Statement of Principles concerning subarachnoid haemorrhage No. 67 of 2010

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2010L02306 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 67 of 2010

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) revokes Instrument No. 39 of 2003, determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning subarachnoid haemorrhage and death from subarachnoid haemorrhage.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that subarachnoid haemorrhage and death from subarachnoid haemorrhage can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 67 of 2010 concerning subarachnoid haemorrhage.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statement of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting subarachnoid haemorrhage or death from subarachnoid haemorrhage, with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This new Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 9 January 2008 concerning subarachnoid haemorrhage in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of the new Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instrument.  Comparing the new and the revoked Instruments, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • revising the definition of 'subarachnoid haemorrhage' in clause 3;
  • revising factor 6(a) concerning 'hypertension';
  • revising factor 6(b) concerning 'consuming alcohol for males';
  • revising factor 6(c) concerning 'consuming alcohol for females';
  • revising factor 6(d) concerning 'oral contraceptive pill';
  • revising factor 6(e) concerning 'smoking';
  • revising factor 6(h) concerning 'taking aspirin';
  • revising factor 6(i) concerning 'physical activity';
  • revising factor 6(j) concerning 'using a drug from the specified list';
  • revising factor 6(l) concerning 'intracranial dissecting aneurysm';
  • revising factor 6(m) concerning 'intracranial infective vasculitis';
  • revising factor 6(n) concerning 'inflammatory vascular disease';
  • new factor 6(k) concerning 'pregnancy induced hypertension';
  • new factor 6(o) concerning 'statin medication';
  • new factor 6(p) concerning 'an acquired haematological disorder';
  • new factor 6(q) concerning 'cerebral trauma';
  • deleting onset factor concerning 'experiencing a severe stressor';
  • new definitions of 'a drug from the specified list', 'an acquired haematological disorder from the specified list', 'cerebral trauma', 'intracranial infective vasculitis due to a specified infection', 'MET' and 'pack-year of cigarettes, or the equivalent thereof in other tobacco products'               in clause 9;
  • revising definitions of 'ICD-10-AM code', 'relevant service' and 'thrombolytic therapy' in clause 9;
  • deleting definitions of 'cigarettes per day or the equivalent thereof in other tobacco products', 'experiencing a severe stressor', 'intracranial mycotic aneurysm', 'puerperal period' and 'strenuous physical activity'; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to subarachnoid haemorrhage in the Government Notices Gazette of 9 January 2008, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

9.             On 3 June 2010, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority. This letter emphasised the deletion of a factor relating to experiencing a severe stressor. The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed Instrument prior to its determination. No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority.

 

10.         The determining of this new Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to subarachnoid haemorrhage as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 9 January 2008.

 

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

 

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 67 of 2010, enacted under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, was introduced to address the issue of subarachnoid haemorrhage and death from subarachnoid haemorrhage in relation to specific kinds of service. This legislative instrument, determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority, replaces the previous Instrument No. 39 of 2003 and is based on sound medical-scientific evidence. The policy objective is to establish a Statement of Principles that sets out the minimum factors that must exist and be related to the service circumstances before a reasonable hypothesis can be raised connecting subarachnoid haemorrhage or death from subarachnoid haemorrhage with service. The Authority conducted an investigation and invited submissions from relevant organisations and individuals, though none were received. The new Instrument revises and updates various factors and definitions related to subarachnoid haemorrhage, clarifying its application under both the Veterans' Entitlements Act and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 67 of 2010, under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA), revokes Instrument No. 39 of 2003 concerning subarachnoid haemorrhage and death from subarachnoid haemorrhage. This new Instrument, which is now in effect, replaces the previous one and provides updated medical-scientific evidence linking subarachnoid haemorrhage to specific kinds of service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, warlike, and non-warlike service. The determination of this Instrument is applicable to claims for compensation for injuries, diseases, or deaths sustained on or after 1 July 2004, as per the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. The new Instrument specifies the factors that must exist to establish a connection between subarachnoid haemorrhage or death from subarachnoid haemorrhage and service, and it includes revisions to definitions and factors such as hypertension, alcohol consumption, smoking, and various medical conditions. The Authority has clarified that the Statement of Principles applies for both the VEA and the MRCA, and the Instrument has been updated to reflect this change. The Authority undertook an investigation into subarachnoid haemorrhage, advertised its intention in the Government Notices Gazette, and provided an opportunity for submissions, though none were received. The new Instrument finalises this investigation and is now in effect as of the specified date.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of this Instrument (No. 67 of 2010) are those that determine the Statement of Principles concerning subarachnoid haemorrhage, which outlines the factors that must exist to link subarachnoid haemorrhage or death from subarachnoid haemorrhage with certain types of service (section 4). These factors must be related to operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, warlike, and non-warlike services as defined under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). The Instrument also includes revised definitions and factors related to subarachnoid haemorrhage, such as hypertension, alcohol consumption, smoking, and other medical conditions (section 6). The Act imposes obligations on the Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) to review and determine Statements of Principles based on sound medical-scientific evidence. This involves conducting investigations, considering submissions from relevant organisations and individuals, and revising definitions and factors as necessary. The Authority must ensure that these Statements of Principles accurately reflect the latest medical-scientific evidence and are applicable to both the VEA and the MRCA (section 2). Any breaches of the obligations imposed by the VEA and the MRCA can lead to civil or criminal consequences. For instance, providing false information or acting in bad faith in the context of compensation claims can result in penalties under the MRCA, including fines and imprisonment. The exact penalties depend on the nature and severity of the breach, but they can include substantial fines and up to two years imprisonment for individuals and higher fines for corporations (MRCA, section 466). Additionally, the Authority has the power to revoke or amend Statements of Principles if new evidence warrants changes, ensuring that the principles remain accurate and relevant.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans’ Law
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Prohibited Conduct

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.