Statement of Principles concerning shingles and postherpetic neuralgia (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 27 of 2023)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2023L00477 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

SHINGLES AND POSTHERPETIC NEURALGIA

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 27 OF 2023)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning shingles and postherpetic neuralgia (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 27 of 2023).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 47 of 2015 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2015L00253) determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning herpes zoster.

3.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that shingles and postherpetic neuralgia and death from shingles and postherpetic neuralgia can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning shingles and postherpetic neuralgia (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 27 of 2023).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

4.             The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

5.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting shingles and postherpetic neuralgia or death from shingles and postherpetic neuralgia, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

6.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 10 May 2022 concerning herpes zoster in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

7.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2015;
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'shingles and postherpetic neuralgia' in subsection 7(2);
  • including ICD-10-AM codes for 'shingles and postherpetic neuralgia' in subsection 7(3);
  • revising the reference to 'ICD-10-AM code' in subsection 7(4);
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(1) concerning having chickenpox;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(2) concerning for vaccine strain herpes zoster only, having live attenuated varicella vaccine before the clinical onset of shingles;
  • new factor in subsection 9(3) concerning being prevented from accessing appropriate varicella-zoster vaccination;
  • new factors in subsections 9(4) and 9(13) concerning being in an immunocompromised state;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(5) concerning having trauma;
  • revising the factors in subsections 9(6) and 9(14) concerning having diabetes mellitus;
  • new factor in subsection 9(7) concerning having an autoimmune disease;
  • new factor in subsection 9(8) concerning having a depressive disorder;
  • new factor in subsection 9(9) concerning having a chronic medical condition from the specified list of chronic medical conditions;
  • new factor in subsection 9(10) concerning having a moderate to severe traumatic brain injury;
  • new factor in subsection 9(11) concerning having a splenectomy;
  • new factor in subsection 9(12) concerning having an active symptomatic infection resulting in SARS-CoV-2;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(15) concerning inability to obtain appropriate clinical management;
  • new definitions of active symptomatic infection resulting in SARS-CoV-2, persistent asthma of moderate severity, specified list of autoimmune diseases, specified list of chronic medical conditions.  in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • revising the definitions of chronic renal failure, immunocompromised state as specified,  in Schedule 1  Dictionary.

 

Consultation

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to herpes zoster in the Government Notices Gazette of 10 May 2022, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

Human Rights

9.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

10.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to shingles and postherpetic neuralgia as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 10 May 2022.

References

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 27 of 2023

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Shingles and postherpetic neuralgia

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have shingles and postherpetic neuralgia;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting shingles and postherpetic neuralgia with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 47 of 2015; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning shingles and postherpetic neuralgia which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning Shingles and Postherpetic Neuralgia (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 27 of 2023) was enacted to address the medical-scientific evidence linking shingles and postherpetic neuralgia to specific types of service under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This legislative instrument, determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA, replaces the previously repealed Instrument No. 47 of 2023, which concerned herpes zoster. The Authority established this statement to provide a framework for assessing claims related to shingles and postherpetic neuralgia, ensuring that the conditions under which such claims can be considered are based on sound medical-scientific evidence. This instrument facilitates the process for claimants and the authorities involved in assessing these claims, while also outlining the necessary factors that must be present to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting the conditions with the service rendered. The policy objective of this legislative instrument is to ensure that the assessment and determination of benefits for veterans and Defence Force members suffering from shingles and postherpetic neuralgia are transparent, proportionate, and reasonable, thereby promoting human rights such as the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. The Authority's determination is compatible with human rights as it neither derogates from any human rights nor discriminates against any individual based on various factors. This instrument represents a technical improvement in the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning shingles and postherpetic neuralgia (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 27 of 2023) applies to individuals claiming under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. It outlines the minimum factors required to establish a reasonable hypothesis that shingles, postherpetic neuralgia, or death from these conditions are related to specific types of service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, British nuclear test defence, warlike, and non-warlike service. This Statement of Principles replaces the previously repealed Instrument No. 47 of 2015, reflecting updated medical-scientific evidence. The geographical and jurisdictional reach of this Act is national, impacting veterans and service personnel across Australia. The Act does not specify exclusions or exemptions, but it is designed to ensure that claims are assessed based on the latest available medical-scientific evidence. The application of this Act may be further extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, which are not detailed in the provided text.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning shingles and postherpetic neuralgia (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 27 of 2023) is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and applies to both the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). The Statement outlines the minimum factors that must exist to raise a reasonable hypothesis that shingles and postherpetic neuralgia, or death from these conditions, are related to specific kinds of service rendered by a person, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service under the VEA, and warlike and non-warlike service under the MRCA (sections 5 and 6). This Statement replaces the previously repealed Instrument No. 47 of 2015 and incorporates the latest medical-scientific evidence available to the Repatriation Medical Authority (section 2). The Statement of Principles imposes certain obligations on the parties and entities it governs. Claimants must demonstrate that the minimum factors specified in the Statement exist and are related to their service to be eligible for claims under the VEA and MRCA. The Repatriation Commission and Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission are required to assess these claims based on the evidence provided and the criteria outlined in the Statement. The Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal are tasked with reviewing decisions made by these Commissions. The Authority must ensure that the Statement reflects the most current sound medical-scientific evidence and that it is compatible with human rights as stipulated in the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 (section 9). Failure to comply with the provisions of this Statement of Principles may lead to adverse outcomes for claimants. If claimants fail to provide sufficient evidence to meet the criteria outlined in the Statement, their claims may be denied. Similarly, if the Repatriation Commission or Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission does not adhere to the assessment criteria, their decisions may be subject to review and potential reversal by the Veterans' Review Board or the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. Non-compliance with the human rights provisions may result in legal challenges and the need for the Authority to revise the Statement to ensure compatibility with human rights. The Statement of Principles does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or consequences for breach. However, the failure to comply with the requirements of the VEA or MRCA, as assessed against the criteria in this Statement, may lead to the denial of claims and associated entitlements. Additionally, if the Authority fails to ensure that the Statement is compatible with human rights, it may face scrutiny and potential legal action. The maximum penalties for breaches of the VEA and MRCA are determined by the respective Acts and can include fines and other sanctions as prescribed by law.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Human Rights Law

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.