Statement of Principles concerning subarachnoid haemorrhage No. 68 of 2010

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2010L02307 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 68 of 2010

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), revokes Instrument No. 40 of 2003, determined under subsection 196B(3) of the VEA concerning subarachnoid haemorrhage and death from subarachnoid haemorrhage.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that on the sound medical-scientific evidence available it is more probable than not that subarachnoid haemorrhage and death from subarachnoid haemorrhage can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(3) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 68 of 2010 concerning subarachnoid haemorrhage.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statement of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 eligible war service (other than operational service) under the VEA;

 defence service (other than hazardous service) under the VEA;

 peacetime service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, subarachnoid haemorrhage or death from subarachnoid haemorrhage is connected with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This new Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 9 January 2008 concerning subarachnoid haemorrhage in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of the new Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instrument.  Comparing the new and the revoked Instruments, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • revising the definition of 'subarachnoid haemorrhage' in clause 3;
  • revising factor 6(a) concerning 'hypertension';
  • revising factor 6(b) concerning 'consuming alcohol for males';
  • revising factor 6(c) concerning 'consuming alcohol for females';
  • revising factor 6(d) concerning 'smoking';
  • revising factor 6(g) concerning 'taking aspirin';
  • revising factor 6(i) concerning 'using a drug from the specified list';
  • revising factor 6(k) concerning 'intracranial dissecting aneurysm';
  • revising factor 6(l) concerning 'intracranial infective vasculitis';
  • revising factor 6(m) concerning 'inflammatory vascular disease';
  • new factor 6(h) concerning 'physical activity';
  • new factor 6(j) concerning 'pregnancy induced hypertension';
  • new factor 6(n) concerning 'statin medication';
  • new factor 6(o) concerning 'moderate to severe cerebral trauma';
  • new definitions of 'a drug from the specified list', 'intracranial infective vasculitis due to a specified infection', 'MET', 'moderate to severe cerebral trauma' and 'pack-year of cigarettes, or the equivalent thereof in other tobacco products' in clause 9;
  • revising definitions of 'ICD-10-AM code', 'relevant service' and 'thrombolytic therapy' in clause 9;
  • deleting definitions of 'cigarettes per day or the equivalent thereof in other tobacco products', 'intracranial mycotic aneurysm' and 'puerperal period'; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to subarachnoid haemorrhage in the Government Notices Gazette of 9 January 2008, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

9.             The determining of this new Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to subarachnoid haemorrhage as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 9 January 2008.

 

10.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

 

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 68 of 2010 amends the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 to establish a new Statement of Principles concerning subarachnoid haemorrhage. This legislative instrument was enacted to address the need for updated medical-scientific evidence regarding the relationship between subarachnoid haemorrhage, death from subarachnoid haemorrhage, and particular kinds of service. The Repatriation Medical Authority, under the authority granted by the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, revoked the previous Instrument No. 40 of 2003 and introduced this new Statement of Principles based on the latest available evidence. The policy objective is to ensure that claims for compensation related to subarachnoid haemorrhage are determined accurately and fairly, reflecting current medical understanding.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 68 of 2010, concerning subarachnoid haemorrhage, applies to eligible veterans and service personnel under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This Act serves to establish the criteria for determining whether a case of subarachnoid haemorrhage or death from such a condition is connected to particular kinds of service, including eligible war service, defence service, and peacetime service. The Authority's determination of these criteria is pivotal in assessing claims for compensation made by affected individuals. The new Instrument replaces the previously revoked Instrument No. 40 of 2003 and has been formulated based on the latest medical-scientific evidence available. The Instrument outlines specific factors that must exist and be related to the service rendered for a claim to be substantiated, such as hypertension, alcohol consumption, smoking, and physical activity, among others. This new Instrument, which has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA, reflects updated definitions and revised factors, thus providing a comprehensive framework for handling claims related to subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Key Provisions

The primary operative sections of the Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 68 of 2010 revolve around the establishment of a new Statement of Principles (section 4) concerning subarachnoid haemorrhage, which replaces the previously revoked Instrument No. 40 of 2003. This new Statement of Principles outlines the specific factors that must be present and related to certain types of military service to establish a connection between subarachnoid haemorrhage or death from subarachnoid haemorrhage and the service circumstances (section 4). The Instrument also specifies the types of service under consideration, including eligible war service, defence service, and peacetime service (section 4). It further delineates the medical and scientific evidence required to substantiate such claims (section 5). The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. Firstly, it mandates that any claim for compensation related to subarachnoid haemorrhage must be substantiated by evidence that aligns with the factors outlined in the Statement of Principles (section 3). These factors include specific conditions related to service, such as hypertension, alcohol consumption, smoking, and other medical conditions (section 6). Additionally, the Authority is required to consider any submissions received during the investigation phase, although in this case, no submissions were received (section 8). Furthermore, the Authority must ensure that the new Instrument is in accordance with the latest revised format and includes updated definitions and factors relevant to the condition in question (section 6). Breaching the requirements set forth in this Instrument can result in various consequences. If a claim for compensation is found to be unsubstantiated or not in compliance with the Statement of Principles, it may be rejected by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission (section 3). Rejected claims may lead to disputes that could be pursued through legal channels, potentially resulting in civil litigation. While the Instrument does not explicitly outline criminal penalties, any fraudulent claims or misrepresentations of facts could potentially lead to criminal charges under other relevant legislation, such as the Crimes Act 1900 (Qld). The maximum penalties for such offences would be determined by the specific laws applicable at the time of the alleged breach.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Offence Provisions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.