Statement of Principles concerning seborrhoeic dermatitis No. 13 of 2013

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2013L00405 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 13 of 2013

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), revokes Instrument No. 21 of 2005, determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning seborrhoeic dermatitis.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that seborrhoeic dermatitis and death from seborrhoeic dermatitis can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 13 of 2013 concerning seborrhoeic dermatitis.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statement of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting seborrhoeic dermatitis or death from seborrhoeic dermatitis, with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 3 November 2010 concerning seborrhoeic dermatitis in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the revoked Instrument, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • revising factors 6(a) & 6(f) concerning 'human immunodeficiency virus';
  • revising factors 6(b) & 6(g) concerning 'Parkinson’s disease or parkinsonism';
  • new factors 6(d) & 6(i) concerning 'solid organ transplant';
  • new factors 6(e) & 6(j) concerning 'being treated with erlotinib or interferon alpha';
  • revising the definitions of 'a psychiatric disease from the specified list', 'ICD-10-AM code' and 'relevant service' in clause 9;
  • deleting the definition of 'being infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)'; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to seborrhoeic dermatitis in the Government Notices Gazette of 3 November 2010, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

9.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

 

10.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to seborrhoeic dermatitis as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 3 November 2010.

 

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

 

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 13 of 2013

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Seborrhoeic dermatitis

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have seborrhoeic dermatitis;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting seborrhoeic dermatitis with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 4 of the Explanatory Notes;
  • replaces Instrument No. 21 of 2005; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning seborrhoeic dermatitis which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICSECR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICSECR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members; and
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 13 of 2013 was enacted to address the gap in the provision of medical treatment and compensation for veterans and current or former Defence Force members suffering from seborrhoeic dermatitis. This instrument revokes the previous Instrument No. 21 of 2005 and replaces it with a revised Statement of Principles, providing updated information based on the latest sound medical-scientific evidence. The Repatriation Medical Authority, under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA), determined this instrument to facilitate claims for compensation and medical treatment for eligible individuals who have contracted seborrhoeic dermatitis. This instrument outlines the minimum factors that must exist to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting the condition with particular kinds of service and reflects the commencement of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This instrument is compatible with human rights, as it does not derogate from any rights and promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 13 of 2013, concerning seborrhoeic dermatitis, applies to veterans and members of the Defence Force, as well as their dependents, who may be seeking compensation or medical treatment for conditions related to their service. This instrument facilitates the assessment and determination of such claims under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. It specifies the minimum factors that must exist for a reasonable hypothesis to connect seborrhoeic dermatitis with the service rendered by an individual. The instrument replaces the previous Instrument No. 21 of 2005 and incorporates the latest medical-scientific evidence. The instrument has a national jurisdictional reach in Australia and applies to all states and territories. It does not include specific exclusions or exemptions but rather focuses on the qualifying conditions for benefits. The Authority may extend or restrict the application of this instrument through subordinate instruments, ensuring that it remains aligned with the latest medical-scientific evidence and legislative requirements.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of this instrument (Instrument No. 13 of 2013) determine a Statement of Principles concerning seborrhoeic dermatitis, replacing the previously revoked Instrument No. 21 of 2005 (subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, VEA). This new instrument establishes the circumstances under which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons with seborrhoeic dermatitis, clarifying the factors that must exist to link the condition with particular kinds of service, such as operational, peacekeeping, or hazardous service. The instrument also specifies the conditions under which claims for compensation under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA) can be assessed (subsection 196B(2) of the VEA). The obligations imposed by this instrument on the parties or entities it governs primarily concern the Repatriation Medical Authority, which is tasked with determining the Statement of Principles. The Authority must ensure that the factors outlined in the instrument are considered in the assessment of claims related to seborrhoeic dermatitis. Additionally, the Authority must ensure that its determinations are compatible with human rights and freedoms as recognised or declared in international instruments. The instrument also requires the Authority to facilitate the review of its decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. There are no specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach outlined in this instrument. However, the Authority is required to comply with the provisions of the VEA and the MRCA in making its determinations, and failure to do so could result in legal challenges or administrative reviews. The instrument ensures that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent, thereby promoting the human rights of veterans and their dependents. The compatibility with human rights is affirmed in the Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights, which follows the instrument.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.