces the previously repealed Instrument No. 21 of 2016, reflecting advancements in the available medical-scientific evidence concerning systemic lupus erythematosus. It facilitates the assessment and determination of claims by the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission and supports the review processes by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. By setting out the necessary factors for a reasonable hypothesis, the Instrument ensures that claimants and relevant authorities can navigate the complex process of connecting systemic lupus erythematosus with service circumstances, thereby promoting the human rights of veterans and Defence Force members, including their right to social security and health.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning systemic lupus erythematosus (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 47 of 2025) outlines the medical-scientific evidence that links systemic lupus erythematosus to specific types of service rendered by individuals. This document replaces the previous Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 21 of 2016, and serves to clarify the factors that must be present to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting systemic lupus erythematosus with particular service circumstances. This Statement of Principles is crucial for the assessment of claims under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). It specifies the minimum factors that need to exist and be related to certain types of service, such as operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service under the VEA, and warlike or non-warlike service under the MRCA, before a connection between systemic lupus erythematosus and the service can be reasonably hypothesised. The Statement of Principles imposes several obligations on the parties involved. Claimants must demonstrate that the specified factors are present and related to their service. The Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission are required to assess claims based on the criteria set out in the Statement of Principles, ensuring that the assessment process is guided by the most current medical-scientific evidence. The Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal are also obligated to review decisions made under the VEA and the MRCA, using the Statement of Principles as a benchmark for their evaluations. Violations or breaches of the provisions outlined in the Statement of Principles do not directly result in specific offences, penalties, or civil or criminal consequences under the VEA or the MRCA. However, the failure to adhere to the criteria set forth in the Statement of Principles may lead to the denial of claims for compensation or benefits. Claimants whose claims are not substantiated by the necessary evidence as per the Statement of Principles may face difficulties in obtaining the benefits to which they might otherwise be entitled. The primary consequence of non-compliance is therefore the potential rejection of claims rather than formal penalties or sanctions. The Statement of Principles is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from any human rights and promotes several rights, including the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. By facilitating the assessment and determination of claims for social security benefits, medical treatment, and compensation, the Statement of Principles supports the rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents. It ensures that these rights are exercised without discrimination, aligning with international human rights standards.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.