Statement of Principles concerning shin splints No. 49 of 2006

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2006L02767 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

Statement of Principles

concerning

SHIN SPLINTS

Instrument No. 49 of 2006 as amended

made under section 196B(2) of the

Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986

This compilation was prepared on 21 September 2007 taking into account Amendment of Statement of Principles concerning SHIN SPLINTS (Instrument No. 105 of 2007).

Prepared by the Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat, Brisbane.

 

 

Statement of Principles

concerning

 

SHIN SPLINTS

No. 49 of 2006

 

for the purposes of the

 

Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986

and

Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004

 

Title

  1. This Instrument may be cited as Statement of Principles concerning shin splints No. 49 of 2006.

 

Determination

2.                  This Statement of Principles is determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority under subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA).

 

Kind of injury, disease or death

3. (a) This Statement of Principles is about shin splints and death from shin splints.

(b)              For the purposes of this Statement of Principles, "shin splints" means medial tibial stress syndrome and chronic exertional compartment syndrome of the lower leg.  Medial tibial stress syndrome is characterised by exercise-induced pain along the posteromedial aspect of the distal two-thirds of the tibia.  Chronic exertional compartment syndrome of the lower leg is characterised by exercise-induced pain and tightness originating in the calf or shin due to raised intracompartmental pressure.  The pain of both conditions typically resolves or reduces with rest but may recur with exercise.  This definition excludes fracture, stress fracture, bursitis, infections, tumours, vascular insufficiency, entrapment of nerves or arteries, acute strains and acute sprains.

 

Basis for determining the factors

4. The Repatriation Medical Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that shin splints and death from shin splints can be related to relevant service rendered by veterans, members of Peacekeeping Forces, or members of the Forces under the VEA, or members under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

 

Factors that must be related to service

5. Subject to clause 7, at least one of the factors set out in clause 6 must be related to the relevant service rendered by the person.

 

Factors

6. The factor that must as a minimum exist before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting shin splints or death from shin splints with the circumstances of a person’s relevant service is:

 

(a)          having a sudden increase in the frequency, duration, or intensity of weight bearing exercise involving the affected lower limb, at the time of the clinical onset of shin splints; or

 

(b)          undertaking weight bearing exercise involving the affected lower limb at a rate greater than six METs for at least one hour per day on more days than not over a period of at least the three months, before the clinical onset of shin splints; or

 

(c)          for medial tibial stress syndrome only, having an injury that has resulted in excess pronation of the foot of the affected limb before the clinical onset of shin splints; or

 

(d)          having a sudden increase in the frequency, duration, or intensity of weight bearing exercise involving the affected lower limb, at the time of the clinical worsening of shin splints; or

 

(e)          undertaking weight bearing exercise involving the affected lower limb at a rate greater than six METs for at least one hour per day on more days than not over a period of at least the three months, before the clinical worsening of shin splints; or

 

(f)           for medial tibial stress syndrome only, having an injury that has resulted in excess pronation of the foot of the affected limb before the clinical worsening of shin splints; or;

 

(g)          inability to obtain appropriate clinical management for shin splints.

 

Factors that apply only to material contribution or aggravation

7. Paragraphs 6(d) to 6(g) apply only to material contribution to, or aggravation of, shin splints where the person’s shin splints were suffered or contracted before or during (but not arising out of) the person’s relevant service.

 

Inclusion of Statements of Principles

8. In this Statement of Principles if a relevant factor applies and that factor includes an injury or disease in respect of which there is a Statement of Principles then the factors in that last mentioned Statement of Principles apply in accordance with the terms of that Statement of Principles as in force from time to time.

 

Other definitions

9.                  For the purposes of this Statement of Principles:

 

"death from shin splints" in relation to a person includes death from a terminal event or condition that was contributed to by the person’s shin splints;

 

"excess pronation of the foot" means a positional deformity of the foot such that there is excessive dorsiflexion, eversion and abduction (inward roll) of the foot when the foot is in a fixed position or in dynamic motion;

 

"MET" means a unit of measurement of the level of physical exertion.  1 MET = 3.5 ml of oxygen/kg of body weight per minute or, 1.0 kcal/kg of body weight per hour, or resting metabolic rate;

 

"relevant service" means:

(a)               operational service under the VEA;

(b)               peacekeeping service under the VEA;

(c)               hazardous service under the VEA;

(d)               warlike service under the MRCA; or

(e)               non-warlike service under the MRCA;

 

"terminal event" means the proximate or ultimate cause of death and includes:

(a)              pneumonia;

(b)              respiratory failure;

(c)              cardiac arrest;

(d)              circulatory failure; or

(e)              cessation of brain function.

