Statement of Principles concerning substance use disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 50 of 2026)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2026L00774 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 50 OF 2026)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1.              This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning substance use disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 50 of 2026).

Background

  1.              The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 59 of 2017 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2017L01444) determined under subsection/s 196B(2) and (8) of the VEA concerning substance use disorder.
  2.              The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that substance use disorder and death from substance use disorder can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning substance use disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 50 of 2026). This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

  1.              The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).
  2.              The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting substance use disorder or death from substance use disorder, with the circumstances of that service. The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

  1.              This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 28 August 2025 concerning substance use disorder in accordance with section 196G of the VEA. The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.
  2.              The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'substance use disorder' in subsection 7(2);
  • including ICD-10-AM codes for 'substance use disorder' in subsection 7(3) (where applicable);
  • including the reference to 'ICD-10-AM code' in subsection 7(4) (where applicable);
  • revising subsection 10(2) to clarify that only the clinical worsening aspect of the factors in section 9 apply in relation to material contribution to, or aggravation of, bronchiectasis. This replaces the previous reference to factors 9(10) to 9(18) for consistency of format;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(1) concerning ‘clinically significant disorder of mental health and combining separate clinical onset and clinical worsening factors into a single factor;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(2) concerning category 1A stressor to combine separate clinical onset and clinical worsening factors into a single factor;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(3) concerning category 1B stressor to combine separate clinical onset and clinical worsening factors into a single factor;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(4) concerning category 2 stressor and combining separate clinical onset and clinical worsening factors into a single factor;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(5) concerning the death of a person and combining separate clinical onset and clinical worsening factors into a single factor;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(6) concerning experience as a child and combining separate clinical onset and clinical worsening factors into a single factor;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(7) concerning taking a medically prescribed substance at the time of clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(8) concerning persistent pain and combining separate clinical onset and clinical worsening factors into a single factor;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(11) concerning inability to obtain appropriate clinical management before clinical worsening only;
  • new factor in subsection 9(9) concerning a morally injurious event;
  • new factor in subsection 9(10) concerning intimate partner violence;
  • deleting the factors concerning medical illness or injury as these are now covered by the factor in subsection 9(4) concerning category 2 stressor;
  • new definitions of ‘DSM-5-TR’, ‘clinically significant disorder of mental health’, ‘witness’, ‘morally injurious event’, ‘intimate partner violence’, ‘intimate partner relationship’ and ‘intimate partner’ in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • revising the definitions of ‘substance’, ‘category 1B stressor’, ‘category 2 stressor’,  in Schedule 1 - Dictionary; and
  • deleting the definitions of ‘DSM-5’, ‘clinically significant disorder of mental health as specified’, ‘eyewitness’, ‘corpse’, ‘significant other’, ‘severe childhood abuse’, ‘persistent pain’.

Incorporation

  1.              This Instrument incorporates by reference the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR), Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2022. A copy of this document can be obtained upon application in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority either via our website at www.rma.gov.au or postal address GPO Box 1014, Brisbane, Queensland 4001.
  2.              This Instrument refers to The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM), Tenth Edition, effective date of 1 July 2017, copyrighted by the Independent Hospital Pricing Authority, ISBN 978-1-76007-296-4.

The reference to the ICD-10-AM in this instrument is included for contextual and explanatory purposes only. Although not incorporated by reference, information about the ICD-10-AM can be obtained upon application in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority either via our website at www.rma.gov.au or postal address GPO Box 1014, Brisbane, Queensland 4001.

Consultation

  1.          Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to substance use disorder in the Government Notices Gazette of 28 August 2025, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants. The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field. No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

Human Rights

  1.          This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

  1.          The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to substance use disorder as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 28 August 2025.

References

  1.          A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 50 of 2026

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Substance use disorder

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA). Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have substance use disorder;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting substance use disorder with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 59 of 2017; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning substance use disorder which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning substance use disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 50 of 2026) was enacted to address the need for a comprehensive and updated framework for determining the eligibility of veterans and military personnel for compensation related to substance use disorder. This legislative instrument was introduced by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the authority conferred by the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. The primary objective of this legislation is to facilitate the assessment and determination of claims for compensation, ensuring that claimants receive appropriate medical treatment and benefits in accordance with the latest medical-scientific evidence. This Statement of Principles replaces an earlier instrument, reflecting advancements in the understanding of substance use disorder and its connection to specific military services. The Statement of Principles outlines the minimum factors that must be present to establish a reasonable hypothesis linking substance use disorder to particular types of military service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, and warlike and non-warlike service under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. By specifying these factors, the legislation aims to provide clarity and consistency in the assessment process, ensuring that claimants receive fair and timely consideration of their applications. This instrument is designed to improve the quality of outcomes for veterans and service personnel by ensuring that the criteria for compensation are based on the most current and reliable medical evidence available.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning substance use disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 50 of 2026) applies to individuals who have served in the Australian Defence Force and are seeking compensation or benefits under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This Act is applicable across the Commonwealth of Australia and is intended to provide clarity and guidance on the medical-scientific evidence linking substance use disorder with specific types of military service. The Statement of Principles outlines the factors that must exist to establish a reasonable hypothesis that a veteran's substance use disorder is related to their service, which includes operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service under the VEA, as well as warlike and non-warlike service under the MRCA. This instrument replaces the previously repealed Statement of Principles No. 59 of 2017 and incorporates updated definitions and factors based on the latest medical-scientific evidence. The application of this instrument may be further defined or extended through subordinate instruments or regulations.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Statement of Principles concerning substance use disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 50 of 2026) outline the specific circumstances and factors that must exist for a reasonable hypothesis to be raised connecting substance use disorder with particular kinds of service rendered by a person. Section 7 specifies the definition of 'substance use disorder' and includes relevant International Classification of Diseases codes. Section 9 lists the factors that must be present and related to the service for a reasonable hypothesis to be established, such as the clinical onset of a disorder, the nature of the service, and specific stressors or events experienced during service. These provisions aim to provide clear criteria for claimants and the authorities to determine eligibility for benefits under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. The Statement of Principles imposes several obligations on the parties involved, primarily focusing on claimants and the authorities responsible for assessing and adjudicating claims. Claimants must provide evidence that satisfies the criteria outlined in the Statement of Principles to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting their substance use disorder to their service. The Repatriation Medical Authority and the relevant Commissions, such as the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, must use these principles to assess the claims fairly and accurately. They are required to consider all relevant medical evidence and ensure that their decisions align with the sound medical-scientific evidence provided by the Authority. Furthermore, the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal must review these decisions, ensuring that the principles are applied correctly and that the claimants' rights are protected. The Statement of Principles does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach. However, any failure to comply with the criteria set out in the Statement of Principles could potentially lead to the denial of benefits or compensation for claimants who do not meet the specified conditions. While the Statement of Principles itself does not impose penalties, any procedural errors or misconduct in the handling of claims could be subject to review and potential disciplinary action under the relevant Acts. The focus remains on ensuring that the claims process is conducted in accordance with the established principles and that the benefits are awarded to those who meet the specified criteria.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Offence Provisions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.