Statement of Principles concerning seizure (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 37 of 2022)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2022L00651 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

SEIZURE

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 37 OF 2022)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning seizure (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 37 of 2022).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 77 of 2013 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2013L01897) determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning epileptic seizure.

3.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that seizure and death from seizure can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning seizure (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 37 of 2022).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

4.             The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

5.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting seizure or death from seizure, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

6.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 9 March 2021 concerning epileptic seizure in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

7.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2015;
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the name of the condition from 'epileptic seizure' to 'seizure';
  • new definition of 'seizure' in subsection 7(2);
  • new factor in subsection 9(3) concerning having an electrical injury of the brain, for clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(4) concerning having a surgical procedure which involves a craniotomy or cranioplasty, for clinical onset only;
  • new factor in subsection 9(5) concerning having cardiac surgery or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, for clinical onset only;
  • new factor in subsection 9(6) concerning having brain radiotherapy, for clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(7) concerning having an hypoxic cerebral insult, for clinical onset only, by the inclusion of a note;
  • new factor in subsection 9(8) concerning having a central nervous system vascular lesion, for clinical onset only;
  • new factor in subsection 9(9) concerning having autoimmune encephalitis, for clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(11) concerning having infection with human immunodeficiency virus, for clinical onset only;
  • new factor in subsection 9(12) concerning having septicaemia, for clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(13) concerning having an intracranial space-occupying lesion, for clinical onset only, by the inclusion of a note;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(14) concerning having dementia as specified, for clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(15) concerning having a medical condition affecting the brain, for clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(16) concerning having alcohol intoxication, alcohol withdrawal or moderate to severe alcohol use disorder, for clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(17) concerning having malignant hypertension or hypertensive encephalopathy, for clinical onset only;
  • new factor in subsection 9(18) concerning having eclampsia, now included as a separate factor, for clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(20) concerning having acute renal failure or chronic renal failure, for clinical onset only;
  • new factor in subsection 9(21) concerning having an amniotic fluid embolism or fat embolism, for clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(22) concerning having hypoglycaemia, for clinical onset only, by the inclusion of a note;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(23) concerning having hyperglycaemia, for clinical onset only;
  • new factor in subsection 9(24) concerning having diabetes mellitus, for clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(25) concerning having an electrolyte abnormality, for clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(26) concerning having carbon monoxide poisoning, for clinical onset only;
  • new factor in subsection 9(27) concerning having sleep deprivation, for clinical onset only;
  • new factor in subsection 9(28) concerning having exertional heat stroke, for clinical onset only;
  • new factor in subsection 9(29) concerning being dehydrated, for clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(30) concerning undergoing organ or tissue transplantation, excluding corneal transplant, for clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(31) concerning taking a drug, for clinical onset only;
  • new factor in subsection 9(33) concerning being exposed to radiographic contrast media, for clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(34) concerning reducing the intake of, or withdrawing from, a chronically administered sedative drug, for clinical onset only, by the inclusion of a note;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(35) concerning being exposed to partial pressures of oxygen above 1.2 atmospheres absolute (120 kPa), for clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(36) concerning being exposed to an abrupt reduction in the pressure of the air surrounding the person, for clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(37) concerning being poisoned with a metal, for clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(38) concerning inhaling, ingesting or having cutaneous contact with a neurotoxic substance or a food or compound containing a neurotoxic substance, for clinical onset only;
  • deleting the factor concerning having a cerebrovascular accident or subarachnoid haemorrhage, for clinical onset only, as this is now covered by the factor in subsection 9(8) concerning having a central nervous system vascular lesion, for clinical onset only;
  • deleting the factors concerning having central nervous system systemic lupus erythematosus and having an autoimmune disorder affecting the brain, for clinical onset only, as these are now covered by the factor in subsection 9(9) concerning having autoimmune encephalitis, for clinical onset only;
  • deleting the factor concerning undergoing renal dialysis, for clinical onset only, as this is now covered by the factor in subsection 9(20) concerning having acute renal failure or chronic renal failure, for clinical onset only;
  • deleting the factor concerning experiencing a specified physical stimulus, for clinical onset only, as this is now covered by the factors in:
  • subsection 9(27) concerning having sleep deprivation, for clinical onset only; and
  • subsection 9(28) concerning having exertional heat stroke, for clinical onset only; and
  • subsection 9(29) concerning being dehydrated, for clinical onset only;
  • new definitions of 'autoimmune encephalitis', 'chronic renal failure', 'dementia as specified', 'electrolyte abnormality', 'hyperglycaemia', 'hypoglycaemia', 'inhalants', 'iron overload', 'MRCA', 'organ or tissue transplantation', 'organic solvents', 'specified list of central nervous system vascular lesions', 'specified list of medical conditions', 'specified list of metals' and 'VEA' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • revising the definitions of 'intracranial space-occupying lesion', 'neurotoxic substance or a food or compound containing a neurotoxic substance', 'relevant service' and 'signs and symptoms of poisoning' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • new table of specified drugs in Schedule 2 - Drugs; and
  • deleting the definitions of 'a drug from Specified List 1', 'a drug or a drug from a class of drugs from the specified list', 'a medical condition from the specified list', 'a specified metal', 'a specified physical stimulus', 'an autoimmune disorder affecting the brain', 'an electrolyte imbalance', 'an inhalant', 'dementia', 'RDX' and 'status epilepticus'.