 

Date of effect

10. This Instrument takes effect from 30 August 2006.


Notes to Statement of Principles concerning shin splints (Instrument No. 49 of 2006)

The Statement of Principles concerning shin splints (Instrument No. 49 of 2006) in force under section 196B(2) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, as shown in this compilation is amended as indicated in the Tables below.

Table of Instruments

Title

Date of notification
in Gazette or FRLI registration

Date of
commencement

Application, saving or
transitional provisions

Statement of Principles concerning shin splints (Instrument No. 49 of 2006)

23 August 2006

 

30 August 2006

 

Amendment of Statement of Principles concerning shin splints (Instrument No. 105 of 2007)

13 September 2007

 

19 September 2007

 

 

Table of Amendments

ad. = added or inserted      am. = amended      rep. = repealed      rs. = repealed and substituted

Provision affected

How affected

Clause 6 – paras (d), (e) & (f) 

ad. Instrument  No.105 of 2007

 

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning Shin Splints (Instrument No. 49 of 2006), as amended, was enacted under the authority of section 196B(2) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986. This legislative instrument aims to address the problem of establishing a causal link between service-related factors and shin splints, a common injury among veterans, members of Peacekeeping Forces, and members of the Australian Defence Force. The Repatriation Medical Authority, acting on sound medical-scientific evidence, determined that shin splints can be related to relevant service, thus necessitating these principles to guide the assessment of claims related to this condition. The primary policy objective is to provide a clear framework for determining the eligibility of veterans and military personnel for compensation or rehabilitation benefits in cases where shin splints are connected to their service. This Statement of Principles applies to medial tibial stress syndrome and chronic exertional compartment syndrome of the lower leg, excluding other conditions such as fractures, stress fractures, and infections. It specifies factors that must be related to service to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting shin splints with the circumstances of a person's service. The instrument became effective on 30 August 2006, and an amendment was made in 2007 to further refine the criteria. This legal framework ensures that veterans and military personnel can seek appropriate compensation or rehabilitation for service-related shin splints.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning shin splints No. 49 of 2006, which applies under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, is a legislative instrument determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority. It addresses the medical condition of shin splints, specifically medial tibial stress syndrome and chronic exertional compartment syndrome of the lower leg, and their relation to service rendered by veterans, members of peacekeeping forces, or members of the Australian Defence Force. The Statement of Principles identifies circumstances under which a connection between shin splints and relevant service can be established, including a sudden increase in the frequency, duration, or intensity of weight-bearing exercise, or undertaking such exercise at a rate greater than six metabolic equivalents (METs) for extended periods. The instrument also includes provisions for material contribution to or aggravation of shin splints where the condition was already present before or during service. The scope of the Statement of Principles is limited to cases where the specified factors are related to the individual's relevant service and does not cover conditions explicitly excluded such as fractures or infections. This legislative instrument commenced on 30 August 2006 and was later amended by Instrument No. 105 of 2007, which introduced additional provisions concerning material contribution or aggravation of shin splints.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning Shin Splints No. 49 of 2006 (Instrument No. 49 of 2006) under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 primarily deals with the recognition of shin splints, specifically medial tibial stress syndrome and chronic exertional compartment syndrome of the lower leg, as conditions potentially related to relevant service. Clause 3(b) provides the definition of shin splints, excluding other conditions like fractures or stress fractures. The Statement of Principles aims to establish a connection between these conditions and the service rendered by veterans, members of Peacekeeping Forces, or members of the Forces. The key factors that must be related to the service to raise a reasonable hypothesis of a connection are detailed in Clause 6, which includes sudden increases in exercise intensity or duration, specific rates of exercise, injuries leading to foot pronation, and failure to obtain appropriate clinical management. The Statement of Principles imposes several obligations on the parties it governs. Firstly, it mandates that at least one of the factors outlined in Clause 6 must be related to the relevant service rendered by the person for the condition to be considered connected to service. These factors include specific instances of exercise intensity or duration and injuries leading to foot pronation. Clause 7 specifies that certain factors apply only to material contribution to, or aggravation of, shin splints if the condition was already present before or during service. Additionally, Clause 8 mandates that if a relevant factor includes an injury or disease with an existing Statement of Principles, the factors in that Statement must also apply. This ensures consistency and comprehensiveness in the application of the principles. Regarding consequences for breach, the Statement of Principles itself does not explicitly outline offences or penalties. However, the Repatriation Medical Authority, which determines these principles under section 196B(2) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, would handle any non-compliance or misuse of the principles. Any legal breaches or fraudulent claims concerning veterans' entitlements could potentially lead to civil or criminal penalties under the relevant Acts. The maximum penalties would depend on the specific nature of the breach, such as providing false information, which could result in fines or imprisonment as per the legal framework governing veterans' entitlements and rehabilitation compensation.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.