Statement of Principles concerning somatic symptom disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 64 of 2022)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2022L00902 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

SOMATIC SYMPTOM DISORDER

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 64 OF 2022)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning somatic symptom disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 64 of 2022).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 24 of 2014 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2014L00304) determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning somatic symptom disorder.

3.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that somatic symptom disorder and death from somatic symptom disorder can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning somatic symptom disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 64 of 2022).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

4.             The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

5.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting somatic symptom disorder or death from somatic symptom disorder, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

6.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 4 May 2021 concerning somatic symptom disorder in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

7.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2015;
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'somatic symptom disorder' in subsection 7(2);
  • deleting ICD-10-AM code for 'somatic symptom disorder';
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(1)  concerning experiencing severe childhood abuse;
  • new factors in subsections 9(2 ) and 9(4) concerning experiencing a category 1A stressor;
  • new factors in subsections 9(3) and 9(5) concerning experiencing a category 1B stressor;
  • new definitions of 'category 1A stressor', 'category 1B stressor', 'corpse', 'eyewitness', 'DSM-5-TR', 'MRCA' and 'VEA' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • revising the definition of 'relevant service' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary; and
  • deleting the definitions of 'DSM-5'and 'ICD-10-AM code'.

Incorporation

This Instrument incorporates by reference the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR), Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2022.  A copy of this document is available from the offices of the Repatriation Medical Authority, Level 8, 480 Queen St, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, by contacting the Registrar on telephone (07) 3815 9404.

Consultation

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to somatic symptom disorder in the Government Notices Gazette of 4 May 2021, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

Human Rights

9.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

10.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to somatic symptom disorder as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 4 May 2021.

References

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 64 of 2022

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Somatic symptom disorder

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have somatic symptom disorder;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting somatic symptom disorder with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 24 of 2014; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning somatic symptom disorder which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning somatic symptom disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 64 of 2022) was enacted to address the need for updated guidelines regarding the connection between somatic symptom disorder and service rendered by veterans and Defence force members. This legislation was enacted by the Repatriation Medical Authority under subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, with the objective of establishing the minimum factors that must exist to raise a reasonable hypothesis connecting somatic symptom disorder with particular kinds of service. The new Statement of Principles replaces the previous Instrument No. 24 of 2014, reflecting the latest medical-scientific evidence available. The purpose of this legislative instrument is to facilitate the assessment and determination of claims under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, ensuring that eligible persons with somatic symptom disorder receive appropriate medical treatment and compensation. The instrument also promotes various human rights by ensuring reasonable, proportionate, and transparent qualifying conditions for benefits and facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits, compensation, and rehabilitation for veterans and Defence force members.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning somatic symptom disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 64 of 2022) applies to individuals seeking to make claims under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This legislation is relevant to veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependants who are experiencing somatic symptom disorder. It sets out the minimum factors that must exist for a reasonable hypothesis to be raised connecting somatic symptom disorder with particular kinds of service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service under the VEA, and warlike and non-warlike service under the MRCA. The geographic reach of the Act extends to all eligible individuals within Australia and its territories. The Instrument does not specify any exclusions or exemptions but focuses on the sound medical-scientific evidence supporting the connection between somatic symptom disorder and the specified kinds of service. The application of the Act can be further extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, although no such changes have been mentioned in the provided text.

Key Provisions

The main sections of the Statement of Principles concerning somatic symptom disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 64 of 2022) establish the factors that must exist for a reasonable hypothesis to be raised connecting somatic symptom disorder with service rendered by a person under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). These sections outline the specific kinds of service (operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, British nuclear test defence, warlike, and non-warlike service) that must be related to the disorder for a claim to be considered. Section 5 explains that these principles will be used in determining claims under the VEA and MRCA. The determination of these principles is based on sound medical-scientific evidence, as detailed in section 6, and the latest available evidence, including the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR). The Statement of Principles imposes obligations on claimants, the Repatriation Commission, and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission to adhere to the specified factors when assessing and making claims. Claimants must provide evidence that meets the criteria set out in the principles, while the Commissions must apply these principles in their assessments. The principles also facilitate the review process by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, ensuring that decisions are made based on the current sound medical-scientific evidence. There are no specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences outlined for breaches of the Statement of Principles itself. However, failure to provide accurate and complete information as required by the VEA and MRCA may result in penalties under those Acts, such as fines or other legal consequences. Additionally, any fraudulent claims or misrepresentations could lead to criminal charges under relevant legislation. The primary focus of the Statement of Principles is to ensure that claims are assessed fairly and based on sound medical-scientific evidence, thereby protecting the rights of veterans and Defence Force members.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Act
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Repeal & Amendment
Civil Penalty Provisions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.