Statement of Principles concerning rotator cuff syndrome No. 40 of 2006

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2006L02756 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

 

 

 

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES NO. 40 of 2006

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (‘the Authority’), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (‘the VEA’) revokes Instrument No. 84 of 1997 of 8 October 1997 determined under subsection 196B(3) of the VEA concerning rotator cuff syndrome and death from rotator cuff syndrome.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that on the sound medical-scientific evidence available it is more probable than not that rotator cuff syndrome and death from rotator cuff syndrome can be related to particular kinds of service. The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(3) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 40 of 2006 concerning rotator cuff syndrome. This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statements of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (‘the MRCA’) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 eligible war service (other than operational service) under the VEA;

 defence service (other than hazardous service) under the VEA;

 peacetime service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, rotator cuff syndrome or death from rotator cuff syndrome is connected with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This new instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 19 November 2003 concerning rotator cuff syndrome in accordance with section 196G of the Act. The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of the new Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instruments.  Comparing the new and the revoked Instruments, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
  • revising the definition for ‘rotator cuff syndrome’ in clause 3;
  • rewording factors 6(a) & 6(j) relating to ‘injury’;
  • rewording factors 6(b) & 6(k) relating to ‘repetitive or sustained activities’;
  • rewording factors 6(c) & 6(l) relating to ‘dialysis’;
  • rewording factors 6(d) & 6(m) relating to ‘using the upper limbs for transfer’;
  • rewording factors 6(e) & 6(n) relating to ‘anatomical narrowing’;
  • rewording factors 6(f) & 6(o) relating to ‘excess laxity’;
  • new factors 6(g) & 6(p) relating to ‘infection’;
  • new factors 6(h) & 6(q) relating to ‘rheumatoid arthritis’;
  • new factors 6(i) & 6(r) relating to ‘gout’;
  • revising the definitions for ‘anatomical narrowing of the subacromial space’; ‘excess laxity of the shoulder’; and ‘relevant service’ in clause 9;
  • including new definitions for ‘an injury to the affected shoulder’; ‘death from rotator cuff syndrome’; ‘dialysis-related amyloidosis’; ‘ ICD10-AM code’; and ‘terminal event’ in clause 9;
  • deleting definitions for ‘haemodialysis treatment’; and ‘trauma to the shoulder’ and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to rotator cuff syndrome in the Government Notices Gazettes of 19 November 2003, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants. The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field. Three submissions were received for consideration by the Authority.

 

9.             Following the commencement of the MRCA, the Authority published a “Further Notice of Investigations” in the Government Notices Gazette of 14 July 2004, extending the closing date for submissions in relation to the above mentioned investigation until 10 September 2004. The Authority again invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA (who include persons eligible to make a claim under the MRCA), as well as the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission and any person having expertise in the field.

 

10.         The determining of this new instrument finalises the investigation in relation to rotator cuff syndrome as advertised in the Government Notices Gazettes of 19 November 2003.

 

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available, on written request, from the Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat.

Overview

The Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 were enacted to address the need for comprehensive medical and compensation services for Australian Defence Force members and veterans. The Repatriation Medical Authority, under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, revoked Instrument No. 84 of 1997 concerning rotator cuff syndrome and death from the condition. This action was taken due to the evolving understanding of the medical-scientific evidence linking rotator cuff syndrome to specific types of military service. The Authority has subsequently determined a new Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 40 of 2006, concerning rotator cuff syndrome, which replaces the revoked statements and outlines the factors necessary to establish a connection between the condition and service rendered. This new instrument was developed following an investigation into the condition, with submissions invited from relevant organisations and experts. The new instrument reflects updated definitions and revised factors to better align with current medical understanding and the legal framework established by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Statement of Principles No. 40 of 2006, concerning rotator cuff syndrome, applies to veterans and service personnel who may have sustained or contracted this condition during their service under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 or the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This instrument pertains to claims for compensation related to rotator cuff syndrome or death from the condition arising from eligible war service, defence service, and peacetime service as defined in the respective Acts. The Authority has determined that rotator cuff syndrome and death from the condition can be connected to particular kinds of service, as outlined in the Statement of Principles, thus replacing the previous Instrument No. 84 of 1997. The geographic reach of this instrument is national, as it applies to all veterans and service personnel in Australia who meet the specified service criteria. The Authority’s decision to determine this Statement of Principles follows an investigation that involved reviewing sound medical-scientific evidence and considering submissions from relevant organisations and experts.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Repatriation Medical Authority Statement of Principles No. 40 of 2006 (the ‘Instrument’) are found in subsections 196B(3) and 196B(3A) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA). These sections provide the legal basis for the Authority to determine Statements of Principles concerning the connection between certain medical conditions and particular kinds of service, such as rotator cuff syndrome in this case. The Instrument lists the factors that must exist for a claim of connection to be accepted, specifying the types of service and the medical condition in question. This includes setting out the kinds of service (eligible war service, defence service, peacetime service) that must be linked to the condition for a claim to be considered valid. The obligations imposed by this Instrument on the parties it governs include the requirement for claimants to provide evidence that the factors listed in the Instrument are met. Specifically, claimants must demonstrate that their rotator cuff syndrome or death from the condition is related to the service rendered under the specified circumstances. This involves proving a connection between their service and the condition in question, with reference to the medical and scientific evidence available to the Authority. The Authority is also obligated to review all submissions and evidence provided by claimants, and to make a determination based on the balance of probabilities. Breach of the obligations imposed by this Instrument may lead to civil or criminal consequences. Although the Instrument itself does not specify penalties for non-compliance, claimants who fail to provide the necessary evidence or who provide false information may face consequences under the VEA or the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). Under these Acts, providing false information can be considered an offence, potentially leading to fines or other penalties as prescribed by law. Additionally, claimants who do not adhere to the requirements of the Instrument may have their claims for compensation rejected, which can have significant personal and financial repercussions.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans’ Law
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Licensing & Registration
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.