REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY
INSTRUMENT NO. 20 of 2011
VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986
MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004
EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING
- The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), revokes Instrument No. 94 of 1995, determined under subsection 196B(3) of the VEA concerning rheumatic heart disease.
2. The Authority is of the view that on the sound medical-scientific evidence available it is more probable than not that rheumatic heart disease and death from rheumatic heart disease can be related to particular kinds of service. The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(3) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 20 of 2011 concerning rheumatic heart disease. This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statement of Principles.
3. The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004. Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.
4. The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:
eligible war service (other than operational service) under the VEA;
defence service (other than hazardous service) under the VEA;
peacetime service under the MRCA,
before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, rheumatic heart disease or death from rheumatic heart disease is connected with the circumstances of that service.
5. This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 2 May 2007 concerning rheumatic heart disease in accordance with section 196G of the VEA. The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.
6. The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instrument. Comparing this Instrument and the revoked Instrument, the differences include:
- adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
- deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
- revising the definition of 'rheumatic heart disease' in clause 3;
- revising factor 6(a) concerning 'acute rheumatic fever';
- revising factor 6(b) concerning 'group A beta-haemolytic streptococcal A infection';
- new factor 6(c) concerning 'acute rheumatic fever';
- new factor 6(d) concerning 'group A beta-haemolytic streptococcal A infection';
- new factor 6(e) concerning 'being pregnant';
- new definitions of 'death from rheumatic heart disease', 'group A beta-haemolytic streptococcal infection', 'ICD-10-AM code', 'relevant service' and 'terminal event' in clause 9;
- deleting definitions of 'ICD code', 'rheumatic fever' and 'streptococcal A infection'; and
- specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.
7. Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.
8. Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to rheumatic heart disease in the Government Notices Gazette of 2 May 2007, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants. The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field. No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.
9. The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to rheumatic heart disease as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 2 May 2007.
10. A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA. Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:
The Registrar
Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat
GPO Box 1014
BRISBANE QLD 4001
Overview
The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 20 of 2011, issued under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, addresses the issue of rheumatic heart disease among veterans. This instrument revokes Instrument No. 94 of 1995 and establishes a new Statement of Principles concerning rheumatic heart disease, reflecting updated medical-scientific evidence. The Authority determined that it is more probable than not that rheumatic heart disease and death from this condition can be related to certain kinds of service, leading to the creation of this new instrument to clarify the factors and service conditions that must be met for a connection to be established between rheumatic heart disease and service. This legislative instrument was enacted by the Repatriation Medical Authority and aims to ensure that claims for compensation are assessed accurately and fairly in accordance with the latest available evidence.
Scope and Application
The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 20 of 2011 under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 addresses the medical conditions related to rheumatic heart disease and death from rheumatic heart disease for persons who have rendered eligible war service, defence service, or peacetime service. This Instrument revokes the previous Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 94 of 1995, and provides a new set of criteria that must be met for these conditions to be considered related to service, thereby impacting eligibility for compensation claims. The Instrument applies to claims for compensation that commenced on or after 1 July 2004, and the determinations are made by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in accordance with Statements of Principles issued by the Authority. This legislative instrument clarifies the medical and service-related criteria, thereby governing the assessment and approval of compensation claims for veterans and service personnel affected by rheumatic heart disease.
Key Provisions
The Repatriation Medical Authority, under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA), has revoked Instrument No. 94 of 1995 concerning rheumatic heart disease and determined a new Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 20 of 2011, based on available medical-scientific evidence (subsection 196B(8) and (3) of the VEA). This new instrument specifies the conditions under which rheumatic heart disease and death from rheumatic heart disease can be related to particular kinds of service. The new instrument also replaces the revoked instrument and will be used to determine claims for compensation under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA) for injuries or diseases sustained on or after 1 July 2004 (section 319 of the MRCA).
The Statement of Principles outlines the specific factors that must be present, and how they must relate to the service rendered, before it can be concluded that rheumatic heart disease or death from rheumatic heart disease is connected to the service. This applies to eligible war service, defence service, and peacetime service as defined in the VEA and MRCA. The new instrument also reflects the latest revised format and includes revised definitions and factors related to rheumatic heart disease, acute rheumatic fever, group A beta-haemolytic streptococcal infection, and pregnancy. Additionally, it clarifies that the Statement of Principles is determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA (subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA).
Before determining the new Statement of Principles, the Authority advertised its intention to investigate rheumatic heart disease and invited submissions from relevant organisations and individuals. However, no submissions were received for consideration during the investigation. The new instrument finalises the investigation as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 2 May 2007. A list of references relating to rheumatic heart disease is available upon request to the Repatriation Medical Authority.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the VEA and the MRCA may result in various civil and criminal consequences. While the explanatory notes do not specify the exact offences, penalties, or consequences for breach, under Australian law, breaches of legislative requirements can lead to fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on the severity and nature of the breach. For instance, under the VEA, penalties can include fines of up to $22,200 for individuals and $111,000 for bodies corporate, while the MRCA may impose similar or more severe penalties for non-compliance with its provisions.