Consultation

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to epileptic seizure in the Government Notices Gazette of 9 March 2021, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

Human Rights

9.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

10.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to epileptic seizure as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 9 March 2021.

References

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 37 of 2022

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Seizure

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have seizure;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting seizure with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 77 of 2013; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning seizure which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning seizure (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 37 of 2022) is an instrument determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). It was introduced to address the need for an updated and more comprehensive framework regarding the connection between seizures and various kinds of service rendered by individuals, replacing the previous Instrument No. 77 of 2013. This instrument specifies the minimum factors that must exist to raise a reasonable hypothesis linking seizures or death from seizures with service conditions, thereby facilitating claims and assessments under the VEA and MRCA. The determination follows an investigation and considers the latest sound medical-scientific evidence available, aiming to improve the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under these Acts. The Authority ensured that this instrument is compatible with human rights, promoting the rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents by facilitating the assessment and determination of benefits and compensation.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning seizure (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 37 of 2022) applies to persons who have experienced a seizure and are seeking benefits under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 or the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This Statement of Principles outlines the minimum factors that must exist to establish a reasonable hypothesis that the seizure was related to specific types of service rendered, such as operational service, peacekeeping service, hazardous service, British nuclear test defence service, warlike service, or non-warlike service. The legislation serves to guide claimants and the responsible Commissions in assessing claims and to facilitate the review of these decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. The principles are determined based on the available sound medical-scientific evidence and are applicable on a national level. This legislative instrument does not introduce any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds but rather refines the criteria for establishing a connection between service and the occurrence of seizures. The application and scope of this Act may be further defined or extended through subordinate instruments, which are not detailed in the provided text.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning seizure (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 37 of 2022) (the Instrument) serves as a key document under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). It outlines the minimum factors that must be present to establish a reasonable hypothesis that a veteran's seizure is related to their service (subsections 7(2) and 9(1) to 9(38)). These factors cover a range of medical conditions and exposures that could be related to service, including electrical injuries of the brain, surgical procedures involving a craniotomy or cranioplasty, and various medical conditions such as autoimmune encephalitis and diabetes mellitus (subsection 9). The Instrument also introduces new definitions and factors that reflect the latest medical-scientific evidence, replacing the previous Instrument No. 77 of 2013. The Instrument imposes specific obligations on claimants, the Repatriation Commission, and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission. Claimants must demonstrate that the specified factors are related to their service to establish a reasonable hypothesis of a service connection (subsection 9). The Commissions are required to assess claims based on the criteria and factors outlined in the Instrument, ensuring that decisions are made in accordance with the latest medical-scientific evidence (subsections 196B and 196C of the VEA). Additionally, the Instrument facilitates the review of decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. Breaching the requirements set out in the Instrument may lead to civil consequences for claimants, such as the denial of compensation or medical treatment if the specified factors are not met. The Instrument does not explicitly outline criminal penalties for breach; however, any fraudulent claims or misrepresentations in relation to service-connected conditions could potentially lead to criminal charges under broader legislative provisions concerning fraud and false statements. The maximum penalties for such offences can vary but may include substantial fines and imprisonment, depending on the severity and intent of the offence.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Human Rights Law

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.